Cargando…
Scratch Collapse Test for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Despite the fact that carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common entrapment neuropathy, the diagnostic accuracy of clinical screening examinations for CTS is controversial. The scratch collapse test (SCT) is a novel test that may be of diagnostic advantage. The purpose of our study...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6191240/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30349795 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001933 |
_version_ | 1783363687672709120 |
---|---|
author | Huynh, Minh N. Q. Karir, Aneesh Bennett, Alexandria |
author_facet | Huynh, Minh N. Q. Karir, Aneesh Bennett, Alexandria |
author_sort | Huynh, Minh N. Q. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Despite the fact that carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common entrapment neuropathy, the diagnostic accuracy of clinical screening examinations for CTS is controversial. The scratch collapse test (SCT) is a novel test that may be of diagnostic advantage. The purpose of our study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the SCT for CTS. METHODS: A literature search was performed using PubMed (1966 to April 2018); Ovid MEDLINE (1966 to April 2018); EMBASE (1988 to April 2018); and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library, to April 2018). We examined the studies for the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios of the SCT. This review has been registered with PROSPERO (CRD42018077115). RESULTS: The literature search generated 13 unique articles. Seven articles were included for full text screening and 3 articles met our inclusion criteria, all of which were level II evidence with low risk of bias (165 patients). Pooled sensitivities, specificities, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratios were 0.32 [95% CI (0.24–0.41)], 0.62 [95% CI (0.45–0.78)], 0.75 [95% CI (0.33–1.67)], and 1.03 [95% CI (0.61–1.74)], respectively. The calculated area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (AUSROC) curve was 0.25, indicating a low diagnostic accuracy. CONCLUSION: The SCT has poor sensitivity; however, it is moderately specific. Based on the current literature and their variable quality of the evidence, we conclude that the SCT is not an adequate screening test for detecting CTS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6191240 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61912402018-10-22 Scratch Collapse Test for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Huynh, Minh N. Q. Karir, Aneesh Bennett, Alexandria Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Original Article BACKGROUND: Despite the fact that carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common entrapment neuropathy, the diagnostic accuracy of clinical screening examinations for CTS is controversial. The scratch collapse test (SCT) is a novel test that may be of diagnostic advantage. The purpose of our study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the SCT for CTS. METHODS: A literature search was performed using PubMed (1966 to April 2018); Ovid MEDLINE (1966 to April 2018); EMBASE (1988 to April 2018); and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library, to April 2018). We examined the studies for the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios of the SCT. This review has been registered with PROSPERO (CRD42018077115). RESULTS: The literature search generated 13 unique articles. Seven articles were included for full text screening and 3 articles met our inclusion criteria, all of which were level II evidence with low risk of bias (165 patients). Pooled sensitivities, specificities, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratios were 0.32 [95% CI (0.24–0.41)], 0.62 [95% CI (0.45–0.78)], 0.75 [95% CI (0.33–1.67)], and 1.03 [95% CI (0.61–1.74)], respectively. The calculated area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (AUSROC) curve was 0.25, indicating a low diagnostic accuracy. CONCLUSION: The SCT has poor sensitivity; however, it is moderately specific. Based on the current literature and their variable quality of the evidence, we conclude that the SCT is not an adequate screening test for detecting CTS. Wolters Kluwer Health 2018-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6191240/ /pubmed/30349795 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001933 Text en Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Huynh, Minh N. Q. Karir, Aneesh Bennett, Alexandria Scratch Collapse Test for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title | Scratch Collapse Test for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_full | Scratch Collapse Test for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Scratch Collapse Test for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Scratch Collapse Test for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_short | Scratch Collapse Test for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_sort | scratch collapse test for carpal tunnel syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6191240/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30349795 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001933 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huynhminhnq scratchcollapsetestforcarpaltunnelsyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kariraneesh scratchcollapsetestforcarpaltunnelsyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT bennettalexandria scratchcollapsetestforcarpaltunnelsyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |