Cargando…
"Treatment is of primary importance, and social assistance is secondary": A qualitative study on the organisation of tuberculosis (TB) care and patients' experience of starting and staying on TB treatment in Riga, Latvia
BACKGROUND: Vulnerable individuals with tuberculosis (TB) struggle to access and stay on treatment. While patient-related and social barriers to TB treatment adherence are well documented, less is known about how the organisation and delivery of TB care influences adherence behaviour. AIM: To examin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6192559/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30332406 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203937 |
_version_ | 1783363920165076992 |
---|---|
author | Kielmann, Karina Vidal, Nicole Riekstina, Vija Krutikov, Maria van der Werf, Marieke J. Biraua, Evita Duric, Predrag Moore, David A. J. |
author_facet | Kielmann, Karina Vidal, Nicole Riekstina, Vija Krutikov, Maria van der Werf, Marieke J. Biraua, Evita Duric, Predrag Moore, David A. J. |
author_sort | Kielmann, Karina |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Vulnerable individuals with tuberculosis (TB) struggle to access and stay on treatment. While patient-related and social barriers to TB treatment adherence are well documented, less is known about how the organisation and delivery of TB care influences adherence behaviour. AIM: To examine the influence of TB service organisation and culture on patients’ experience of starting and staying on treatment in Riga, Latvia. METHODS: An intervention package to support adherence to TB treatment amongst vulnerable patients in Riga, Latvia was piloted between August 2016 and March 2017. Qualitative observations (5), interviews with staff (20) and with TB patients (10) were conducted mid-way and at the end of the intervention to understand perceptions, processes, and experiences of TB care. RESULTS: The organisation of TB services is strongly influenced by a divide between medical and social aspects of TB care. Communication and care practices are geared towards addressing individual risk factors for non-adherence rather than the structural vulnerabilities that patients experience in accessing care. Support for vulnerable patients is limited because of standardised programmatic approaches, resource constraints and restricted job descriptions for non-medical staff. CONCLUSION: Providing support for vulnerable patients is challenged in this setting by the strict division between medical and social aspects of TB care, and the organisational focus on patient-related rather than systems-related barriers to access and adherence. Potential systems interventions include the introduction of multi-disciplinary approaches and teams in TB care, strengthening patient literacy at the point of treatment initiation, as well as stronger linkages with social care organisations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6192559 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61925592018-11-05 "Treatment is of primary importance, and social assistance is secondary": A qualitative study on the organisation of tuberculosis (TB) care and patients' experience of starting and staying on TB treatment in Riga, Latvia Kielmann, Karina Vidal, Nicole Riekstina, Vija Krutikov, Maria van der Werf, Marieke J. Biraua, Evita Duric, Predrag Moore, David A. J. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Vulnerable individuals with tuberculosis (TB) struggle to access and stay on treatment. While patient-related and social barriers to TB treatment adherence are well documented, less is known about how the organisation and delivery of TB care influences adherence behaviour. AIM: To examine the influence of TB service organisation and culture on patients’ experience of starting and staying on treatment in Riga, Latvia. METHODS: An intervention package to support adherence to TB treatment amongst vulnerable patients in Riga, Latvia was piloted between August 2016 and March 2017. Qualitative observations (5), interviews with staff (20) and with TB patients (10) were conducted mid-way and at the end of the intervention to understand perceptions, processes, and experiences of TB care. RESULTS: The organisation of TB services is strongly influenced by a divide between medical and social aspects of TB care. Communication and care practices are geared towards addressing individual risk factors for non-adherence rather than the structural vulnerabilities that patients experience in accessing care. Support for vulnerable patients is limited because of standardised programmatic approaches, resource constraints and restricted job descriptions for non-medical staff. CONCLUSION: Providing support for vulnerable patients is challenged in this setting by the strict division between medical and social aspects of TB care, and the organisational focus on patient-related rather than systems-related barriers to access and adherence. Potential systems interventions include the introduction of multi-disciplinary approaches and teams in TB care, strengthening patient literacy at the point of treatment initiation, as well as stronger linkages with social care organisations. Public Library of Science 2018-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6192559/ /pubmed/30332406 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203937 Text en © 2018 Kielmann et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kielmann, Karina Vidal, Nicole Riekstina, Vija Krutikov, Maria van der Werf, Marieke J. Biraua, Evita Duric, Predrag Moore, David A. J. "Treatment is of primary importance, and social assistance is secondary": A qualitative study on the organisation of tuberculosis (TB) care and patients' experience of starting and staying on TB treatment in Riga, Latvia |
title | "Treatment is of primary importance, and social assistance is secondary": A qualitative study on the organisation of tuberculosis (TB) care and patients' experience of starting and staying on TB treatment in Riga, Latvia |
title_full | "Treatment is of primary importance, and social assistance is secondary": A qualitative study on the organisation of tuberculosis (TB) care and patients' experience of starting and staying on TB treatment in Riga, Latvia |
title_fullStr | "Treatment is of primary importance, and social assistance is secondary": A qualitative study on the organisation of tuberculosis (TB) care and patients' experience of starting and staying on TB treatment in Riga, Latvia |
title_full_unstemmed | "Treatment is of primary importance, and social assistance is secondary": A qualitative study on the organisation of tuberculosis (TB) care and patients' experience of starting and staying on TB treatment in Riga, Latvia |
title_short | "Treatment is of primary importance, and social assistance is secondary": A qualitative study on the organisation of tuberculosis (TB) care and patients' experience of starting and staying on TB treatment in Riga, Latvia |
title_sort | "treatment is of primary importance, and social assistance is secondary": a qualitative study on the organisation of tuberculosis (tb) care and patients' experience of starting and staying on tb treatment in riga, latvia |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6192559/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30332406 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203937 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kielmannkarina treatmentisofprimaryimportanceandsocialassistanceissecondaryaqualitativestudyontheorganisationoftuberculosistbcareandpatientsexperienceofstartingandstayingontbtreatmentinrigalatvia AT vidalnicole treatmentisofprimaryimportanceandsocialassistanceissecondaryaqualitativestudyontheorganisationoftuberculosistbcareandpatientsexperienceofstartingandstayingontbtreatmentinrigalatvia AT riekstinavija treatmentisofprimaryimportanceandsocialassistanceissecondaryaqualitativestudyontheorganisationoftuberculosistbcareandpatientsexperienceofstartingandstayingontbtreatmentinrigalatvia AT krutikovmaria treatmentisofprimaryimportanceandsocialassistanceissecondaryaqualitativestudyontheorganisationoftuberculosistbcareandpatientsexperienceofstartingandstayingontbtreatmentinrigalatvia AT vanderwerfmariekej treatmentisofprimaryimportanceandsocialassistanceissecondaryaqualitativestudyontheorganisationoftuberculosistbcareandpatientsexperienceofstartingandstayingontbtreatmentinrigalatvia AT birauaevita treatmentisofprimaryimportanceandsocialassistanceissecondaryaqualitativestudyontheorganisationoftuberculosistbcareandpatientsexperienceofstartingandstayingontbtreatmentinrigalatvia AT duricpredrag treatmentisofprimaryimportanceandsocialassistanceissecondaryaqualitativestudyontheorganisationoftuberculosistbcareandpatientsexperienceofstartingandstayingontbtreatmentinrigalatvia AT mooredavidaj treatmentisofprimaryimportanceandsocialassistanceissecondaryaqualitativestudyontheorganisationoftuberculosistbcareandpatientsexperienceofstartingandstayingontbtreatmentinrigalatvia |