Cargando…

Fat and Lean Mass Predict Bone Mass During Energy Restriction in Sedentary and Exercising Rodents

Energy restriction (ER) causes bone loss, but the impact of exercise during ER is less understood. In this study, we examined the impact of metabolic hormones and body composition on both total body bone mineral content (BMC) and local (proximal tibia) volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) during s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Metzger, Corinne E., Swift, Sibyl N., Baek, Kyunghwa, De Souza, Mary Jane, Bloomfield, Susan A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6190840/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30356821
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.01346
_version_ 1783363630057652224
author Metzger, Corinne E.
Swift, Sibyl N.
Baek, Kyunghwa
De Souza, Mary Jane
Bloomfield, Susan A.
author_facet Metzger, Corinne E.
Swift, Sibyl N.
Baek, Kyunghwa
De Souza, Mary Jane
Bloomfield, Susan A.
author_sort Metzger, Corinne E.
collection PubMed
description Energy restriction (ER) causes bone loss, but the impact of exercise during ER is less understood. In this study, we examined the impact of metabolic hormones and body composition on both total body bone mineral content (BMC) and local (proximal tibia) volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) during short- (4 weeks) and long-term (12 weeks) ER with and without exercise in adult female rats. Our first goal was to balance energy between sedentary and exercising groups to determine the impact of exercise during ER. Second, we aimed to determine the strongest predictors of bone outcomes during ER with energy-matched exercising groups. Methods: Female Sprague–Dawley rats were divided into three sedentary groups (ad libitum, –20% ER, and –40% ER) and three exercising groups (ad libitum, –10% ER, and –30% ER). Approximately a 10% increase in energy expenditure was achieved via moderate treadmill running (∼60–100 min 4 days/week) in EX groups. n per group = 25–35. Data were analyzed as a 2 × 3 ANOVA with multiple linear regression to predict bone mass outcomes. Results: At 4 weeks, fat and lean mass and serum insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) predicted total body BMC (R(2) = 0.538). Fat mass decreased with ER at all levels, while lean mass was not altered. Serum IGF-I declined in the most severe ER groups (–40 and –30%). At 12 weeks, only fat and lean mass predicted total body BMC (R(2) = 0.718). Fat mass declined with ER level regardless of exercise status and lean mass increased due to exercise (+5.6–6.7% vs. energy-matched sedentary groups). At the same time point, BMC declined with ER, but increased with exercise (+7.0–12.5% vs. energy-matched sedentary groups). None of our models predicted vBMD at the proximal tibia at either time point. Conclusion: Both fat and lean mass statistically predicted total body BMC during both short- and long-term ER. Fat and lean mass decreased with ER, while lean mass increased with EX at each energy level. Measures that predicted total body skeletal changes did not predict site-specific changes. These data highlight the importance of maintaining lean mass through exercise during periods of ER.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6190840
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61908402018-10-23 Fat and Lean Mass Predict Bone Mass During Energy Restriction in Sedentary and Exercising Rodents Metzger, Corinne E. Swift, Sibyl N. Baek, Kyunghwa De Souza, Mary Jane Bloomfield, Susan A. Front Physiol Physiology Energy restriction (ER) causes bone loss, but the impact of exercise during ER is less understood. In this study, we examined the impact of metabolic hormones and body composition on both total body bone mineral content (BMC) and local (proximal tibia) volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) during short- (4 weeks) and long-term (12 weeks) ER with and without exercise in adult female rats. Our first goal was to balance energy between sedentary and exercising groups to determine the impact of exercise during ER. Second, we aimed to determine the strongest predictors of bone outcomes during ER with energy-matched exercising groups. Methods: Female Sprague–Dawley rats were divided into three sedentary groups (ad libitum, –20% ER, and –40% ER) and three exercising groups (ad libitum, –10% ER, and –30% ER). Approximately a 10% increase in energy expenditure was achieved via moderate treadmill running (∼60–100 min 4 days/week) in EX groups. n per group = 25–35. Data were analyzed as a 2 × 3 ANOVA with multiple linear regression to predict bone mass outcomes. Results: At 4 weeks, fat and lean mass and serum insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) predicted total body BMC (R(2) = 0.538). Fat mass decreased with ER at all levels, while lean mass was not altered. Serum IGF-I declined in the most severe ER groups (–40 and –30%). At 12 weeks, only fat and lean mass predicted total body BMC (R(2) = 0.718). Fat mass declined with ER level regardless of exercise status and lean mass increased due to exercise (+5.6–6.7% vs. energy-matched sedentary groups). At the same time point, BMC declined with ER, but increased with exercise (+7.0–12.5% vs. energy-matched sedentary groups). None of our models predicted vBMD at the proximal tibia at either time point. Conclusion: Both fat and lean mass statistically predicted total body BMC during both short- and long-term ER. Fat and lean mass decreased with ER, while lean mass increased with EX at each energy level. Measures that predicted total body skeletal changes did not predict site-specific changes. These data highlight the importance of maintaining lean mass through exercise during periods of ER. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6190840/ /pubmed/30356821 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.01346 Text en Copyright © 2018 Metzger, Swift, Baek, De Souza and Bloomfield. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Metzger, Corinne E.
Swift, Sibyl N.
Baek, Kyunghwa
De Souza, Mary Jane
Bloomfield, Susan A.
Fat and Lean Mass Predict Bone Mass During Energy Restriction in Sedentary and Exercising Rodents
title Fat and Lean Mass Predict Bone Mass During Energy Restriction in Sedentary and Exercising Rodents
title_full Fat and Lean Mass Predict Bone Mass During Energy Restriction in Sedentary and Exercising Rodents
title_fullStr Fat and Lean Mass Predict Bone Mass During Energy Restriction in Sedentary and Exercising Rodents
title_full_unstemmed Fat and Lean Mass Predict Bone Mass During Energy Restriction in Sedentary and Exercising Rodents
title_short Fat and Lean Mass Predict Bone Mass During Energy Restriction in Sedentary and Exercising Rodents
title_sort fat and lean mass predict bone mass during energy restriction in sedentary and exercising rodents
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6190840/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30356821
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.01346
work_keys_str_mv AT metzgercorinnee fatandleanmasspredictbonemassduringenergyrestrictioninsedentaryandexercisingrodents
AT swiftsibyln fatandleanmasspredictbonemassduringenergyrestrictioninsedentaryandexercisingrodents
AT baekkyunghwa fatandleanmasspredictbonemassduringenergyrestrictioninsedentaryandexercisingrodents
AT desouzamaryjane fatandleanmasspredictbonemassduringenergyrestrictioninsedentaryandexercisingrodents
AT bloomfieldsusana fatandleanmasspredictbonemassduringenergyrestrictioninsedentaryandexercisingrodents