Cargando…
The candidate perspective of the clinical competency test (CCT) of the MICGP examination: a mixed-methods study
BACKGROUND: The clinical competency test (CCT) was introduced by the Irish College of General Practitioners (ICGP) in 2015. Similar to the clinical skills assessment (CSA) of the Membership of the Royal College of General Practitioners exam (MRCGP), the CCT is a modified objective structured clinica...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Royal College of General Practitioners
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6189776/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30564738 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgpopen18X101605 |
_version_ | 1783363428199432192 |
---|---|
author | Foley, Tony McLoughlin, Kathleen Walsh, Elaine K Leggett, Paul O'Reilly, Muríosa Owens, Molly Jennings, Aisling A |
author_facet | Foley, Tony McLoughlin, Kathleen Walsh, Elaine K Leggett, Paul O'Reilly, Muríosa Owens, Molly Jennings, Aisling A |
author_sort | Foley, Tony |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The clinical competency test (CCT) was introduced by the Irish College of General Practitioners (ICGP) in 2015. Similar to the clinical skills assessment (CSA) of the Membership of the Royal College of General Practitioners exam (MRCGP), the CCT is a modified objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the MICGP CCT from the candidates' perspective, to gain an insight into their views of its fairness, relevance, and acceptability. DESIGN & SETTING: This mixed-methods study was conducted with GP registrars in Ireland. METHOD: The study was conducted in two phases. Firstly, focus groups were conducted with participants who had previously undertaken the CCT to explore their experience of the CCT. Secondly, findings from the focus groups informed the development of an online questionnaire, which was sent to all GP registrars who completed the CCT in the 2017 summer sitting. RESULTS: Two focus groups were held with a total of nine participants. Following this, the online questionnaire was emailed to 134 registrars. Of these, 83 registrars completed the questionnaire in full. Registrars reported that the CCT is a fair exam and is relevant to daily general practice. They considered the exam to be a comprehensive assessment that has a positive educational impact. However, they were challenged by time restrictions, and found it financially and emotionally stressful. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to evaluate the candidate’s perspective of an exiting GP membership exam in the UK or Ireland. The CCT is well-regarded by registrars. The study results will help to inform the future development of the CCT exam. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6189776 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Royal College of General Practitioners |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61897762018-12-18 The candidate perspective of the clinical competency test (CCT) of the MICGP examination: a mixed-methods study Foley, Tony McLoughlin, Kathleen Walsh, Elaine K Leggett, Paul O'Reilly, Muríosa Owens, Molly Jennings, Aisling A BJGP Open Research BACKGROUND: The clinical competency test (CCT) was introduced by the Irish College of General Practitioners (ICGP) in 2015. Similar to the clinical skills assessment (CSA) of the Membership of the Royal College of General Practitioners exam (MRCGP), the CCT is a modified objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the MICGP CCT from the candidates' perspective, to gain an insight into their views of its fairness, relevance, and acceptability. DESIGN & SETTING: This mixed-methods study was conducted with GP registrars in Ireland. METHOD: The study was conducted in two phases. Firstly, focus groups were conducted with participants who had previously undertaken the CCT to explore their experience of the CCT. Secondly, findings from the focus groups informed the development of an online questionnaire, which was sent to all GP registrars who completed the CCT in the 2017 summer sitting. RESULTS: Two focus groups were held with a total of nine participants. Following this, the online questionnaire was emailed to 134 registrars. Of these, 83 registrars completed the questionnaire in full. Registrars reported that the CCT is a fair exam and is relevant to daily general practice. They considered the exam to be a comprehensive assessment that has a positive educational impact. However, they were challenged by time restrictions, and found it financially and emotionally stressful. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to evaluate the candidate’s perspective of an exiting GP membership exam in the UK or Ireland. The CCT is well-regarded by registrars. The study results will help to inform the future development of the CCT exam. Royal College of General Practitioners 2018-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6189776/ /pubmed/30564738 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgpopen18X101605 Text en Copyright © The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is Open Access: CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | Research Foley, Tony McLoughlin, Kathleen Walsh, Elaine K Leggett, Paul O'Reilly, Muríosa Owens, Molly Jennings, Aisling A The candidate perspective of the clinical competency test (CCT) of the MICGP examination: a mixed-methods study |
title | The candidate perspective of the clinical competency test (CCT) of the MICGP examination: a mixed-methods study |
title_full | The candidate perspective of the clinical competency test (CCT) of the MICGP examination: a mixed-methods study |
title_fullStr | The candidate perspective of the clinical competency test (CCT) of the MICGP examination: a mixed-methods study |
title_full_unstemmed | The candidate perspective of the clinical competency test (CCT) of the MICGP examination: a mixed-methods study |
title_short | The candidate perspective of the clinical competency test (CCT) of the MICGP examination: a mixed-methods study |
title_sort | candidate perspective of the clinical competency test (cct) of the micgp examination: a mixed-methods study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6189776/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30564738 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgpopen18X101605 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT foleytony thecandidateperspectiveoftheclinicalcompetencytestcctofthemicgpexaminationamixedmethodsstudy AT mcloughlinkathleen thecandidateperspectiveoftheclinicalcompetencytestcctofthemicgpexaminationamixedmethodsstudy AT walshelainek thecandidateperspectiveoftheclinicalcompetencytestcctofthemicgpexaminationamixedmethodsstudy AT leggettpaul thecandidateperspectiveoftheclinicalcompetencytestcctofthemicgpexaminationamixedmethodsstudy AT oreillymuriosa thecandidateperspectiveoftheclinicalcompetencytestcctofthemicgpexaminationamixedmethodsstudy AT owensmolly thecandidateperspectiveoftheclinicalcompetencytestcctofthemicgpexaminationamixedmethodsstudy AT jenningsaislinga thecandidateperspectiveoftheclinicalcompetencytestcctofthemicgpexaminationamixedmethodsstudy AT foleytony candidateperspectiveoftheclinicalcompetencytestcctofthemicgpexaminationamixedmethodsstudy AT mcloughlinkathleen candidateperspectiveoftheclinicalcompetencytestcctofthemicgpexaminationamixedmethodsstudy AT walshelainek candidateperspectiveoftheclinicalcompetencytestcctofthemicgpexaminationamixedmethodsstudy AT leggettpaul candidateperspectiveoftheclinicalcompetencytestcctofthemicgpexaminationamixedmethodsstudy AT oreillymuriosa candidateperspectiveoftheclinicalcompetencytestcctofthemicgpexaminationamixedmethodsstudy AT owensmolly candidateperspectiveoftheclinicalcompetencytestcctofthemicgpexaminationamixedmethodsstudy AT jenningsaislinga candidateperspectiveoftheclinicalcompetencytestcctofthemicgpexaminationamixedmethodsstudy |