Cargando…

Degenerative findings on MRI of the cervical spine: an inter- and intra-rater reliability study

BACKGROUND: Knowledge about the assessment reliability of common cervical spine changes is a prerequisite for precise and consistent communication about Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) findings. The purpose of this study was to determine the inter- and intra-rater reliability of degenerative findin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moll, Line Thorndal, Kindt, Morten Wasmod, Stapelfeldt, Christina Malmose, Jensen, Tue Secher
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6190655/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30356854
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-018-0210-2
_version_ 1783363610646413312
author Moll, Line Thorndal
Kindt, Morten Wasmod
Stapelfeldt, Christina Malmose
Jensen, Tue Secher
author_facet Moll, Line Thorndal
Kindt, Morten Wasmod
Stapelfeldt, Christina Malmose
Jensen, Tue Secher
author_sort Moll, Line Thorndal
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Knowledge about the assessment reliability of common cervical spine changes is a prerequisite for precise and consistent communication about Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) findings. The purpose of this study was to determine the inter- and intra-rater reliability of degenerative findings when assessing cervical spine MRI. METHODS: Fifty cervical spine MRIs from subjects with neck pain were used. A radiologist, a chiropractor and a second-year resident of rheumatology independently assessed kyphosis, disc height, disc contour, vertebral endplate signal changes, spinal canal stenosis, neural foraminal stenosis, and osteoarthritis of the uncovertebral and zygapophyseal joints. An evaluation manual was composed containing classifications and illustrative examples, and ten of the MRIs were evaluated twice followed by consensus meetings to refine the classifications. Next, the three readers independently assessed the full sample. Reliability measures were reported using prevalence estimates and unweighted kappa (Κ) statistics. RESULTS: The overall inter-rater reliability was substantial (Κ ≥ 0.61) for the majority of variables and moderate only for zygapophyseal osteoarthritis (Κ = 0.56). Intra-rater reliability estimates were higher for all findings. CONCLUSIONS: The present classifications for some of the most common cervical degenerative findings yielded mainly substantial inter-rater reliability estimates and substantial to almost perfect intra-rater reliability estimates. . TRIAL REGISTRATION: Regional Data Protection Agency (J.no. 1–16–02-86-16). The letter of exemption from the Regional Ethical Committee is available from the author on request (case no. 86 / 2017). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12998-018-0210-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6190655
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61906552018-10-23 Degenerative findings on MRI of the cervical spine: an inter- and intra-rater reliability study Moll, Line Thorndal Kindt, Morten Wasmod Stapelfeldt, Christina Malmose Jensen, Tue Secher Chiropr Man Therap Methodology BACKGROUND: Knowledge about the assessment reliability of common cervical spine changes is a prerequisite for precise and consistent communication about Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) findings. The purpose of this study was to determine the inter- and intra-rater reliability of degenerative findings when assessing cervical spine MRI. METHODS: Fifty cervical spine MRIs from subjects with neck pain were used. A radiologist, a chiropractor and a second-year resident of rheumatology independently assessed kyphosis, disc height, disc contour, vertebral endplate signal changes, spinal canal stenosis, neural foraminal stenosis, and osteoarthritis of the uncovertebral and zygapophyseal joints. An evaluation manual was composed containing classifications and illustrative examples, and ten of the MRIs were evaluated twice followed by consensus meetings to refine the classifications. Next, the three readers independently assessed the full sample. Reliability measures were reported using prevalence estimates and unweighted kappa (Κ) statistics. RESULTS: The overall inter-rater reliability was substantial (Κ ≥ 0.61) for the majority of variables and moderate only for zygapophyseal osteoarthritis (Κ = 0.56). Intra-rater reliability estimates were higher for all findings. CONCLUSIONS: The present classifications for some of the most common cervical degenerative findings yielded mainly substantial inter-rater reliability estimates and substantial to almost perfect intra-rater reliability estimates. . TRIAL REGISTRATION: Regional Data Protection Agency (J.no. 1–16–02-86-16). The letter of exemption from the Regional Ethical Committee is available from the author on request (case no. 86 / 2017). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12998-018-0210-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6190655/ /pubmed/30356854 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-018-0210-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Methodology
Moll, Line Thorndal
Kindt, Morten Wasmod
Stapelfeldt, Christina Malmose
Jensen, Tue Secher
Degenerative findings on MRI of the cervical spine: an inter- and intra-rater reliability study
title Degenerative findings on MRI of the cervical spine: an inter- and intra-rater reliability study
title_full Degenerative findings on MRI of the cervical spine: an inter- and intra-rater reliability study
title_fullStr Degenerative findings on MRI of the cervical spine: an inter- and intra-rater reliability study
title_full_unstemmed Degenerative findings on MRI of the cervical spine: an inter- and intra-rater reliability study
title_short Degenerative findings on MRI of the cervical spine: an inter- and intra-rater reliability study
title_sort degenerative findings on mri of the cervical spine: an inter- and intra-rater reliability study
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6190655/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30356854
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-018-0210-2
work_keys_str_mv AT molllinethorndal degenerativefindingsonmriofthecervicalspineaninterandintraraterreliabilitystudy
AT kindtmortenwasmod degenerativefindingsonmriofthecervicalspineaninterandintraraterreliabilitystudy
AT stapelfeldtchristinamalmose degenerativefindingsonmriofthecervicalspineaninterandintraraterreliabilitystudy
AT jensentuesecher degenerativefindingsonmriofthecervicalspineaninterandintraraterreliabilitystudy