Cargando…

Unveiling Intermittency in the Control of Quiet Upright Standing: Beyond Automatic Behavior

The control of posture, as in quiet upright standing, is distributed among postural reflexes and higher (cortical) centers. According to the theory of “intermittent control,” the control of posture involves a rapid succession of brief periods of postural stability, during which the body dwells relat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stins, John F., Roerdink, Melvyn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6191479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30364077
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.00850
_version_ 1783363723804540928
author Stins, John F.
Roerdink, Melvyn
author_facet Stins, John F.
Roerdink, Melvyn
author_sort Stins, John F.
collection PubMed
description The control of posture, as in quiet upright standing, is distributed among postural reflexes and higher (cortical) centers. According to the theory of “intermittent control,” the control of posture involves a rapid succession of brief periods of postural stability, during which the body dwells relatively motionless in a particular posture, and postural instability, during which the body rapidly transits to a new stable point. This theory assumes a combination of stiffness control, keeping the body in the same position, and top-down ballistic control, moving the body to a new reference position. We tested the prediction that exerting ballistic control consumes more attention, relative to stiffness control, using variations in reaction time as our index of attention load. Slower reactions to external stimulus events were expected if these events happen to coincide with ballistic control regimes compared to stiffness regimes, as unveiled from local features of the posturogram. Thirty-two participants stood on a force plate, and were instructed to press a hand-held button as soon as they heard a stimulus tone. About 40 stimuli were presented at random instances during a 3-min trial. Postural control regimes were characterized using sway-density analysis for each stimulus-response interval, by computing local dwell times from the corresponding center-of-pressure samples. We correlated stimulus-response durations with the corresponding local dwell times, and also with local velocity and local eccentricity (distance from the origin). As predicted, an overall negative correlation was observed, meaning that shorter dwell times are associated with longer stimulus-response intervals, as well as a positive correlation with local center-of-pressure velocity. The correlation between reaction times and local eccentricity was not significant. Thus, by mapping stimulus-response intervals to local center-of-pressure features we demonstrated attentional fluctuations in the control of quiet upright standing, thereby validating a core assumption underlying the notion of intermittent postural control.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6191479
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61914792018-10-24 Unveiling Intermittency in the Control of Quiet Upright Standing: Beyond Automatic Behavior Stins, John F. Roerdink, Melvyn Front Neurol Neurology The control of posture, as in quiet upright standing, is distributed among postural reflexes and higher (cortical) centers. According to the theory of “intermittent control,” the control of posture involves a rapid succession of brief periods of postural stability, during which the body dwells relatively motionless in a particular posture, and postural instability, during which the body rapidly transits to a new stable point. This theory assumes a combination of stiffness control, keeping the body in the same position, and top-down ballistic control, moving the body to a new reference position. We tested the prediction that exerting ballistic control consumes more attention, relative to stiffness control, using variations in reaction time as our index of attention load. Slower reactions to external stimulus events were expected if these events happen to coincide with ballistic control regimes compared to stiffness regimes, as unveiled from local features of the posturogram. Thirty-two participants stood on a force plate, and were instructed to press a hand-held button as soon as they heard a stimulus tone. About 40 stimuli were presented at random instances during a 3-min trial. Postural control regimes were characterized using sway-density analysis for each stimulus-response interval, by computing local dwell times from the corresponding center-of-pressure samples. We correlated stimulus-response durations with the corresponding local dwell times, and also with local velocity and local eccentricity (distance from the origin). As predicted, an overall negative correlation was observed, meaning that shorter dwell times are associated with longer stimulus-response intervals, as well as a positive correlation with local center-of-pressure velocity. The correlation between reaction times and local eccentricity was not significant. Thus, by mapping stimulus-response intervals to local center-of-pressure features we demonstrated attentional fluctuations in the control of quiet upright standing, thereby validating a core assumption underlying the notion of intermittent postural control. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6191479/ /pubmed/30364077 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.00850 Text en Copyright © 2018 Stins and Roerdink. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neurology
Stins, John F.
Roerdink, Melvyn
Unveiling Intermittency in the Control of Quiet Upright Standing: Beyond Automatic Behavior
title Unveiling Intermittency in the Control of Quiet Upright Standing: Beyond Automatic Behavior
title_full Unveiling Intermittency in the Control of Quiet Upright Standing: Beyond Automatic Behavior
title_fullStr Unveiling Intermittency in the Control of Quiet Upright Standing: Beyond Automatic Behavior
title_full_unstemmed Unveiling Intermittency in the Control of Quiet Upright Standing: Beyond Automatic Behavior
title_short Unveiling Intermittency in the Control of Quiet Upright Standing: Beyond Automatic Behavior
title_sort unveiling intermittency in the control of quiet upright standing: beyond automatic behavior
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6191479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30364077
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.00850
work_keys_str_mv AT stinsjohnf unveilingintermittencyinthecontrolofquietuprightstandingbeyondautomaticbehavior
AT roerdinkmelvyn unveilingintermittencyinthecontrolofquietuprightstandingbeyondautomaticbehavior