Cargando…
Correction to: multiple imputation for patient reported outcome measures in randomised controlled trials: advantages and disadvantages of imputing at the item, subscale or composite score level
Autores principales: | Rombach, Ines, Gray, Alastair M, Jenkinson, Crispin, Murray, David W, Rivero-Arias, Oliver |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6192362/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30326839 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0563-1 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Multiple imputation for patient reported outcome measures in randomised controlled trials: advantages and disadvantages of imputing at the item, subscale or composite score level
por: Rombach, Ines, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Comparison of statistical approaches for analyzing incomplete longitudinal patient-reported outcome data in randomized controlled trials
por: Rombach, Ines, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
The current practice of handling and reporting missing outcome data in eight widely-used PROMS in RCT publications: are we doing well?
por: Rombach, Ines, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
The current practice of handling and reporting missing outcome data in eight widely used PROMs in RCT publications: a review of the current literature
por: Rombach, Ines, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Multiple imputation of multiple multi-item scales when a full imputation model is infeasible
por: Plumpton, Catrin O., et al.
Publicado: (2016)