Cargando…

Strategies to Preserve Cognition in Patients With Brain Metastases: A Review

Brain metastases are common to the natural history of many advanced malignancies. Historically, whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) has played a key role in the management of brain metastases, especially for patients with multiple lesions. However, prospective trials have demonstrated consistent ne...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Robin, Tyler P., Rusthoven, Chad G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6189295/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30356657
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2018.00415
_version_ 1783363337262727168
author Robin, Tyler P.
Rusthoven, Chad G.
author_facet Robin, Tyler P.
Rusthoven, Chad G.
author_sort Robin, Tyler P.
collection PubMed
description Brain metastases are common to the natural history of many advanced malignancies. Historically, whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) has played a key role in the management of brain metastases, especially for patients with multiple lesions. However, prospective trials have demonstrated consistent neurocognitive toxicities after WBRT, and various pharmacologic and anatomic strategies designed to mitigate these toxicities have been studied in recent years. Memantine, an NMDA receptor antagonist, taken during and after WBRT improved cognitive preservation in a randomized trial over placebo. Deliberate reductions in radiation dose to the hippocampus, via hippocampal-avoidance (HA)-WBRT, resulted in improved cognition over historic controls in a phase II trial, and follow-up randomized trials are now ongoing to evaluate cognitive outcomes with HA vs. conventional brain radiation techniques. Nevertheless, some of the most promising strategies currently available to reduce the cognitive effects of brain radiation may be found in efforts to avoid or delay WBRT administration altogether. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), involving focused, high-dose radiation to central nervous system (CNS) lesions with maximal sparing of normal brain parenchyma, has become the standard for limited brain metastases (classically 1–3 or 4 lesions) in the wake of multiple randomized trials demonstrating equivalent survival and improved cognition with SRS alone compared to SRS plus WBRT. Today, there is growing evidence to support SRS alone for multiple (≥4) brain metastases, with comparable survival to SRS alone in patients with fewer lesions. In patients with small-cell lung cancer, the routine use of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) for extensive-stage disease has been also been challenged following the results of a randomized trial supporting an alternative strategy of MRI brain surveillance and early salvage radiation for the development of brain metastases. Moreover, new systemic agents are demonstrating increasing CNS penetration and activity, with the potential to offer greater control of widespread and microscopic brain disease that was previously only achievable with WBRT. In this review, we endeavor to put these clinical data on cognition and brain metastases into historical context and to survey the evolving landscape of strategies to improve future outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6189295
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61892952018-10-23 Strategies to Preserve Cognition in Patients With Brain Metastases: A Review Robin, Tyler P. Rusthoven, Chad G. Front Oncol Oncology Brain metastases are common to the natural history of many advanced malignancies. Historically, whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) has played a key role in the management of brain metastases, especially for patients with multiple lesions. However, prospective trials have demonstrated consistent neurocognitive toxicities after WBRT, and various pharmacologic and anatomic strategies designed to mitigate these toxicities have been studied in recent years. Memantine, an NMDA receptor antagonist, taken during and after WBRT improved cognitive preservation in a randomized trial over placebo. Deliberate reductions in radiation dose to the hippocampus, via hippocampal-avoidance (HA)-WBRT, resulted in improved cognition over historic controls in a phase II trial, and follow-up randomized trials are now ongoing to evaluate cognitive outcomes with HA vs. conventional brain radiation techniques. Nevertheless, some of the most promising strategies currently available to reduce the cognitive effects of brain radiation may be found in efforts to avoid or delay WBRT administration altogether. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), involving focused, high-dose radiation to central nervous system (CNS) lesions with maximal sparing of normal brain parenchyma, has become the standard for limited brain metastases (classically 1–3 or 4 lesions) in the wake of multiple randomized trials demonstrating equivalent survival and improved cognition with SRS alone compared to SRS plus WBRT. Today, there is growing evidence to support SRS alone for multiple (≥4) brain metastases, with comparable survival to SRS alone in patients with fewer lesions. In patients with small-cell lung cancer, the routine use of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) for extensive-stage disease has been also been challenged following the results of a randomized trial supporting an alternative strategy of MRI brain surveillance and early salvage radiation for the development of brain metastases. Moreover, new systemic agents are demonstrating increasing CNS penetration and activity, with the potential to offer greater control of widespread and microscopic brain disease that was previously only achievable with WBRT. In this review, we endeavor to put these clinical data on cognition and brain metastases into historical context and to survey the evolving landscape of strategies to improve future outcomes. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6189295/ /pubmed/30356657 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2018.00415 Text en Copyright © 2018 Robin and Rusthoven. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Robin, Tyler P.
Rusthoven, Chad G.
Strategies to Preserve Cognition in Patients With Brain Metastases: A Review
title Strategies to Preserve Cognition in Patients With Brain Metastases: A Review
title_full Strategies to Preserve Cognition in Patients With Brain Metastases: A Review
title_fullStr Strategies to Preserve Cognition in Patients With Brain Metastases: A Review
title_full_unstemmed Strategies to Preserve Cognition in Patients With Brain Metastases: A Review
title_short Strategies to Preserve Cognition in Patients With Brain Metastases: A Review
title_sort strategies to preserve cognition in patients with brain metastases: a review
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6189295/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30356657
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2018.00415
work_keys_str_mv AT robintylerp strategiestopreservecognitioninpatientswithbrainmetastasesareview
AT rusthovenchadg strategiestopreservecognitioninpatientswithbrainmetastasesareview