Cargando…

Comparison of the microdrop and minimum volume cooling methods for vitrification of porcine in vitro-produced zygotes and blastocysts after equilibration in low concentrations of cryoprotectant agents

We compared the efficacy of the microdrop and minimum volume cooling (MVC) methods for the vitrification of in vitro-produced porcine zygotes and blastocysts after equilibration in low concentrations of cryoprotectant agents. Zygotes and blastocysts were equilibrated in 2% (v/v) ethylene glycol and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: NGUYEN, Van Khanh, VU, Huong Thi Thu, NGUYEN, Huong Thi, QUAN, Huu Xuan, PHAM, Lan Doan, KIKUCHI, Kazuhiro, NGUYEN, Son Thanh, SOMFAI, Tamas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Society for Reproduction and Development 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6189571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30101829
http://dx.doi.org/10.1262/jrd.2018-047
_version_ 1783363390208475136
author NGUYEN, Van Khanh
VU, Huong Thi Thu
NGUYEN, Huong Thi
QUAN, Huu Xuan
PHAM, Lan Doan
KIKUCHI, Kazuhiro
NGUYEN, Son Thanh
SOMFAI, Tamas
author_facet NGUYEN, Van Khanh
VU, Huong Thi Thu
NGUYEN, Huong Thi
QUAN, Huu Xuan
PHAM, Lan Doan
KIKUCHI, Kazuhiro
NGUYEN, Son Thanh
SOMFAI, Tamas
author_sort NGUYEN, Van Khanh
collection PubMed
description We compared the efficacy of the microdrop and minimum volume cooling (MVC) methods for the vitrification of in vitro-produced porcine zygotes and blastocysts after equilibration in low concentrations of cryoprotectant agents. Zygotes and blastocysts were equilibrated in 2% (v/v) ethylene glycol and 2% (v/v) propylene glycol for 13–15 min. Then, they were vitrified in a medium comprised of 17.5% ethylene glycol, 17.5% propylene glycol, 0.3 M sucrose, and 50 mg/ml polyvinylpyrrolidone either by either dropping them directly into liquid nitrogen (microdrop method) or placing them on Cryotop sheets in a minimum volume of medium and plunging into liquid nitrogen (MVC method). Both zygotes and blastocysts were successfully vitrified. For the vitrification of zygotes, the MVC and microdrop methods were equally effective; however, for blastocyst vitrification, MVC was superior. For both methods, the vitrification of zygotes produced higher-quality embryos than the vitrification of blastocysts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6189571
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher The Society for Reproduction and Development
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61895712018-10-19 Comparison of the microdrop and minimum volume cooling methods for vitrification of porcine in vitro-produced zygotes and blastocysts after equilibration in low concentrations of cryoprotectant agents NGUYEN, Van Khanh VU, Huong Thi Thu NGUYEN, Huong Thi QUAN, Huu Xuan PHAM, Lan Doan KIKUCHI, Kazuhiro NGUYEN, Son Thanh SOMFAI, Tamas J Reprod Dev Technology Report We compared the efficacy of the microdrop and minimum volume cooling (MVC) methods for the vitrification of in vitro-produced porcine zygotes and blastocysts after equilibration in low concentrations of cryoprotectant agents. Zygotes and blastocysts were equilibrated in 2% (v/v) ethylene glycol and 2% (v/v) propylene glycol for 13–15 min. Then, they were vitrified in a medium comprised of 17.5% ethylene glycol, 17.5% propylene glycol, 0.3 M sucrose, and 50 mg/ml polyvinylpyrrolidone either by either dropping them directly into liquid nitrogen (microdrop method) or placing them on Cryotop sheets in a minimum volume of medium and plunging into liquid nitrogen (MVC method). Both zygotes and blastocysts were successfully vitrified. For the vitrification of zygotes, the MVC and microdrop methods were equally effective; however, for blastocyst vitrification, MVC was superior. For both methods, the vitrification of zygotes produced higher-quality embryos than the vitrification of blastocysts. The Society for Reproduction and Development 2018-08-10 2018-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6189571/ /pubmed/30101829 http://dx.doi.org/10.1262/jrd.2018-047 Text en ©2018 Society for Reproduction and Development This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License. (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Technology Report
NGUYEN, Van Khanh
VU, Huong Thi Thu
NGUYEN, Huong Thi
QUAN, Huu Xuan
PHAM, Lan Doan
KIKUCHI, Kazuhiro
NGUYEN, Son Thanh
SOMFAI, Tamas
Comparison of the microdrop and minimum volume cooling methods for vitrification of porcine in vitro-produced zygotes and blastocysts after equilibration in low concentrations of cryoprotectant agents
title Comparison of the microdrop and minimum volume cooling methods for vitrification of porcine in vitro-produced zygotes and blastocysts after equilibration in low concentrations of cryoprotectant agents
title_full Comparison of the microdrop and minimum volume cooling methods for vitrification of porcine in vitro-produced zygotes and blastocysts after equilibration in low concentrations of cryoprotectant agents
title_fullStr Comparison of the microdrop and minimum volume cooling methods for vitrification of porcine in vitro-produced zygotes and blastocysts after equilibration in low concentrations of cryoprotectant agents
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the microdrop and minimum volume cooling methods for vitrification of porcine in vitro-produced zygotes and blastocysts after equilibration in low concentrations of cryoprotectant agents
title_short Comparison of the microdrop and minimum volume cooling methods for vitrification of porcine in vitro-produced zygotes and blastocysts after equilibration in low concentrations of cryoprotectant agents
title_sort comparison of the microdrop and minimum volume cooling methods for vitrification of porcine in vitro-produced zygotes and blastocysts after equilibration in low concentrations of cryoprotectant agents
topic Technology Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6189571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30101829
http://dx.doi.org/10.1262/jrd.2018-047
work_keys_str_mv AT nguyenvankhanh comparisonofthemicrodropandminimumvolumecoolingmethodsforvitrificationofporcineinvitroproducedzygotesandblastocystsafterequilibrationinlowconcentrationsofcryoprotectantagents
AT vuhuongthithu comparisonofthemicrodropandminimumvolumecoolingmethodsforvitrificationofporcineinvitroproducedzygotesandblastocystsafterequilibrationinlowconcentrationsofcryoprotectantagents
AT nguyenhuongthi comparisonofthemicrodropandminimumvolumecoolingmethodsforvitrificationofporcineinvitroproducedzygotesandblastocystsafterequilibrationinlowconcentrationsofcryoprotectantagents
AT quanhuuxuan comparisonofthemicrodropandminimumvolumecoolingmethodsforvitrificationofporcineinvitroproducedzygotesandblastocystsafterequilibrationinlowconcentrationsofcryoprotectantagents
AT phamlandoan comparisonofthemicrodropandminimumvolumecoolingmethodsforvitrificationofporcineinvitroproducedzygotesandblastocystsafterequilibrationinlowconcentrationsofcryoprotectantagents
AT kikuchikazuhiro comparisonofthemicrodropandminimumvolumecoolingmethodsforvitrificationofporcineinvitroproducedzygotesandblastocystsafterequilibrationinlowconcentrationsofcryoprotectantagents
AT nguyensonthanh comparisonofthemicrodropandminimumvolumecoolingmethodsforvitrificationofporcineinvitroproducedzygotesandblastocystsafterequilibrationinlowconcentrationsofcryoprotectantagents
AT somfaitamas comparisonofthemicrodropandminimumvolumecoolingmethodsforvitrificationofporcineinvitroproducedzygotesandblastocystsafterequilibrationinlowconcentrationsofcryoprotectantagents