Cargando…

Designs of trials assessing interventions to improve the peer review process: a vignette-based survey

BACKGROUND: We aimed to determine the best study designs for assessing interventions to improve the peer review process according to experts’ opinions. Furthermore, for interventions previously evaluated, we determined whether the study designs actually used were rated as the best study designs. MET...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Heim, Amytis, Ravaud, Philippe, Baron, Gabriel, Boutron, Isabelle
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2018
Materias:	Research Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6192007/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30318018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-018-1167-7

Ejemplares similares

Patients’ Perspectives on Transforming Clinical Trial Participation: Large Online Vignette-based Survey
por: Nguyen, Van Thu, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

The most important tasks for peer reviewers evaluating a randomized controlled trial are not congruent with the tasks most often requested by journal editors
por: Chauvin, Anthony, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Impact of interventions to improve the quality of peer review of biomedical journals: a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Bruce, Rachel, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Assessment of transparency and selective reporting of interventional trials studying colorectal cancer
por: Pellat, Anna, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Public availability of results of observational studies evaluating an intervention registered at ClinicalTrials.gov
por: Baudart, Marie, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Impact of sending email reminders of the legal requirement for posting results on ClinicalTrials.gov: cohort embedded pragmatic randomized controlled trial
por: Maruani, Annabel, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Reporting of analyses from randomized controlled trials with multiple arms: a systematic review
por: Baron, Gabriel, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Agreement among Health Care Professionals in Diagnosing Case Vignette-Based Surgical Site Infections
por: Lepelletier, Didier, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Availability of results of interventional studies assessing colorectal cancer from 2013 to 2020
por: Pellat, Anna, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Development and Evaluation of a Pedagogical Tool to Improve Understanding of a Quality Checklist: A Randomised Controlled Trial
por: Fourcade, Lola, et al.
Publicado: (2007)

Inadequate description of educational interventions in ongoing randomized controlled trials
por: Pino, Cécile, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Effect of editors’ implementation of CONSORT guidelines on the reporting of abstracts in high impact medical journals: interrupted time series analysis
por: Hopewell, Sally, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Impact of adding a limitations section to abstracts of systematic reviews on readers’ interpretation: a randomized controlled trial
por: Yavchitz, Amélie, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Assessing Complex Emergency Management with Clinical Case-Vignettes: A Validation Study
por: Rousseau, Anne, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Knee Arthroplasty: Disabilities in Comparison to the General Population and to Hip Arthroplasty Using a French National Longitudinal Survey
por: Dechartres, Agnes, et al.
Publicado: (2008)

Reporting of harm in randomized controlled trials evaluating stents for percutaneous coronary intervention
por: Ethgen, Morgane, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Accuracy in detecting inadequate research reporting by early career peer reviewers using an online CONSORT-based peer-review tool (COBPeer) versus the usual peer-review process: a cross-sectional diagnostic study
por: Chauvin, Anthony, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Factors associated with online media attention to research: a cohort study of articles evaluating cancer treatments
por: Haneef, Romana, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Changes in evidence for studies assessing interventions for COVID-19 reported in preprints: meta-research study
por: Oikonomidi, Theodora, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Biomedical doctoral students’ research practices when facing dilemmas: two vignette-based randomized control trials
por: Nguyen, V.T, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

ASSIST Applicability Scoring of Surgical trials. An Investigator-reported aSsessment Tool
por: Tourabaly, Idriss, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Use of Trial Register Information during the Peer Review Process
por: Mathieu, Sylvain, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Interpretation of health news items reported with or without spin: protocol for a prospective meta-analysis of 16 randomised controlled trials
por: Haneef, Romana, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Classification and prevalence of spin in abstracts of non-randomized studies evaluating an intervention
por: Lazarus, Clément, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Development and Validation of a Questionnaire Assessing Fears and Beliefs of Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis: The Knee Osteoarthritis Fears and Beliefs Questionnaire (KOFBeQ)
por: Benhamou, Mathilde, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Weaving together peer assessment, audios and medical vignettes in teaching medical terms
por: Allibaih, Mohammad, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Incorporation of assessments of risk of bias of primary studies in systematic reviews of randomised trials: a cross-sectional study
por: Hopewell, Sally, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

A protocol of a cross-sectional study evaluating an online tool for early career peer reviewers assessing reports of randomised controlled trials
por: Chauvin, Anthony, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Impact of a short version of the CONSORT checklist for peer reviewers to improve the reporting of randomised controlled trials published in biomedical journals: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
por: Speich, Benjamin, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Outcomes in Registered, Ongoing Randomized Controlled Trials of Patient Education
por: Pino, Cécile, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Variation in severe postpartum hemorrhage management: A national vignette-based study
por: Rousseau, Anne, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Availability of Results of Trials Studying Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma over the Past 10 Years
por: Pellat, Anna, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Quality of reporting internal and external validity data from randomized controlled trials evaluating stents for percutaneous coronary intervention
por: Ethgen, Morgane, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Avoidable waste related to inadequate methods and incomplete reporting of interventions: a systematic review of randomized trials performed in Sub-Saharan Africa
por: Ndounga Diakou, Lee Aymar, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Correction to: Avoidable waste related to inadequate methods and incomplete reporting of interventions: a systematic review of randomized trials performed in Sub-Saharan Africa
por: Ndounga Diakou, Lee Aymar, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Three randomized controlled trials evaluating the impact of “spin” in health news stories reporting studies of pharmacologic treatments on patients’/caregivers’ interpretation of treatment benefit
por: Boutron, Isabelle, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Reporting Methods of Blinding in Randomized Trials Assessing Nonpharmacological Treatments
por: Boutron, Isabelle, et al.
Publicado: (2007)

Correction to: Three randomized controlled trials evaluating the impact of “spin” in health news stories reporting studies of pharmacologic treatments on patients’/caregivers’ interpretation of treatment benefit
por: Boutron, Isabelle, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Potential workload in applying clinical practice guidelines for patients with chronic conditions and multimorbidity: a systematic analysis
por: Buffel du Vaure, Céline, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Effect of response format for clinical vignettes on reporting quality of physician practice
por: Pham, Thao, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_7pp98r9io2vt2vsmd7auhbkfso