Cargando…

Cancer clinical trials – Survey evaluating patient participation and acceptance in a university-based Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC)

INTRODUCTION: Prospective clinical trials are essential to translate new therapy concepts or rather any scientific development into the medical routine. Besides a sophisticated trial protocol, the success of clinical trials depends on patient recruitment and participation. Patient recruitment remain...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kessel, Kerstin A., Vogel, Marco M.E., Kessel, Carmen, Bier, Henning, Biedermann, Tilo, Friess, Helmut, Herschbach, Peter, von Eisenhart-Rothe, Rüdiger, Meyer, Bernhard, Kiechle, Marion, Keller, Ulrich, Peschel, Christian, Bassermann, Florian, Schmid, Roland, Schwaiger, Markus, Combs, Stephanie E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6192009/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30345398
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2018.10.001
_version_ 1783363828545748992
author Kessel, Kerstin A.
Vogel, Marco M.E.
Kessel, Carmen
Bier, Henning
Biedermann, Tilo
Friess, Helmut
Herschbach, Peter
von Eisenhart-Rothe, Rüdiger
Meyer, Bernhard
Kiechle, Marion
Keller, Ulrich
Peschel, Christian
Bassermann, Florian
Schmid, Roland
Schwaiger, Markus
Combs, Stephanie E.
author_facet Kessel, Kerstin A.
Vogel, Marco M.E.
Kessel, Carmen
Bier, Henning
Biedermann, Tilo
Friess, Helmut
Herschbach, Peter
von Eisenhart-Rothe, Rüdiger
Meyer, Bernhard
Kiechle, Marion
Keller, Ulrich
Peschel, Christian
Bassermann, Florian
Schmid, Roland
Schwaiger, Markus
Combs, Stephanie E.
author_sort Kessel, Kerstin A.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Prospective clinical trials are essential to translate new therapy concepts or rather any scientific development into the medical routine. Besides a sophisticated trial protocol, the success of clinical trials depends on patient recruitment and participation. Patient recruitment remains a challenge and depends on several factors. To get a current picture of the patients’ attitude, we conducted the present survey. METHODS: We designed a survey with seven questions, which was given to all oncological patients treated within a timeframe of three months between Mai and July 2017. Participation was voluntary and anonymous. The questionnaire mainly inquires patients’ participation in clinical trials in a university-based setting, their attitude towards clinical trials regarding risks and benefits, and their source of information in this context. RESULTS: 771 patients (1:1 male/female) participated with a median age of 61 years (range 18–91 years) with a response rate of 71.5%. Of all, 17.8% (137/771) were participating in a clinical trial. The most mentioned reason was to serve medical progress and cancer research. Out of the patients not currently participating in a trial, 79 (12.7%, 79/623) refusers named the following main reasons: extensive travel time to the clinic, no therapeutic advantage, and too time-consuming. Out of the patients not offered to take part in a trial, 265 (51.0%, 265/520) would participate if offered. Of all patients, 8.3% (64/771) used the clinics' homepage as a source of information, of those 79.7% (51/64) were satisfied with its content. To enhance patient recruitment strategies, we asked how patients wish to be informed about possible trials: More than half (52.0%) of the questioned patients preferred an individual medical consultation with their physician. We further analyzed the trial participation depending on age, gender, unit, and tumor entity. We could show a significant influence of age (p < 0.001) but not for gender (p = 0.724). The trial participation was also significantly associated with the treating unit (p < 0.001) and tumor entity (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients are willing to participate in clinical trials. Better information strategies need to be implemented. Physicians need to be aware of running trials within their department and must counseling counsel patients effectively to improve recruitment. Trial concepts should keep in mind patients’ needs including an adequate number of appointments, positive risk-benefit profiles, and information material.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6192009
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61920092018-10-19 Cancer clinical trials – Survey evaluating patient participation and acceptance in a university-based Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC) Kessel, Kerstin A. Vogel, Marco M.E. Kessel, Carmen Bier, Henning Biedermann, Tilo Friess, Helmut Herschbach, Peter von Eisenhart-Rothe, Rüdiger Meyer, Bernhard Kiechle, Marion Keller, Ulrich Peschel, Christian Bassermann, Florian Schmid, Roland Schwaiger, Markus Combs, Stephanie E. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol Article INTRODUCTION: Prospective clinical trials are essential to translate new therapy concepts or rather any scientific development into the medical routine. Besides a sophisticated trial protocol, the success of clinical trials depends on patient recruitment and participation. Patient recruitment remains a challenge and depends on several factors. To get a current picture of the patients’ attitude, we conducted the present survey. METHODS: We designed a survey with seven questions, which was given to all oncological patients treated within a timeframe of three months between Mai and July 2017. Participation was voluntary and anonymous. The questionnaire mainly inquires patients’ participation in clinical trials in a university-based setting, their attitude towards clinical trials regarding risks and benefits, and their source of information in this context. RESULTS: 771 patients (1:1 male/female) participated with a median age of 61 years (range 18–91 years) with a response rate of 71.5%. Of all, 17.8% (137/771) were participating in a clinical trial. The most mentioned reason was to serve medical progress and cancer research. Out of the patients not currently participating in a trial, 79 (12.7%, 79/623) refusers named the following main reasons: extensive travel time to the clinic, no therapeutic advantage, and too time-consuming. Out of the patients not offered to take part in a trial, 265 (51.0%, 265/520) would participate if offered. Of all patients, 8.3% (64/771) used the clinics' homepage as a source of information, of those 79.7% (51/64) were satisfied with its content. To enhance patient recruitment strategies, we asked how patients wish to be informed about possible trials: More than half (52.0%) of the questioned patients preferred an individual medical consultation with their physician. We further analyzed the trial participation depending on age, gender, unit, and tumor entity. We could show a significant influence of age (p < 0.001) but not for gender (p = 0.724). The trial participation was also significantly associated with the treating unit (p < 0.001) and tumor entity (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients are willing to participate in clinical trials. Better information strategies need to be implemented. Physicians need to be aware of running trials within their department and must counseling counsel patients effectively to improve recruitment. Trial concepts should keep in mind patients’ needs including an adequate number of appointments, positive risk-benefit profiles, and information material. Elsevier 2018-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6192009/ /pubmed/30345398 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2018.10.001 Text en © 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kessel, Kerstin A.
