Cargando…

The Benefit of Combining Neuronal Feedback and Feed-Forward Control for Robustness in Step Down Perturbations of Simulated Human Walking Depends on the Muscle Function

It is often assumed that the spinal control of human locomotion combines feed-forward central pattern generation with sensory feedback via muscle reflexes. However, the actual contribution of each component to the generation and stabilization of gait is not well understood, as direct experimental ev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haeufle, Daniel F. B., Schmortte, Birgit, Geyer, Hartmut, Müller, Roy, Schmitt, Syn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6190627/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30356859
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2018.00080
_version_ 1783363604185088000
author Haeufle, Daniel F. B.
Schmortte, Birgit
Geyer, Hartmut
Müller, Roy
Schmitt, Syn
author_facet Haeufle, Daniel F. B.
Schmortte, Birgit
Geyer, Hartmut
Müller, Roy
Schmitt, Syn
author_sort Haeufle, Daniel F. B.
collection PubMed
description It is often assumed that the spinal control of human locomotion combines feed-forward central pattern generation with sensory feedback via muscle reflexes. However, the actual contribution of each component to the generation and stabilization of gait is not well understood, as direct experimental evidence for either is difficult to obtain. We here investigate the relative contribution of the two components to gait stability in a simulation model of human walking. Specifically, we hypothesize that a simple linear combination of feedback and feed-forward control at the level of the spinal cord improves the reaction to unexpected step down perturbations. In previous work, we found preliminary evidence supporting this hypothesis when studying a very reduced model of rebounding behaviors. In the present work, we investigate if the evidence extends to a more realistic model of human walking. We revisit a model that has previously been published and relies on spinal feedback control to generate walking. We extend the control of this model with a feed-forward muscle activation pattern. The feed-forward pattern is recorded from the unperturbed feedback control output. We find that the improvement in the robustness of the walking model with respect to step down perturbations depends on the ratio between the two strategies and on the muscle to which they are applied. The results suggest that combining feed-forward and feedback control is not guaranteed to improve locomotion, as the beneficial effects are dependent on the muscle and its function during walking.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6190627
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61906272018-10-23 The Benefit of Combining Neuronal Feedback and Feed-Forward Control for Robustness in Step Down Perturbations of Simulated Human Walking Depends on the Muscle Function Haeufle, Daniel F. B. Schmortte, Birgit Geyer, Hartmut Müller, Roy Schmitt, Syn Front Comput Neurosci Neuroscience It is often assumed that the spinal control of human locomotion combines feed-forward central pattern generation with sensory feedback via muscle reflexes. However, the actual contribution of each component to the generation and stabilization of gait is not well understood, as direct experimental evidence for either is difficult to obtain. We here investigate the relative contribution of the two components to gait stability in a simulation model of human walking. Specifically, we hypothesize that a simple linear combination of feedback and feed-forward control at the level of the spinal cord improves the reaction to unexpected step down perturbations. In previous work, we found preliminary evidence supporting this hypothesis when studying a very reduced model of rebounding behaviors. In the present work, we investigate if the evidence extends to a more realistic model of human walking. We revisit a model that has previously been published and relies on spinal feedback control to generate walking. We extend the control of this model with a feed-forward muscle activation pattern. The feed-forward pattern is recorded from the unperturbed feedback control output. We find that the improvement in the robustness of the walking model with respect to step down perturbations depends on the ratio between the two strategies and on the muscle to which they are applied. The results suggest that combining feed-forward and feedback control is not guaranteed to improve locomotion, as the beneficial effects are dependent on the muscle and its function during walking. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6190627/ /pubmed/30356859 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2018.00080 Text en Copyright © 2018 Haeufle, Schmortte, Geyer, Müller and Schmitt. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Haeufle, Daniel F. B.
Schmortte, Birgit
Geyer, Hartmut
Müller, Roy
Schmitt, Syn
The Benefit of Combining Neuronal Feedback and Feed-Forward Control for Robustness in Step Down Perturbations of Simulated Human Walking Depends on the Muscle Function
title The Benefit of Combining Neuronal Feedback and Feed-Forward Control for Robustness in Step Down Perturbations of Simulated Human Walking Depends on the Muscle Function
title_full The Benefit of Combining Neuronal Feedback and Feed-Forward Control for Robustness in Step Down Perturbations of Simulated Human Walking Depends on the Muscle Function
title_fullStr The Benefit of Combining Neuronal Feedback and Feed-Forward Control for Robustness in Step Down Perturbations of Simulated Human Walking Depends on the Muscle Function
title_full_unstemmed The Benefit of Combining Neuronal Feedback and Feed-Forward Control for Robustness in Step Down Perturbations of Simulated Human Walking Depends on the Muscle Function
title_short The Benefit of Combining Neuronal Feedback and Feed-Forward Control for Robustness in Step Down Perturbations of Simulated Human Walking Depends on the Muscle Function
title_sort benefit of combining neuronal feedback and feed-forward control for robustness in step down perturbations of simulated human walking depends on the muscle function
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6190627/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30356859
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2018.00080
work_keys_str_mv AT haeufledanielfb thebenefitofcombiningneuronalfeedbackandfeedforwardcontrolforrobustnessinstepdownperturbationsofsimulatedhumanwalkingdependsonthemusclefunction
AT schmorttebirgit thebenefitofcombiningneuronalfeedbackandfeedforwardcontrolforrobustnessinstepdownperturbationsofsimulatedhumanwalkingdependsonthemusclefunction
AT geyerhartmut thebenefitofcombiningneuronalfeedbackandfeedforwardcontrolforrobustnessinstepdownperturbationsofsimulatedhumanwalkingdependsonthemusclefunction
AT mullerroy thebenefitofcombiningneuronalfeedbackandfeedforwardcontrolforrobustnessinstepdownperturbationsofsimulatedhumanwalkingdependsonthemusclefunction
AT schmittsyn thebenefitofcombiningneuronalfeedbackandfeedforwardcontrolforrobustnessinstepdownperturbationsofsimulatedhumanwalkingdependsonthemusclefunction
AT haeufledanielfb benefitofcombiningneuronalfeedbackandfeedforwardcontrolforrobustnessinstepdownperturbationsofsimulatedhumanwalkingdependsonthemusclefunction
AT schmorttebirgit benefitofcombiningneuronalfeedbackandfeedforwardcontrolforrobustnessinstepdownperturbationsofsimulatedhumanwalkingdependsonthemusclefunction
AT geyerhartmut benefitofcombiningneuronalfeedbackandfeedforwardcontrolforrobustnessinstepdownperturbationsofsimulatedhumanwalkingdependsonthemusclefunction
AT mullerroy benefitofcombiningneuronalfeedbackandfeedforwardcontrolforrobustnessinstepdownperturbationsofsimulatedhumanwalkingdependsonthemusclefunction
AT schmittsyn benefitofcombiningneuronalfeedbackandfeedforwardcontrolforrobustnessinstepdownperturbationsofsimulatedhumanwalkingdependsonthemusclefunction