Cargando…
What leads to innovation in mental healthcare? Reflections on clinical expertise in a bureaucratic age
This paper considers a witness seminar in which healthcare professionals discussed working on an acute admissions ward run along therapeutic community lines from the 1960s to the 1980s. Participants remarked that older styles of working are ‘unimaginable’ today. This paper discusses why. Literature...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6189986/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30229718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjb.2018.14 |
_version_ | 1783363472837312512 |
---|---|
author | Armstrong, Neil |
author_facet | Armstrong, Neil |
author_sort | Armstrong, Neil |
collection | PubMed |
description | This paper considers a witness seminar in which healthcare professionals discussed working on an acute admissions ward run along therapeutic community lines from the 1960s to the 1980s. Participants remarked that older styles of working are ‘unimaginable’ today. This paper discusses why. Literature from the humanities and social sciences suggest healthcare is reactive, reflecting wider cultural changes, including a preference for a more bureaucratic, standardised, explicit style of reasoning and a high valuation of personal autonomy. Such a reflection prompts questions about the nature of professional expertise, the role of evidence and the importance of the humanities and social sciences. DECLARATION OF INTEREST: None. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6189986 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61899862018-10-19 What leads to innovation in mental healthcare? Reflections on clinical expertise in a bureaucratic age Armstrong, Neil BJPsych Bull Editorial This paper considers a witness seminar in which healthcare professionals discussed working on an acute admissions ward run along therapeutic community lines from the 1960s to the 1980s. Participants remarked that older styles of working are ‘unimaginable’ today. This paper discusses why. Literature from the humanities and social sciences suggest healthcare is reactive, reflecting wider cultural changes, including a preference for a more bureaucratic, standardised, explicit style of reasoning and a high valuation of personal autonomy. Such a reflection prompts questions about the nature of professional expertise, the role of evidence and the importance of the humanities and social sciences. DECLARATION OF INTEREST: None. Cambridge University Press 2018-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6189986/ /pubmed/30229718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjb.2018.14 Text en © The Author 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Editorial Armstrong, Neil What leads to innovation in mental healthcare? Reflections on clinical expertise in a bureaucratic age |
title | What leads to innovation in mental healthcare? Reflections on clinical expertise in a bureaucratic age |
title_full | What leads to innovation in mental healthcare? Reflections on clinical expertise in a bureaucratic age |
title_fullStr | What leads to innovation in mental healthcare? Reflections on clinical expertise in a bureaucratic age |
title_full_unstemmed | What leads to innovation in mental healthcare? Reflections on clinical expertise in a bureaucratic age |
title_short | What leads to innovation in mental healthcare? Reflections on clinical expertise in a bureaucratic age |
title_sort | what leads to innovation in mental healthcare? reflections on clinical expertise in a bureaucratic age |
topic | Editorial |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6189986/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30229718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjb.2018.14 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT armstrongneil whatleadstoinnovationinmentalhealthcarereflectionsonclinicalexpertiseinabureaucraticage |