Cargando…

Collateral benefits: how the practical application of Good Participatory Practice can strengthen HIV research in sub‐Saharan Africa

INTRODUCTION: The Good Participatory Practice (GPP): Guidelines for Biomedical HIV Prevention Trials, second edition (2011) were developed to provide clinical trial sponsors and implementers with a formal stakeholder engagement framework. As one of the largest African research institutes, Wits Repro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baron, Deborah, Essien, Thandekile, Pato, Sinazo, Magongo, Miliswa, Mbandazayo, Nomthandazo, Scorgie, Fiona, Rees, Helen, Delany‐Moretlwe, Sinead
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6193316/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30334610
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jia2.25175
_version_ 1783364051382829056
author Baron, Deborah
Essien, Thandekile
Pato, Sinazo
Magongo, Miliswa
Mbandazayo, Nomthandazo
Scorgie, Fiona
Rees, Helen
Delany‐Moretlwe, Sinead
author_facet Baron, Deborah
Essien, Thandekile
Pato, Sinazo
Magongo, Miliswa
Mbandazayo, Nomthandazo
Scorgie, Fiona
Rees, Helen
Delany‐Moretlwe, Sinead
author_sort Baron, Deborah
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The Good Participatory Practice (GPP): Guidelines for Biomedical HIV Prevention Trials, second edition (2011) were developed to provide clinical trial sponsors and implementers with a formal stakeholder engagement framework. As one of the largest African research institutes, Wits Reproductive Health and HIV Institute (Wits RHI) became an early adopter of GPP by implementing its principles within large‐scale national and regional clinical trials. This article examines Wits RHI's lessons learned from implementing GPP, its ongoing efforts to institutionalize GPP, and the yet to be realized potential in creating fully sustainable structures for meaningful stakeholder engagement in HIV prevention research, implementation science and beyond. DISCUSSION: For the past seven years, Wits RHI has undertaken both centralized leadership roles in implementing GPP across multi‐party regional research consortia as well as overseeing GPP for smaller investigator‐driven trials. Through this iterative roll‐out of GPP, key lessons have emerged. Obtaining upfront funding to support GPP activities throughout and between the research life cycle, and a trained multi‐disciplinary team of GPP practitioners have helped facilitate an enabling environment for GPP implementation. We further recommend formally integrating stakeholder engagement into study documents, including monitoring and evaluation plans with indicators and performance metrics, to assist teams to track and refine their GPP strategies. Finally, institutionalizing resources and supporting organization‐wide GPP along with ongoing support can help build efficiencies and maximize economies of scale toward a pragmatic and innovative application of the GPP Guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: Thanks to a growing global network of GPP practitioners and a burgeoning GPP Community of Practice, there has been substantive progress in making GPP an integral component of clinical HIV prevention research. The Wits RHI experience highlights the possibilities and the challenges to translating the GPP principles into concrete practices within specific clinical trials and across a research institute. Realizing the full potential of GPP, including direct and indirect – ‘collateral benefits’ will require the collective buy‐in and support from sponsors, implementers and community stakeholders across the research field. As the HIV prevention research field expands, however, a more conscious and systematic implementation of GPP is timely.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6193316
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61933162018-10-25 Collateral benefits: how the practical application of Good Participatory Practice can strengthen HIV research in sub‐Saharan Africa Baron, Deborah Essien, Thandekile Pato, Sinazo Magongo, Miliswa Mbandazayo, Nomthandazo Scorgie, Fiona Rees, Helen Delany‐Moretlwe, Sinead J Int AIDS Soc Commentary INTRODUCTION: The Good Participatory Practice (GPP): Guidelines for Biomedical HIV Prevention Trials, second edition (2011) were developed to provide clinical trial sponsors and implementers with a formal stakeholder engagement framework. As one of the largest African research institutes, Wits Reproductive Health and HIV Institute (Wits RHI) became an early adopter of GPP by implementing its principles within large‐scale national and regional clinical trials. This article examines Wits RHI's lessons learned from implementing GPP, its ongoing efforts to