Cargando…

What leads to innovation in mental healthcare? Reflections on clinical expertise in a bureaucratic age

This paper considers a witness seminar in which healthcare professionals discussed working on an acute admissions ward run along therapeutic community lines from the 1960s to the 1980s. Participants remarked that older styles of working are ‘unimaginable’ today. This paper discusses why. Literature...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Armstrong, Neil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6189986/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30229718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjb.2018.14
_version_ 1783363472837312512
author Armstrong, Neil
author_facet Armstrong, Neil
author_sort Armstrong, Neil
collection PubMed
description This paper considers a witness seminar in which healthcare professionals discussed working on an acute admissions ward run along therapeutic community lines from the 1960s to the 1980s. Participants remarked that older styles of working are ‘unimaginable’ today. This paper discusses why. Literature from the humanities and social sciences suggest healthcare is reactive, reflecting wider cultural changes, including a preference for a more bureaucratic, standardised, explicit style of reasoning and a high valuation of personal autonomy. Such a reflection prompts questions about the nature of professional expertise, the role of evidence and the importance of the humanities and social sciences. DECLARATION OF INTEREST: None.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6189986
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61899862018-10-19 What leads to innovation in mental healthcare? Reflections on clinical expertise in a bureaucratic age Armstrong, Neil BJPsych Bull Editorial This paper considers a witness seminar in which healthcare professionals discussed working on an acute admissions ward run along therapeutic community lines from the 1960s to the 1980s. Participants remarked that older styles of working are ‘unimaginable’ today. This paper discusses why. Literature from the humanities and social sciences suggest healthcare is reactive, reflecting wider cultural changes, including a preference for a more bureaucratic, standardised, explicit style of reasoning and a high valuation of personal autonomy. Such a reflection prompts questions about the nature of professional expertise, the role of evidence and the importance of the humanities and social sciences. DECLARATION OF INTEREST: None. Cambridge University Press 2018-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6189986/ /pubmed/30229718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjb.2018.14 Text en © The Author 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Editorial
Armstrong, Neil
What leads to innovation in mental healthcare? Reflections on clinical expertise in a bureaucratic age
title What leads to innovation in mental healthcare? Reflections on clinical expertise in a bureaucratic age
title_full What leads to innovation in mental healthcare? Reflections on clinical expertise in a bureaucratic age
title_fullStr What leads to innovation in mental healthcare? Reflections on clinical expertise in a bureaucratic age
title_full_unstemmed What leads to innovation in mental healthcare? Reflections on clinical expertise in a bureaucratic age
title_short What leads to innovation in mental healthcare? Reflections on clinical expertise in a bureaucratic age
title_sort what leads to innovation in mental healthcare? reflections on clinical expertise in a bureaucratic age
topic Editorial
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6189986/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30229718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjb.2018.14
work_keys_str_mv AT armstrongneil whatleadstoinnovationinmentalhealthcarereflectionsonclinicalexpertiseinabureaucraticage