Cargando…

Proximal Resection Margins: More Prognostic than Distal Resection Margins in Patients Undergoing Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma Resection

PURPOSE: Even though the therapeutic gold standard of hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA) resection is cancer-free resection margin (RM), surgical treatment still remains challenging. This study evaluated the prognostic significance of RM status in resected HCCA patients and identified survival prognost...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yoo, Tae, Park, Sang-Jae, Han, Sung-Sik, Kim, Seong Hoon, Lee, Seung Duk, Kim, Tae Hyun, Lee, Soon-ae, Woo, Sang Myung, Lee, Woo Jin, Hong, Eun Kyung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Cancer Association 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6192907/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29141394
http://dx.doi.org/10.4143/crt.2017.320
_version_ 1783363972264624128
author Yoo, Tae
Park, Sang-Jae
Han, Sung-Sik
Kim, Seong Hoon
Lee, Seung Duk
Kim, Tae Hyun
Lee, Soon-ae
Woo, Sang Myung
Lee, Woo Jin
Hong, Eun Kyung
author_facet Yoo, Tae
Park, Sang-Jae
Han, Sung-Sik
Kim, Seong Hoon
Lee, Seung Duk
Kim, Tae Hyun
Lee, Soon-ae
Woo, Sang Myung
Lee, Woo Jin
Hong, Eun Kyung
author_sort Yoo, Tae
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Even though the therapeutic gold standard of hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA) resection is cancer-free resection margin (RM), surgical treatment still remains challenging. This study evaluated the prognostic significance of RM status in resected HCCA patients and identified survival prognostic factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed records of 96 HCCA patients who underwent surgery from 2001 to 2012 and analyzed the RM status and prognostic factors that affecting survival. RESULTS: Negative RM (n=31, 33%) was significantly associated with better survival vs. positive RM (n=65, 67%) (mean survival time [MST], 33 months vs. 21 months; p=0.011). Margins with histological findings of non-dysplastic epithelium, low-grade dysplasia, and carcinoma in situ were not associated with survival differences (MST, 33 months vs. 33 months vs. 30 months; p=0.452), whereas positive margins were associated with poorer survival relative to carcinoma in situ (MST, 30 months vs. 21 months; p=0.050). Among patients with R0 resection, narrow (≤ 5 mm) and wide (> 5 mm) margins were not associated with survival differences (MST, 33 months vs. 30 months; p=0.234). Although positive proximal RM was associated with poorer survival compared to negative RM (MST, 19 vs. 33; p=0.002), no survival difference was observed between positive and negative distal RMs (MST, 30 vs. 33; p=0.628). Proximal RM positivity (hazard ratio [HR], 2.688; p=0.007) and nodal involvement (HR, 3.293; p < 0.001) were independent survival prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: A clear RM, especially proximal RM status, was significant prognosticator, and proximal bile duct resection to the greatest technically feasible extent may be necessary, with careful consideration of the potential morbidity and oncologic outcomes after resection. However, an aggressive approach to obtain a negative distal RM might be controversial and should be considered carefully, depending on the patient's status.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6192907
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Korean Cancer Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61929072018-10-24 Proximal Resection Margins: More Prognostic than Distal Resection Margins in Patients Undergoing Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma Resection Yoo, Tae Park, Sang-Jae Han, Sung-Sik Kim, Seong Hoon Lee, Seung Duk Kim, Tae Hyun Lee, Soon-ae Woo, Sang Myung Lee, Woo Jin Hong, Eun Kyung Cancer Res Treat Original Article PURPOSE: Even though the therapeutic gold standard of hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA) resection is cancer-free resection margin (RM), surgical treatment still remains challenging. This study evaluated the prognostic significance of RM status in resected HCCA patients and identified survival prognostic factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed records of 96 HCCA patients who underwent surgery from 2001 to 2012 and analyzed the RM status and prognostic factors that affecting survival. RESULTS: Negative RM (n=31, 33%) was significantly associated with better