institutionalize GPP, and the yet to be realized potential in creating fully sustainable structures for meaningful stakeholder engagement in HIV prevention research, implementation science and beyond. DISCUSSION: For the past seven years, Wits RHI has undertaken both centralized leadership roles in implementing GPP across multi‐party regional research consortia as well as overseeing GPP for smaller investigator‐driven trials. Through this iterative roll‐out of GPP, key lessons have emerged. Obtaining upfront funding to support GPP activities throughout and between the research life cycle, and a trained multi‐disciplinary team of GPP practitioners have helped facilitate an enabling environment for GPP implementation. We further recommend formally integrating stakeholder engagement into study documents, including monitoring and evaluation plans with indicators and performance metrics, to assist teams to track and refine their GPP strategies. Finally, institutionalizing resources and supporting organization‐wide GPP along with ongoing support can help build efficiencies and maximize economies of scale toward a pragmatic and innovative application of the GPP Guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: Thanks to a growing global network of GPP practitioners and a burgeoning GPP Community of Practice, there has been substantive progress in making GPP an integral component of clinical HIV prevention research. The Wits RHI experience highlights the possibilities and the challenges to translating the GPP principles into concrete practices within specific clinical trials and across a research institute. Realizing the full potential of GPP, including direct and indirect – ‘collateral benefits’ will require the collective buy‐in and support from sponsors, implementers and community stakeholders across the research field. As the HIV prevention research field expands, however, a more conscious and systematic implementation of GPP is timely. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6193316/ /pubmed/30334610 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jia2.25175 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Journal of the International AIDS Society published by John Wiley & sons Ltd on behalf of the International AIDS Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Commentary
Baron, Deborah
Essien, Thandekile
Pato, Sinazo
Magongo, Miliswa
Mbandazayo, Nomthandazo
Scorgie, Fiona
Rees, Helen
Delany‐Moretlwe, Sinead
Collateral benefits: how the practical application of Good Participatory Practice can strengthen HIV research in sub‐Saharan Africa
title Collateral benefits: how the practical application of Good Participatory Practice can strengthen HIV research in sub‐Saharan Africa
title_full Collateral benefits: how the practical application of Good Participatory Practice can strengthen HIV research in sub‐Saharan Africa
title_fullStr Collateral benefits: how the practical application of Good Participatory Practice can strengthen HIV research in sub‐Saharan Africa
title_full_unstemmed Collateral benefits: how the practical application of Good Participatory Practice can strengthen HIV research in sub‐Saharan Africa
title_short Collateral benefits: how the practical application of Good Participatory Practice can strengthen HIV research in sub‐Saharan Africa
title_sort collateral benefits: how the practical application of good participatory practice can strengthen hiv research in sub‐saharan africa
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6193316/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30334610
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jia2.25175
work_keys_str_mv AT barondeborah collateralbenefitshowthepracticalapplicationofgoodparticipatorypracticecanstrengthenhivresearchinsubsaharanafrica
AT essienthandekile collateralbenefitshowthepracticalapplicationofgoodparticipatorypracticecanstrengthenhivresearchinsubsaharanafrica
AT patosinazo collateralbenefitshowthepracticalapplicationofgoodparticipatorypracticecanstrengthenhivresearchinsubsaharanafrica
AT magongomiliswa collateralbenefitshowthepracticalapplicationofgoodparticipatorypracticecanstrengthenhivresearchinsubsaharanafrica
AT mbandazayonomthandazo collateralbenefitshowthepracticalapplicationofgoodparticipatorypracticecanstrengthenhivresearchinsubsaharanafrica
AT scorgiefiona collateralbenefitshowthepracticalapplicationofgoodparticipatorypracticecanstrengthenhivresearchinsubsaharanafrica
AT reeshelen collateralbenefitshowthepracticalapplicationofgoodparticipatorypracticecanstrengthenhivresearchinsubsaharanafrica
AT delanymoretlwesinead collateralbenefitshowthepracticalapplicationofgoodparticipatorypracticecanstrengthenhivresearchinsubsaharanafrica