Cargando…

Multi-line Adaptive Perimetry (MAP): A New Procedure for Quantifying Visual Field Integrity for Rapid Assessment of Macular Diseases

PURPOSE: In order to monitor visual defects associated with macular degeneration (MD), we present a new psychophysical assessment called multiline adaptive perimetry (MAP) that measures visual field integrity by simultaneously estimating regions associated with perceptual distortions (metamorphopsia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thurman, Steven M., Maniglia, Marcello, Davey, Pinakin G., Biles, Mandy K., Visscher, Kristina M., Seitz, Aaron R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6192464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30356944
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.7.5.28
_version_ 1783363914737647616
author Thurman, Steven M.
Maniglia, Marcello
Davey, Pinakin G.
Biles, Mandy K.
Visscher, Kristina M.
Seitz, Aaron R.
author_facet Thurman, Steven M.
Maniglia, Marcello
Davey, Pinakin G.
Biles, Mandy K.
Visscher, Kristina M.
Seitz, Aaron R.
author_sort Thurman, Steven M.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: In order to monitor visual defects associated with macular degeneration (MD), we present a new psychophysical assessment called multiline adaptive perimetry (MAP) that measures visual field integrity by simultaneously estimating regions associated with perceptual distortions (metamorphopsia) and visual sensitivity loss (scotoma). METHODS: We first ran simulations of MAP with a computerized model of a human observer to determine optimal test design characteristics. In experiment 1, predictions of the model were assessed by simulating metamorphopsia with an eye-tracking device with 20 healthy vision participants. In experiment 2, eight patients (16 eyes) with macular disease completed two MAP assessments separated by about 12 weeks, while a subset (10 eyes) also completed repeated Macular Integrity Assessment (MAIA) microperimetry and Amsler grid exams. RESULTS: Results revealed strong repeatability of MAP and high accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity (0.89, 0.81, and 0.90, respectively) in classifying patient eyes with severe visual impairment. We also found a significant relationship in terms of the spatial patterns of performance across visual field loci derived from MAP and MAIA microperimetry. However, there was a lack of correspondence between MAP and subjective Amsler grid reports in isolating perceptually distorted regions. CONCLUSIONS: These results highlight the validity and efficacy of MAP in producing quantitative maps of visual field disturbances, including simultaneous mapping of metamorphopsia and sensitivity impairment. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: Future work will be needed to assess applicability of this examination for potential early detection of MD symptoms and/or portable assessment on a home device or computer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6192464
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61924642018-10-23 Multi-line Adaptive Perimetry (MAP): A New Procedure for Quantifying Visual Field Integrity for Rapid Assessment of Macular Diseases Thurman, Steven M. Maniglia, Marcello Davey, Pinakin G. Biles, Mandy K. Visscher, Kristina M. Seitz, Aaron R. Transl Vis Sci Technol Articles PURPOSE: In order to monitor visual defects associated with macular degeneration (MD), we present a new psychophysical assessment called multiline adaptive perimetry (MAP) that measures visual field integrity by simultaneously estimating regions associated with perceptual distortions (metamorphopsia) and visual sensitivity loss (scotoma). METHODS: We first ran simulations of MAP with a computerized model of a human observer to determine optimal test design characteristics. In experiment 1, predictions of the model were assessed by simulating metamorphopsia with an eye-tracking device with 20 healthy vision participants. In experiment 2, eight patients (16 eyes) with macular disease completed two MAP assessments separated by about 12 weeks, while a subset (10 eyes) also completed repeated Macular Integrity Assessment (MAIA) microperimetry and Amsler grid exams. RESULTS: Results revealed strong repeatability of MAP and high accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity (0.89, 0.81, and 0.90, respectively) in classifying patient eyes with severe visual impairment. We also found a significant relationship in terms of the spatial patterns of performance across visual field loci derived from MAP and MAIA microperimetry. However, there was a lack of correspondence between MAP and subjective Amsler grid reports in isolating perceptually distorted regions. CONCLUSIONS: These results highlight the validity and efficacy of MAP in producing quantitative maps of visual field disturbances, including simultaneous mapping of metamorphopsia and sensitivity impairment. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: Future work will be needed to assess applicability of this examination for potential early detection of MD symptoms and/or portable assessment on a home device or computer. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2018-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6192464/ /pubmed/30356944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.7.5.28 Text en Copyright 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Articles
Thurman, Steven M.
Maniglia, Marcello
Davey, Pinakin G.
Biles, Mandy K.
Visscher, Kristina M.
Seitz, Aaron R.
Multi-line Adaptive Perimetry (MAP): A New Procedure for Quantifying Visual Field Integrity for Rapid Assessment of Macular Diseases
title Multi-line Adaptive Perimetry (MAP): A New Procedure for Quantifying Visual Field Integrity for Rapid Assessment of Macular Diseases
title_full Multi-line Adaptive Perimetry (MAP): A New Procedure for Quantifying Visual Field Integrity for Rapid Assessment of Macular Diseases
title_fullStr Multi-line Adaptive Perimetry (MAP): A New Procedure for Quantifying Visual Field Integrity for Rapid Assessment of Macular Diseases
title_full_unstemmed Multi-line Adaptive Perimetry (MAP): A New Procedure for Quantifying Visual Field Integrity for Rapid Assessment of Macular Diseases
title_short Multi-line Adaptive Perimetry (MAP): A New Procedure for Quantifying Visual Field Integrity for Rapid Assessment of Macular Diseases
title_sort multi-line adaptive perimetry (map): a new procedure for quantifying visual field integrity for rapid assessment of macular diseases
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6192464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30356944
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.7.5.28
work_keys_str_mv AT thurmanstevenm multilineadaptiveperimetrymapanewprocedureforquantifyingvisualfieldintegrityforrapidassessmentofmaculardiseases
AT manigliamarcello multilineadaptiveperimetrymapanewprocedureforquantifyingvisualfieldintegrityforrapidassessmentofmaculardiseases
AT daveypinaking multilineadaptiveperimetrymapanewprocedureforquantifyingvisualfieldintegrityforrapidassessmentofmaculardiseases
AT bilesmandyk multilineadaptiveperimetrymapanewprocedureforquantifyingvisualfieldintegrityforrapidassessmentofmaculardiseases
AT visscherkristinam multilineadaptiveperimetrymapanewprocedureforquantifyingvisualfieldintegrityforrapidassessmentofmaculardiseases
AT seitzaaronr multilineadaptiveperimetrymapanewprocedureforquantifyingvisualfieldintegrityforrapidassessmentofmaculardiseases