Cargando…

Limits of Detection of Gravimetric Signals on Earth

Gravimetry is a well-established tool to probe the deep Earth’s processes. Geophysical signals coming from the deep Earth, like the inner core free oscillations, have however never been detected. Challenging quests raise the question of the limits of detection of elusive signals at the Earth’s surfa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rosat, S., Hinderer, J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6193024/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30333563
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-33717-z
_version_ 1783363994936934400
author Rosat, S.
Hinderer, J.
author_facet Rosat, S.
Hinderer, J.
author_sort Rosat, S.
collection PubMed
description Gravimetry is a well-established tool to probe the deep Earth’s processes. Geophysical signals coming from the deep Earth, like the inner core free oscillations, have however never been detected. Challenging quests raise the question of the limits of detection of elusive signals at the Earth’s surface. Knowledge of the instrumental limits and of the environmental noise level at a site is fundamental to judge the true sensitivity of an instrument. We perform a noise level comparison of various gravimeters and a long-period seismometer at the J9 gravimetric observatory of Strasbourg (France) to provide a reference of instrumental performances. We then apply a three-channel correlation analysis of time-varying surface gravity from superconducting gravimeter records to isolate the instrumental self-noise from the environmental noise. The self-noise coherence analysis shows that the instrumental noise level remains flat towards lower frequencies till 10(−4) Hz. At seismic frequencies, the self-noise is well explained by a Brownian thermal noise model. At daily and sub-daily time-scales, self-noise is increasing with the period but to a much lesser extent than observed noise level. Observed Earth’s ambient noise level at sub-seismic frequencies is hence mostly due to unmodeled geophysical processes. At hourly time-scales, our ability to detect elusive signals coming from the deep Earth’s interior is not limited by the instrument capability but is mostly due to the environmental effects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6193024
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61930242018-10-23 Limits of Detection of Gravimetric Signals on Earth Rosat, S. Hinderer, J. Sci Rep Article Gravimetry is a well-established tool to probe the deep Earth’s processes. Geophysical signals coming from the deep Earth, like the inner core free oscillations, have however never been detected. Challenging quests raise the question of the limits of detection of elusive signals at the Earth’s surface. Knowledge of the instrumental limits and of the environmental noise level at a site is fundamental to judge the true sensitivity of an instrument. We perform a noise level comparison of various gravimeters and a long-period seismometer at the J9 gravimetric observatory of Strasbourg (France) to provide a reference of instrumental performances. We then apply a three-channel correlation analysis of time-varying surface gravity from superconducting gravimeter records to isolate the instrumental self-noise from the environmental noise. The self-noise coherence analysis shows that the instrumental noise level remains flat towards lower frequencies till 10(−4) Hz. At seismic frequencies, the self-noise is well explained by a Brownian thermal noise model. At daily and sub-daily time-scales, self-noise is increasing with the period but to a much lesser extent than observed noise level. Observed Earth’s ambient noise level at sub-seismic frequencies is hence mostly due to unmodeled geophysical processes. At hourly time-scales, our ability to detect elusive signals coming from the deep Earth’s interior is not limited by the instrument capability but is mostly due to the environmental effects. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6193024/ /pubmed/30333563 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-33717-z Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Rosat, S.
Hinderer, J.
Limits of Detection of Gravimetric Signals on Earth
title Limits of Detection of Gravimetric Signals on Earth
title_full Limits of Detection of Gravimetric Signals on Earth
title_fullStr Limits of Detection of Gravimetric Signals on Earth
title_full_unstemmed Limits of Detection of Gravimetric Signals on Earth
title_short Limits of Detection of Gravimetric Signals on Earth
title_sort limits of detection of gravimetric signals on earth
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6193024/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30333563
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-33717-z
work_keys_str_mv AT rosats limitsofdetectionofgravimetricsignalsonearth
AT hindererj limitsofdetectionofgravimetricsignalsonearth