Cargando…

The Shiny Balancer - software and imbalance criteria for optimally balanced treatment allocation in small RCTs and cRCTs

BACKGROUND: In randomised controlled trials with only few randomisation units, treatment allocation may be challenging if balanced distributions of many covariates or baseline outcome measures are desired across all treatment groups. Both traditional approaches, stratified randomisation and allocati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Grischott, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6192202/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30326827
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0551-5
_version_ 1783363865286803456
author Grischott, Thomas
author_facet Grischott, Thomas
author_sort Grischott, Thomas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In randomised controlled trials with only few randomisation units, treatment allocation may be challenging if balanced distributions of many covariates or baseline outcome measures are desired across all treatment groups. Both traditional approaches, stratified randomisation and allocation by minimisation, have their own limitations. A third method for achieving balance consists of randomly choosing from a preselected list of sufficiently balanced allocations. As with minimisation, this method requires that heterogeneity between treatment groups is measured by specified imbalance metrics. Although certain imbalance measures are more commonly used than others, to the author's knowledge there is no generally accepted “gold standard”, neither for categorical and even less so for continuous variables. METHODS: An intuitive and easily accessible web-based software tool was developed which allows for balancing multiple variables of different types and using various imbalance metrics. Different metrics were compared in a simulation study. RESULTS: Using simulated data, it could be shown that for categorical variables, χ(2)-based imbalance measures seem to be viable alternatives to the established “quadratic imbalance” metric. For continuous variables, using the area between the empirical cumulative distribution functions or the largest difference in the three pairs of quartiles is recommended to measure imbalance. Another imbalance metric suggested in the literature for continuous variables, the (symmetrised) Kullback-Leibler divergence, should be used with caution. CONCLUSION: The Shiny Balancer offers the possibility to visually explore the balancing properties of several well established or newly suggested imbalance metrics, and its use is particularly advocated in clinical studies with few randomisation units, as it is typically the case in cluster randomised trials. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12874-018-0551-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6192202
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61922022018-10-22 The Shiny Balancer - software and imbalance criteria for optimally balanced treatment allocation in small RCTs and cRCTs Grischott, Thomas BMC Med Res Methodol Software BACKGROUND: In randomised controlled trials with only few randomisation units, treatment allocation may be challenging if balanced distributions of many covariates or baseline outcome measures are desired across all treatment groups. Both traditional approaches, stratified randomisation and allocation by minimisation, have their own limitations. A third method for achieving balance consists of randomly choosing from a preselected list of sufficiently balanced allocations. As with minimisation, this method requires that heterogeneity between treatment groups is measured by specified imbalance metrics. Although certain imbalance measures are more commonly used than others, to the author's knowledge there is no generally accepted “gold standard”, neither for categorical and even less so for continuous variables. METHODS: An intuitive and easily accessible web-based software tool was developed which allows for balancing multiple variables of different types and using various imbalance metrics. Different metrics were compared in a simulation study. RESULTS: Using simulated data, it could be shown that for categorical variables, χ(2)-based imbalance measures seem to be viable alternatives to the established “quadratic imbalance” metric. For continuous variables, using the area between the empirical cumulative distribution functions or the largest difference in the three pairs of quartiles is recommended to measure imbalance. Another imbalance metric suggested in the literature for continuous variables, the (symmetrised) Kullback-Leibler divergence, should be used with caution. CONCLUSION: The Shiny Balancer offers the possibility to visually explore the balancing properties of several well established or newly suggested imbalance metrics, and its use is particularly advocated in clinical studies with few randomisation units, as it is typically the case in cluster randomised trials. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12874-018-0551-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6192202/ /pubmed/30326827 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0551-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Software
Grischott, Thomas
The Shiny Balancer - software and imbalance criteria for optimally balanced treatment allocation in small RCTs and cRCTs
title The Shiny Balancer - software and imbalance criteria for optimally balanced treatment allocation in small RCTs and cRCTs
title_full The Shiny Balancer - software and imbalance criteria for optimally balanced treatment allocation in small RCTs and cRCTs
title_fullStr The Shiny Balancer - software and imbalance criteria for optimally balanced treatment allocation in small RCTs and cRCTs
title_full_unstemmed The Shiny Balancer - software and imbalance criteria for optimally balanced treatment allocation in small RCTs and cRCTs
title_short The Shiny Balancer - software and imbalance criteria for optimally balanced treatment allocation in small RCTs and cRCTs
title_sort shiny balancer - software and imbalance criteria for optimally balanced treatment allocation in small rcts and crcts
topic Software
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6192202/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30326827
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0551-5
work_keys_str_mv AT grischottthomas theshinybalancersoftwareandimbalancecriteriaforoptimallybalancedtreatmentallocationinsmallrctsandcrcts
AT grischottthomas shinybalancersoftwareandimbalancecriteriaforoptimallybalancedtreatmentallocationinsmallrctsandcrcts