Cargando…
The SoftHand Pro: Functional evaluation of a novel, flexible, and robust myoelectric prosthesis
Roughly one quarter of active upper limb prosthetic technology is rejected by the user, and user surveys have identified key areas requiring improvement: function, comfort, cost, durability, and appearance. Here we present the first systematic, clinical assessment of a novel prosthetic hand, the Sof...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6188862/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30321204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205653 |
_version_ | 1783363249419321344 |
---|---|
author | Godfrey, Sasha Blue Zhao, Kristin D. Theuer, Amanda Catalano, Manuel G. Bianchi, Matteo Breighner, Ryan Bhaskaran, Divya Lennon, Ryan Grioli, Giorgio Santello, Marco Bicchi, Antonio Andrews, Karen |
author_facet | Godfrey, Sasha Blue Zhao, Kristin D. Theuer, Amanda Catalano, Manuel G. Bianchi, Matteo Breighner, Ryan Bhaskaran, Divya Lennon, Ryan Grioli, Giorgio Santello, Marco Bicchi, Antonio Andrews, Karen |
author_sort | Godfrey, Sasha Blue |
collection | PubMed |
description | Roughly one quarter of active upper limb prosthetic technology is rejected by the user, and user surveys have identified key areas requiring improvement: function, comfort, cost, durability, and appearance. Here we present the first systematic, clinical assessment of a novel prosthetic hand, the SoftHand Pro (SHP), in participants with transradial amputation and age-matched, limb-intact participants. The SHP is a robust and functional prosthetic hand that minimizes cost and weight using an underactuated design with a single motor. Participants with limb loss were evaluated on functional clinical measures before and after a 6–8 hour training period with the SHP as well as with their own prosthesis; limb-intact participants were tested only before and after SHP training. Participants with limb loss also evaluated their own prosthesis and the SHP (following training) using subjective questionnaires. Both objective and subjective results were positive and illuminated the strengths and weaknesses of the SHP. In particular, results pre-training show the SHP is easy to use, and significant improvement in the Activities Measure for Upper Limb Amputees in both groups following a 6–8 hour training highlights the ease of learning the unique features of the SHP (median improvement: 4.71 and 3.26 and p = 0.009 and 0.036 for limb loss and limb-intact groups, respectively). Further, we found no difference in performance compared to participant’s own commercial devices in several clinical measures and found performance surpassing these devices on two functional tasks, buttoning a shirt and using a cell phone, suggesting a functional prosthetic design. Finally, improvements are needed in the SHP design and/or training in light of poor results in small object manipulation. Taken together, these results show the promise of the SHP, a flexible and adaptive prosthetic hand, and pave a path forward to ensuring higher functionality in future. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6188862 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61888622018-10-26 The SoftHand Pro: Functional evaluation of a novel, flexible, and robust myoelectric prosthesis Godfrey, Sasha Blue Zhao, Kristin D. Theuer, Amanda Catalano, Manuel G. Bianchi, Matteo Breighner, Ryan Bhaskaran, Divya Lennon, Ryan Grioli, Giorgio Santello, Marco Bicchi, Antonio Andrews, Karen PLoS One Research Article Roughly one quarter of active upper limb prosthetic technology is rejected by the user, and user surveys have identified key areas requiring improvement: function, comfort, cost, durability, and appearance. Here we present the first systematic, clinical assessment of a novel prosthetic hand, the SoftHand Pro (SHP), in participants with transradial amputation and age-matched, limb-intact participants. The SHP is a robust and functional prosthetic hand that minimizes cost and weight using an underactuated design with a single motor. Participants with limb loss were evaluated on functional clinical measures before and after a 6–8 hour training period with the SHP as well as with their own prosthesis; limb-intact participants were tested only before and after SHP training. Participants with limb loss also evaluated their own prosthesis and the SHP (following training) using subjective questionnaires. Both objective and subjective results were positive and illuminated the strengths and weaknesses of the SHP. In particular, results pre-training show the SHP is easy to use, and