Cargando…

Determinants of selection in yeast evolved by genome shuffling

BACKGROUND: Genome shuffling (GS) is a widely adopted methodology for the evolutionary engineering of desirable traits in industrially relevant microorganisms. We have previously used genome shuffling to generate a strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae that is tolerant to the growth inhibitors found in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Biot-Pelletier, Damien, Pinel, Dominic, Larue, Kane, Martin, Vincent J. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6190656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30356826
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13068-018-1283-9
_version_ 1783363610910654464
author Biot-Pelletier, Damien
Pinel, Dominic
Larue, Kane
Martin, Vincent J. J.
author_facet Biot-Pelletier, Damien
Pinel, Dominic
Larue, Kane
Martin, Vincent J. J.
author_sort Biot-Pelletier, Damien
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Genome shuffling (GS) is a widely adopted methodology for the evolutionary engineering of desirable traits in industrially relevant microorganisms. We have previously used genome shuffling to generate a strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae that is tolerant to the growth inhibitors found in a lignocellulosic hydrolysate. In this study, we expand on previous work by performing a population-wide genomic survey of our genome shuffling experiment and dissecting the molecular determinants of the evolved phenotype. RESULTS: Whole population whole-genome sequencing was used to survey mutations selected during the experiment and extract allele frequency time series. Using growth curve assays on single point mutants and backcrossed derivatives, we explored the genetic architecture of the selected phenotype and detected examples of epistasis. Our results reveal cohorts of strongly correlated mutations, suggesting prevalent genetic hitchhiking and the presence of pre-existing founder mutations. From the patterns of apparent selection and the results of direct phenotypic assays, our results identify key driver mutations and deleterious hitchhikers. CONCLUSIONS: We use these data to propose a model of inhibitor tolerance in our GS mutants. Our results also suggest a role for compensatory evolution and epistasis in our genome shuffling experiment and illustrate the impact of historical contingency on the outcomes of evolutionary engineering. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13068-018-1283-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6190656
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61906562018-10-23 Determinants of selection in yeast evolved by genome shuffling Biot-Pelletier, Damien Pinel, Dominic Larue, Kane Martin, Vincent J. J. Biotechnol Biofuels Research BACKGROUND: Genome shuffling (GS) is a widely adopted methodology for the evolutionary engineering of desirable traits in industrially relevant microorganisms. We have previously used genome shuffling to generate a strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae that is tolerant to the growth inhibitors found in a lignocellulosic hydrolysate. In this study, we expand on previous work by performing a population-wide genomic survey of our genome shuffling experiment and dissecting the molecular determinants of the evolved phenotype. RESULTS: Whole population whole-genome sequencing was used to survey mutations selected during the experiment and extract allele frequency time series. Using growth curve assays on single point mutants and backcrossed derivatives, we explored the genetic architecture of the selected phenotype and detected examples of epistasis. Our results reveal cohorts of strongly correlated mutations, suggesting prevalent genetic hitchhiking and the presence of pre-existing founder mutations. From the patterns of apparent selection and the results of direct phenotypic assays, our results identify key driver mutations and deleterious hitchhikers. CONCLUSIONS: We use these data to propose a model of inhibitor tolerance in our GS mutants. Our results also suggest a role for compensatory evolution and epistasis in our genome shuffling experiment and illustrate the impact of historical contingency on the outcomes of evolutionary engineering. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13068-018-1283-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6190656/ /pubmed/30356826 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13068-018-1283-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Biot-Pelletier, Damien
Pinel, Dominic
Larue, Kane
Martin, Vincent J. J.
Determinants of selection in yeast evolved by genome shuffling
title Determinants of selection in yeast evolved by genome shuffling
title_full Determinants of selection in yeast evolved by genome shuffling
title_fullStr Determinants of selection in yeast evolved by genome shuffling
title_full_unstemmed Determinants of selection in yeast evolved by genome shuffling
title_short Determinants of selection in yeast evolved by genome shuffling
title_sort determinants of selection in yeast evolved by genome shuffling
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6190656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30356826
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13068-018-1283-9
work_keys_str_mv AT biotpelletierdamien determinantsofselectioninyeastevolvedbygenomeshuffling
AT pineldominic determinantsofselectioninyeastevolvedbygenomeshuffling
AT laruekane determinantsofselectioninyeastevolvedbygenomeshuffling
AT martinvincentjj determinantsofselectioninyeastevolvedbygenomeshuffling