Cargando…

Manual mid-stromal dissection as a low risk procedure to stabilize mild to moderate progressive keratoconus

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the efficacy of manual mid-stromal dissection in stabilizing progressive keratoconus. METHODS: Surgeries were performed in 16 eyes of 14 patients with progressive keratoconus. All eyes were examined before and at 1 day, 1 week, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery, and every 6...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Birbal, Rénuka S, van Dijk, Korine, Parker, Jack S, Otten, Henny, Belmoukadim, Maha, Ham, Lisanne, Baydoun, Lamis, Dapena, Isabel, Melles, Gerrit R J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6192112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30349843
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40662-018-0121-2
_version_ 1783363842945843200
author Birbal, Rénuka S
van Dijk, Korine
Parker, Jack S
Otten, Henny
Belmoukadim, Maha
Ham, Lisanne
Baydoun, Lamis
Dapena, Isabel
Melles, Gerrit R J
author_facet Birbal, Rénuka S
van Dijk, Korine
Parker, Jack S
Otten, Henny
Belmoukadim, Maha
Ham, Lisanne
Baydoun, Lamis
Dapena, Isabel
Melles, Gerrit R J
author_sort Birbal, Rénuka S
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To evaluate the efficacy of manual mid-stromal dissection in stabilizing progressive keratoconus. METHODS: Surgeries were performed in 16 eyes of 14 patients with progressive keratoconus. All eyes were examined before and at 1 day, 1 week, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery, and every 6 months thereafter. Pentacam (simK, Kmax and pachymetry), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and subjective refraction were recorded up to the latest follow-up visit (mean follow-up time 6.6 ± 2.4 years). RESULTS: All surgeries were uneventful, and no postoperative complications occurred. Keratometry values (n = 15) stabilized in 6/11 eyes (55%) with a preoperative Kmax < 60.0 diopter (D), while all eyes > 60 D showed continued progression. In 11/15 eyes (73%) pachymetry was unchanged. BCVA with spectacles remained stable in 7/12 eyes (58%) and improved ≥2 Snellen lines in 5/12 eyes (42%). BCVA with a contact lens remained stable in 4/9 eyes (44%), improved ≥2 Snellen lines in 3/9 eyes (33%) and deteriorated in 2/9 eyes (22%). CONCLUSIONS: Manual mid-stromal dissection was effective in 50% of keratoconic corneas with Kmax values < 60 D and may be considered in cases ineligible for other interventions such as UV-crosslinking, stromal ring implantation or Bowman layer transplantation. An advantage of the procedure may be that the tissue is unaltered and that no synthetic or biological implant is required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6192112
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61921122018-10-22 Manual mid-stromal dissection as a low risk procedure to stabilize mild to moderate progressive keratoconus Birbal, Rénuka S van Dijk, Korine Parker, Jack S Otten, Henny Belmoukadim, Maha Ham, Lisanne Baydoun, Lamis Dapena, Isabel Melles, Gerrit R J Eye Vis (Lond) Research BACKGROUND: To evaluate the efficacy of manual mid-stromal dissection in stabilizing progressive keratoconus. METHODS: Surgeries were performed in 16 eyes of 14 patients with progressive keratoconus. All eyes were examined before and at 1 day, 1 week, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery, and every 6 months thereafter. Pentacam (simK, Kmax and pachymetry), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and subjective refraction were recorded up to the latest follow-up visit (mean follow-up time 6.6 ± 2.4 years). RESULTS: All surgeries were uneventful, and no postoperative complications occurred. Keratometry values (n = 15) stabilized in 6/11 eyes (55%) with a preoperative Kmax < 60.0 diopter (D), while all eyes > 60 D showed continued progression. In 11/15 eyes (73%) pachymetry was unchanged. BCVA with spectacles remained stable in 7/12 eyes (58%) and improved ≥2 Snellen lines in 5/12 eyes (42%). BCVA with a contact lens remained stable in 4/9 eyes (44%), improved ≥2 Snellen lines in 3/9 eyes (33%) and deteriorated in 2/9 eyes (22%). CONCLUSIONS: Manual mid-stromal dissection was effective in 50% of keratoconic corneas with Kmax values < 60 D and may be considered in cases ineligible for other interventions such as UV-crosslinking, stromal ring implantation or Bowman layer transplantation. An advantage of the procedure may be that the tissue is unaltered and that no synthetic or biological implant is required. BioMed Central 2018-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6192112/ /pubmed/30349843 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40662-018-0121-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Birbal, Rénuka S
van Dijk, Korine
Parker, Jack S
Otten, Henny
Belmoukadim, Maha
Ham, Lisanne
Baydoun, Lamis
Dapena, Isabel
Melles, Gerrit R J
Manual mid-stromal dissection as a low risk procedure to stabilize mild to moderate progressive keratoconus
title Manual mid-stromal dissection as a low risk procedure to stabilize mild to moderate progressive keratoconus
title_full Manual mid-stromal dissection as a low risk procedure to stabilize mild to moderate progressive keratoconus
title_fullStr Manual mid-stromal dissection as a low risk procedure to stabilize mild to moderate progressive keratoconus
title_full_unstemmed Manual mid-stromal dissection as a low risk procedure to stabilize mild to moderate progressive keratoconus
title_short Manual mid-stromal dissection as a low risk procedure to stabilize mild to moderate progressive keratoconus
title_sort manual mid-stromal dissection as a low risk procedure to stabilize mild to moderate progressive keratoconus
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6192112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30349843
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40662-018-0121-2
work_keys_str_mv AT birbalrenukas manualmidstromaldissectionasalowriskproceduretostabilizemildtomoderateprogressivekeratoconus
AT vandijkkorine manualmidstromaldissectionasalowriskproceduretostabilizemildtomoderateprogressivekeratoconus
AT parkerjacks manualmidstromaldissectionasalowriskproceduretostabilizemildtomoderateprogressivekeratoconus
AT ottenhenny manualmidstromaldissectionasalowriskproceduretostabilizemildtomoderateprogressivekeratoconus
AT belmoukadimmaha manualmidstromaldissectionasalowriskproceduretostabilizemildtomoderateprogressivekeratoconus
AT hamlisanne manualmidstromaldissectionasalowriskproceduretostabilizemildtomoderateprogressivekeratoconus
AT baydounlamis manualmidstromaldissectionasalowriskproceduretostabilizemildtomoderateprogressivekeratoconus
AT dapenaisabel manualmidstromaldissectionasalowriskproceduretostabilizemildtomoderateprogressivekeratoconus
AT mellesgerritrj manualmidstromaldissectionasalowriskproceduretostabilizemildtomoderateprogressivekeratoconus