significant improvement in the Activities Measure for Upper Limb Amputees in both groups following a 6–8 hour training highlights the ease of learning the unique features of the SHP (median improvement: 4.71 and 3.26 and p = 0.009 and 0.036 for limb loss and limb-intact groups, respectively). Further, we found no difference in performance compared to participant’s own commercial devices in several clinical measures and found performance surpassing these devices on two functional tasks, buttoning a shirt and using a cell phone, suggesting a functional prosthetic design. Finally, improvements are needed in the SHP design and/or training in light of poor results in small object manipulation. Taken together, these results show the promise of the SHP, a flexible and adaptive prosthetic hand, and pave a path forward to ensuring higher functionality in future. Public Library of Science 2018-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6188862/ /pubmed/30321204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205653 Text en © 2018 Godfrey et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Godfrey, Sasha Blue Zhao, Kristin D. Theuer, Amanda Catalano, Manuel G. Bianchi, Matteo Breighner, Ryan Bhaskaran, Divya Lennon, Ryan Grioli, Giorgio Santello, Marco Bicchi, Antonio Andrews, Karen The SoftHand Pro: Functional evaluation of a novel, flexible, and robust myoelectric prosthesis |
title | The SoftHand Pro: Functional evaluation of a novel, flexible, and robust myoelectric prosthesis |
title_full | The SoftHand Pro: Functional evaluation of a novel, flexible, and robust myoelectric prosthesis |
title_fullStr | The SoftHand Pro: Functional evaluation of a novel, flexible, and robust myoelectric prosthesis |
title_full_unstemmed | The SoftHand Pro: Functional evaluation of a novel, flexible, and robust myoelectric prosthesis |
title_short | The SoftHand Pro: Functional evaluation of a novel, flexible, and robust myoelectric prosthesis |
title_sort | softhand pro: functional evaluation of a novel, flexible, and robust myoelectric prosthesis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6188862/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30321204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205653 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT godfreysashablue thesofthandprofunctionalevaluationofanovelflexibleandrobustmyoelectricprosthesis AT zhaokristind thesofthandprofunctionalevaluationofanovelflexibleandrobustmyoelectricprosthesis AT theueramanda thesofthandprofunctionalevaluationofanovelflexibleandrobustmyoelectricprosthesis AT catalanomanuelg thesofthandprofunctionalevaluationofanovelflexibleandrobustmyoelectricprosthesis AT bianchimatteo thesofthandprofunctionalevaluationofanovelflexibleandrobustmyoelectricprosthesis AT breighnerryan thesofthandprofunctionalevaluationofanovelflexibleandrobustmyoelectricprosthesis AT bhaskarandivya thesofthandprofunctionalevaluationofanovelflexibleandrobustmyoelectricprosthesis AT lennonryan thesofthandprofunctionalevaluationofanovelflexibleandrobustmyoelectricprosthesis AT grioligiorgio thesofthandprofunctionalevaluationofanovelflexibleandrobustmyoelectricprosthesis AT santellomarco thesofthandprofunctionalevaluationofanovelflexibleandrobustmyoelectricprosthesis AT bicchiantonio thesofthandprofunctionalevaluationofanovelflexibleandrobustmyoelectricprosthesis AT andrewskaren thesofthandprofunctionalevaluationofanovelflexibleandrobustmyoelectricprosthesis AT godfreysashablue softhandprofunctionalevaluationofanovelflexibleandrobustmyoelectricprosthesis AT zhaokristind softhandprofunctionalevaluationofanovelflexibleandrobustmyoelectricprosthesis AT theueramanda softhandprofunctionalevaluationofanovelflexibleandrobustmyoelectricprosthesis AT catalanomanuelg softhandprofunctionalevaluationofanovelflexibleandrobustmyoelectricprosthesis AT bianchimatteo softhandprofunctionalevaluationofanovelflexibleandrobustmyoelectricprosthesis AT breighnerryan softhandprofunctionalevaluationofanovelflexibleandrobustmyoelectricprosthesis AT bhaskarandivya softhandprofunctionalevaluationofanovelflexibleandrobustmyoelectricprosthesis AT lennonryan softhandprofunctionalevaluationofanovelflexibleandrobustmyoelectricprosthesis AT grioligiorgio softhandprofunctionalevaluationofanovelflexibleandrobustmyoelectricprosthesis AT santellomarco softhandprofunctionalevaluationofanovelflexibleandrobustmyoelectricprosthesis AT bicchiantonio softhandprofunctionalevaluationofanovelflexibleandrobustmyoelectricprosthesis AT andrewskaren softhandprofunctionalevaluationofanovelflexibleandrobustmyoelectricprosthesis |