Cargando…
Single cell heterogeneity in ductal carcinoma in situ of breast
Heterogeneous patterns of mutations and RNA expression have been well documented in invasive cancers. However, technological challenges have limited the ability to study heterogeneity of protein expression. This is particularly true for pre-invasive lesions such as ductal carcinoma in situ of the br...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6192037/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29148540 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2017.143 |
Sumario: | Heterogeneous patterns of mutations and RNA expression have been well documented in invasive cancers. However, technological challenges have limited the ability to study heterogeneity of protein expression. This is particularly true for pre-invasive lesions such as ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Cell level heterogeneity in ductal carcinoma in situ was analyzed in a single 5um tissue section using a multiplexed immunofluorescence analysis of 11 disease-related markers (EGFR, HER2, HER4, S6, pmTOR, CD44v6, SLC7A5 and CD10, CD4, CD8 and CD20, plus pan-cytokeratin, pan-cadherin, DAPI, Na+K+ATPase for cell segmentation). Expression was quantified at cell level using a single cell segmentation algorithm. K-means clustering was used to determine co-expression patterns of epithelial cell markers and immune markers. We document for the first time the presence of epithelial cell heterogeneity within ducts, between ducts and between patients with ductal carcinoma in situ. There was moderate heterogeneity in a distribution of 8 clusters within each duct (average Shannon Index 0.76; ranged 0 – 1.61). Furthermore, within each patient, the average Shannon Index across all ducts ranged from 0.33 to 1.02 (S.D. 0.09 to 0.38). As the distribution of clusters within ducts was uneven, the analysis of 8 ducts might be sufficient to represent all the clusters i.e. within- and between-duct heterogeneity. The pattern of epithelial cell clustering was associated with the presence and type of immune infiltrates, indicating a complex interaction between the epithelial tumor and immune system for each patient. This analysis also provides the first evidence that simultaneous analysis of both the epithelial and immune/stromal components might be necessary to understand the complex milieu in ductal carcinoma in situ lesions. |
---|