survival vs. positive RM (n=65, 67%) (mean survival time [MST], 33 months vs. 21 months; p=0.011). Margins with histological findings of non-dysplastic epithelium, low-grade dysplasia, and carcinoma in situ were not associated with survival differences (MST, 33 months vs. 33 months vs. 30 months; p=0.452), whereas positive margins were associated with poorer survival relative to carcinoma in situ (MST, 30 months vs. 21 months; p=0.050). Among patients with R0 resection, narrow (≤ 5 mm) and wide (> 5 mm) margins were not associated with survival differences (MST, 33 months vs. 30 months; p=0.234). Although positive proximal RM was associated with poorer survival compared to negative RM (MST, 19 vs. 33; p=0.002), no survival difference was observed between positive and negative distal RMs (MST, 30 vs. 33; p=0.628). Proximal RM positivity (hazard ratio [HR], 2.688; p=0.007) and nodal involvement (HR, 3.293; p < 0.001) were independent survival prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: A clear RM, especially proximal RM status, was significant prognosticator, and proximal bile duct resection to the greatest technically feasible extent may be necessary, with careful consideration of the potential morbidity and oncologic outcomes after resection. However, an aggressive approach to obtain a negative distal RM might be controversial and should be considered carefully, depending on the patient's status. Korean Cancer Association 2018-10 2017-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6192907/ /pubmed/29141394 http://dx.doi.org/10.4143/crt.2017.320 Text en Copyright © 2018 by the Korean Cancer Association This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Yoo, Tae
Park, Sang-Jae
Han, Sung-Sik
Kim, Seong Hoon
Lee, Seung Duk
Kim, Tae Hyun
Lee, Soon-ae
Woo, Sang Myung
Lee, Woo Jin
Hong, Eun Kyung
Proximal Resection Margins: More Prognostic than Distal Resection Margins in Patients Undergoing Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma Resection
title Proximal Resection Margins: More Prognostic than Distal Resection Margins in Patients Undergoing Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma Resection
title_full Proximal Resection Margins: More Prognostic than Distal Resection Margins in Patients Undergoing Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma Resection
title_fullStr Proximal Resection Margins: More Prognostic than Distal Resection Margins in Patients Undergoing Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma Resection
title_full_unstemmed Proximal Resection Margins: More Prognostic than Distal Resection Margins in Patients Undergoing Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma Resection
title_short Proximal Resection Margins: More Prognostic than Distal Resection Margins in Patients Undergoing Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma Resection
title_sort proximal resection margins: more prognostic than distal resection margins in patients undergoing hilar cholangiocarcinoma resection
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6192907/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29141394
http://dx.doi.org/10.4143/crt.2017.320
work_keys_str_mv AT yootae proximalresectionmarginsmoreprognosticthandistalresectionmarginsinpatientsundergoinghilarcholangiocarcinomaresection
AT parksangjae proximalresectionmarginsmoreprognosticthandistalresectionmarginsinpatientsundergoinghilarcholangiocarcinomaresection
AT hansungsik proximalresectionmarginsmoreprognosticthandistalresectionmarginsinpatientsundergoinghilarcholangiocarcinomaresection
AT kimseonghoon proximalresectionmarginsmoreprognosticthandistalresectionmarginsinpatientsundergoinghilarcholangiocarcinomaresection
AT leeseungduk proximalresectionmarginsmoreprognosticthandistalresectionmarginsinpatientsundergoinghilarcholangiocarcinomaresection
AT kimtaehyun proximalresectionmarginsmoreprognosticthandistalresectionmarginsinpatientsundergoinghilarcholangiocarcinomaresection
AT leesoonae proximalresectionmarginsmoreprognosticthandistalresectionmarginsinpatientsundergoinghilarcholangiocarcinomaresection
AT woosangmyung proximalresectionmarginsmoreprognosticthandistalresectionmarginsinpatientsundergoinghilarcholangiocarcinomaresection
AT leewoojin proximalresectionmarginsmoreprognosticthandistalresectionmarginsinpatientsundergoinghilarcholangiocarcinomaresection
AT hongeunkyung proximalresectionmarginsmoreprognosticthandistalresectionmarginsinpatientsundergoinghilarcholangiocarcinomaresection