Vogel, Marco M.E.
Kessel, Carmen
Bier, Henning
Biedermann, Tilo
Friess, Helmut
Herschbach, Peter
von Eisenhart-Rothe, Rüdiger
Meyer, Bernhard
Kiechle, Marion
Keller, Ulrich
Peschel, Christian
Bassermann, Florian
Schmid, Roland
Schwaiger, Markus
Combs, Stephanie E.
Cancer clinical trials – Survey evaluating patient participation and acceptance in a university-based Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC)
title Cancer clinical trials – Survey evaluating patient participation and acceptance in a university-based Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC)
title_full Cancer clinical trials – Survey evaluating patient participation and acceptance in a university-based Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC)
title_fullStr Cancer clinical trials – Survey evaluating patient participation and acceptance in a university-based Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC)
title_full_unstemmed Cancer clinical trials – Survey evaluating patient participation and acceptance in a university-based Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC)
title_short Cancer clinical trials – Survey evaluating patient participation and acceptance in a university-based Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC)
title_sort cancer clinical trials – survey evaluating patient participation and acceptance in a university-based comprehensive cancer center (ccc)
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6192009/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30345398
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2018.10.001
work_keys_str_mv AT kesselkerstina cancerclinicaltrialssurveyevaluatingpatientparticipationandacceptanceinauniversitybasedcomprehensivecancercenterccc
AT vogelmarcome cancerclinicaltrialssurveyevaluatingpatientparticipationandacceptanceinauniversitybasedcomprehensivecancercenterccc
AT kesselcarmen cancerclinicaltrialssurveyevaluatingpatientparticipationandacceptanceinauniversitybasedcomprehensivecancercenterccc
AT bierhenning cancerclinicaltrialssurveyevaluatingpatientparticipationandacceptanceinauniversitybasedcomprehensivecancercenterccc
AT biedermanntilo cancerclinicaltrialssurveyevaluatingpatientparticipationandacceptanceinauniversitybasedcomprehensivecancercenterccc
AT friesshelmut cancerclinicaltrialssurveyevaluatingpatientparticipationandacceptanceinauniversitybasedcomprehensivecancercenterccc
AT herschbachpeter cancerclinicaltrialssurveyevaluatingpatientparticipationandacceptanceinauniversitybasedcomprehensivecancercenterccc
AT voneisenhartrotherudiger cancerclinicaltrialssurveyevaluatingpatientparticipationandacceptanceinauniversitybasedcomprehensivecancercenterccc
AT meyerbernhard cancerclinicaltrialssurveyevaluatingpatientparticipationandacceptanceinauniversitybasedcomprehensivecancercenterccc
AT kiechlemarion cancerclinicaltrialssurveyevaluatingpatientparticipationandacceptanceinauniversitybasedcomprehensivecancercenterccc
AT kellerulrich cancerclinicaltrialssurveyevaluatingpatientparticipationandacceptanceinauniversitybasedcomprehensivecancercenterccc
AT peschelchristian cancerclinicaltrialssurveyevaluatingpatientparticipationandacceptanceinauniversitybasedcomprehensivecancercenterccc
AT bassermannflorian cancerclinicaltrialssurveyevaluatingpatientparticipationandacceptanceinauniversitybasedcomprehensivecancercenterccc
AT schmidroland cancerclinicaltrialssurveyevaluatingpatientparticipationandacceptanceinauniversitybasedcomprehensivecancercenterccc
AT schwaigermarkus cancerclinicaltrialssurveyevaluatingpatientparticipationandacceptanceinauniversitybasedcomprehensivecancercenterccc
AT combsstephaniee cancerclinicaltrialssurveyevaluatingpatientparticipationandacceptanceinauniversitybasedcomprehensivecancercenterccc