Cargando…
The Benefit of Combining Neuronal Feedback and Feed-Forward Control for Robustness in Step Down Perturbations of Simulated Human Walking Depends on the Muscle Function
It is often assumed that the spinal control of human locomotion combines feed-forward central pattern generation with sensory feedback via muscle reflexes. However, the actual contribution of each component to the generation and stabilization of gait is not well understood, as direct experimental ev...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6190627/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30356859 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2018.00080 |
_version_ | 1783363604185088000 |
---|---|
author | Haeufle, Daniel F. B. Schmortte, Birgit Geyer, Hartmut Müller, Roy Schmitt, Syn |
author_facet | Haeufle, Daniel F. B. Schmortte, Birgit Geyer, Hartmut Müller, Roy Schmitt, Syn |
author_sort | Haeufle, Daniel F. B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | It is often assumed that the spinal control of human locomotion combines feed-forward central pattern generation with sensory feedback via muscle reflexes. However, the actual contribution of each component to the generation and stabilization of gait is not well understood, as direct experimental evidence for either is difficult to obtain. We here investigate the relative contribution of the two components to gait stability in a simulation model of human walking. Specifically, we hypothesize that a simple linear combination of feedback and feed-forward control at the level of the spinal cord improves the reaction to unexpected step down perturbations. In previous work, we found preliminary evidence supporting this hypothesis when studying a very reduced model of rebounding behaviors. In the present work, we investigate if the evidence extends to a more realistic model of human walking. We revisit a model that has previously been published and relies on spinal feedback control to generate walking. We extend the control of this model with a feed-forward muscle activation pattern. The feed-forward pattern is recorded from the unperturbed feedback control output. We find that the improvement in the robustness of the walking model with respect to step down perturbations depends on the ratio between the two strategies and on the muscle to which they are applied. The results suggest that combining feed-forward and feedback control is not guaranteed to improve locomotion, as the beneficial effects are dependent on the muscle and its function during walking. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6190627 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61906272018-10-23 The Benefit of Combining Neuronal Feedback and Feed-Forward Control for Robustness in Step Down Perturbations of Simulated Human Walking Depends on the Muscle Function Haeufle, Daniel F. B. Schmortte, Birgit Geyer, Hartmut Müller, Roy Schmitt, Syn Front Comput Neurosci Neuroscience It is often assumed that the spinal control of human locomotion combines feed-forward central pattern generation with sensory feedback via muscle reflexes. However, the actual contribution of each component to the generation and stabilization of gait is not well understood, as direct experimental evidence for either is difficult to obtain. We here investigate the relative contribution of the two components to gait stability in a simulation model of human walking. Specifically, we hypothesize that a simple linear combination of feedback and feed-forward control at the level of the spinal cord improves the reaction to unexpected step down perturbations. In previous work, we found preliminary evidence supporting this hypothesis when studying a very reduced model of rebounding behaviors. In the present work, we investigate if the evidence extends to a more realistic model of human walking. We revisit a model that has previously been published and relies on spinal feedback control to generate walking. We extend the control of this model with a feed-forward muscle activation pattern. The feed-forward pattern is recorded from the unperturbed feedback control output. We find that the improvement in the robustness of the walking model with respect to step down perturbations depends on the ratio between the two strategies and on the muscle to which they are applied. The results suggest that combining feed-forward and feedback control is not guaranteed to improve locomotion, as the beneficial effects are dependent on the muscle and its function during walking. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6190627/ /pubmed/30356859 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2018.00080 Text en Copyright © 2018 Haeufle, Schmortte, Geyer, Müller and Schmitt. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Haeufle, Daniel F. B. Schmortte, Birgit Geyer, Hartmut Müller, Roy Schmitt, Syn The Benefit of Combining Neuronal Feedback and Feed-Forward Control for Robustness in Step Down Perturbations of Simulated Human Walking Depends on the Muscle Function |
title | The Benefit of Combining Neuronal Feedback and Feed-Forward Control for Robustness in Step Down Perturbations of Simulated Human Walking Depends on the Muscle Function |
title_full | The Benefit of Combining Neuronal Feedback and Feed-Forward Control for Robustness in Step Down Perturbations of Simulated Human Walking Depends on the Muscle Function |
title_fullStr | The Benefit of Combining Neuronal Feedback and Feed-Forward Control for Robustness in Step Down Perturbations of Simulated Human Walking Depends on the Muscle Function |
title_full_unstemmed | The Benefit of Combining Neuronal Feedback and Feed-Forward Control for Robustness in Step Down Perturbations of Simulated Human Walking Depends on the Muscle Function |
title_short | The Benefit of Combining Neuronal Feedback and Feed-Forward Control for Robustness in Step Down Perturbations of Simulated Human Walking Depends on the Muscle Function |
title_sort | benefit of combining neuronal feedback and feed-forward control for robustness in step down perturbations of simulated human walking depends on the muscle function |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6190627/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30356859 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2018.00080 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT haeufledanielfb thebenefitofcombiningneuronalfeedbackandfeedforwardcontrolforrobustnessinstepdownperturbationsofsimulatedhumanwalkingdependsonthemusclefunction AT schmorttebirgit thebenefitofcombiningneuronalfeedbackandfeedforwardcontrolforrobustnessinstepdownperturbationsofsimulatedhumanwalkingdependsonthemusclefunction AT geyerhartmut thebenefitofcombiningneuronalfeedbackandfeedforwardcontrolforrobustnessinstepdownperturbationsofsimulatedhumanwalkingdependsonthemusclefunction AT mullerroy thebenefitofcombiningneuronalfeedbackandfeedforwardcontrolforrobustnessinstepdownperturbationsofsimulatedhumanwalkingdependsonthemusclefunction AT schmittsyn thebenefitofcombiningneuronalfeedbackandfeedforwardcontrolforrobustnessinstepdownperturbationsofsimulatedhumanwalkingdependsonthemusclefunction AT haeufledanielfb benefitofcombiningneuronalfeedbackandfeedforwardcontrolforrobustnessinstepdownperturbationsofsimulatedhumanwalkingdependsonthemusclefunction AT schmorttebirgit benefitofcombiningneuronalfeedbackandfeedforwardcontrolforrobustnessinstepdownperturbationsofsimulatedhumanwalkingdependsonthemusclefunction AT geyerhartmut benefitofcombiningneuronalfeedbackandfeedforwardcontrolforrobustnessinstepdownperturbationsofsimulatedhumanwalkingdependsonthemusclefunction AT mullerroy benefitofcombiningneuronalfeedbackandfeedforwardcontrolforrobustnessinstepdownperturbationsofsimulatedhumanwalkingdependsonthemusclefunction AT schmittsyn benefitofcombiningneuronalfeedbackandfeedforwardcontrolforrobustnessinstepdownperturbationsofsimulatedhumanwalkingdependsonthemusclefunction |