Cargando…

Perioperative and Long-term Oncological Results of Minimally Invasive Pancreatoduodenectomy as Hybrid Technique – A Matched Pair Analysis of 120 Cases

Background Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy is a highly challenging procedure. The aim of this study was to analyse post-operative morbidity and mortality as well as long term overall survival in patients undergoing hybrid LPD, as compared to open pancreaticoduodenecomy (OPD) in a single surgeon s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deichmann, Steffen, Bolm, Louisa Romina, Honselmann, Kim Christin, Wellner, Ulrich Friedrich, Lapshyn, Hryhoriy, Keck, Tobias, Bausch, Dirk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2018
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6193412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29719907
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-124374
_version_ 1783364066010464256
author Deichmann, Steffen
Bolm, Louisa Romina
Honselmann, Kim Christin
Wellner, Ulrich Friedrich
Lapshyn, Hryhoriy
Keck, Tobias
Bausch, Dirk
author_facet Deichmann, Steffen
Bolm, Louisa Romina
Honselmann, Kim Christin
Wellner, Ulrich Friedrich
Lapshyn, Hryhoriy
Keck, Tobias
Bausch, Dirk
author_sort Deichmann, Steffen
collection PubMed
description Background Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy is a highly challenging procedure. The aim of this study was to analyse post-operative morbidity and mortality as well as long term overall survival in patients undergoing hybrid LPD, as compared to open pancreaticoduodenecomy (OPD) in a single surgeon series. Methods Patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) in the period from 2000 to 2015 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. All LPD procedures were performed by one specialised pancreatic surgeon (TK). Patients were matched 1 : 1 for age, sex, BMI, ASA, histological diagnosis, pancreatic texture and portal venous resection (PVR). All LPD procedures were performed as hybrid LPD – combining laparoscopic resection and open reconstruction via mini laparotomy. Results A total of 549 patients were identified, including 489 patients in the OPD group and 60 patients in the LPD group. 60 patients were identified who underwent LPD between 2010 and 2015 versus 60 OPD patients operated in the same period. Median overall operation time was shorter in the LPD group than with OPD patients (LPD 352 vs. OPD 397 min; p = 0.002). Overall transfusion units were lower in the LPD group (LPD range 0 – 4 vs. OPD range 0 – 11; p = 0.032). Intensive care unit stay (LPD 1 vs. OPD 6 d; p = 0.008) and overall hospital stay (OHS: LPD 14 vs. OPD 18 d; p = 0.012) were shorter in the LPD groups than in the OPD group. As regards postoperative complications, LPD was associated with reduced rates of clinically relevant grade B/C postoperative pancreatic fistula (LPD 15 vs. OPD 36%; p = 0.036) and grade B/C delayed gastric emptying (LPD 8 vs. OPD 20%; p = 0.049). A total of 56 patients were diagnosed with malignant disease. The number of harvested lymph nodes and R0-resection rates were equal for LPD and OPD patients. LPD patients showed a trend to improved median overall survival (LPD mean 56 months vs. OPD mean 48 months; p = 0.056). Conclusion Hybrid LPD is a safe procedure associated with a reduction in clinically relevant postoperative complications and allows faster recovery. Long term oncological outcome of hybrid LPD for malignant disease is equal to that with the standard open approach.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6193412
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61934122018-10-30 Perioperative and Long-term Oncological Results of Minimally Invasive Pancreatoduodenectomy as Hybrid Technique – A Matched Pair Analysis of 120 Cases Deichmann, Steffen Bolm, Louisa Romina Honselmann, Kim Christin Wellner, Ulrich Friedrich Lapshyn, Hryhoriy Keck, Tobias Bausch, Dirk Zentralbl Chir Background Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy is a highly challenging procedure. The aim of this study was to analyse post-operative morbidity and mortality as well as long term overall survival in patients undergoing hybrid LPD, as compared to open pancreaticoduodenecomy (OPD) in a single surgeon series. Methods Patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) in the period from 2000 to 2015 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. All LPD procedures were performed by one specialised pancreatic surgeon (TK). Patients were matched 1 : 1 for age, sex, BMI, ASA, histological diagnosis, pancreatic texture and portal venous resection (PVR). All LPD procedures were performed as hybrid LPD – combining laparoscopic resection and open reconstruction via mini laparotomy. Results A total of 549 patients were identified, including 489 patients in the OPD group and 60 patients in the LPD group. 60 patients were identified who underwent LPD between 2010 and 2015 versus 60 OPD patients operated in the same period. Median overall operation time was shorter in the LPD group than with OPD patients (LPD 352 vs. OPD 397 min; p = 0.002). Overall transfusion units were lower in the LPD group (LPD range 0 – 4 vs. OPD range 0 – 11; p = 0.032). Intensive care unit stay (LPD 1 vs. OPD 6 d; p = 0.008) and overall hospital stay (OHS: LPD 14 vs. OPD 18 d; p = 0.012) were shorter in the LPD groups than in the OPD group. As regards postoperative complications, LPD was associated with reduced rates of clinically relevant grade B/C postoperative pancreatic fistula (LPD 15 vs. OPD 36%; p = 0.036) and grade B/C delayed gastric emptying (LPD 8 vs. OPD 20%; p = 0.049). A total of 56 patients were diagnosed with malignant disease. The number of harvested lymph nodes and R0-resection rates were equal for LPD and OPD patients. LPD patients showed a trend to improved median overall survival (LPD mean 56 months vs. OPD mean 48 months; p = 0.056). Conclusion Hybrid LPD is a safe procedure associated with a reduction in clinically relevant postoperative complications and allows faster recovery. Long term oncological outcome of hybrid LPD for malignant disease is equal to that with the standard open approach. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2018-04 2018-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6193412/ /pubmed/29719907 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-124374 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Deichmann, Steffen
Bolm, Louisa Romina
Honselmann, Kim Christin
Wellner, Ulrich Friedrich
Lapshyn, Hryhoriy
Keck, Tobias
Bausch, Dirk
Perioperative and Long-term Oncological Results of Minimally Invasive Pancreatoduodenectomy as Hybrid Technique – A Matched Pair Analysis of 120 Cases
title Perioperative and Long-term Oncological Results of Minimally Invasive Pancreatoduodenectomy as Hybrid Technique – A Matched Pair Analysis of 120 Cases
title_full Perioperative and Long-term Oncological Results of Minimally Invasive Pancreatoduodenectomy as Hybrid Technique – A Matched Pair Analysis of 120 Cases
title_fullStr Perioperative and Long-term Oncological Results of Minimally Invasive Pancreatoduodenectomy as Hybrid Technique – A Matched Pair Analysis of 120 Cases
title_full_unstemmed Perioperative and Long-term Oncological Results of Minimally Invasive Pancreatoduodenectomy as Hybrid Technique – A Matched Pair Analysis of 120 Cases
title_short Perioperative and Long-term Oncological Results of Minimally Invasive Pancreatoduodenectomy as Hybrid Technique – A Matched Pair Analysis of 120 Cases
title_sort perioperative and long-term oncological results of minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy as hybrid technique – a matched pair analysis of 120 cases
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6193412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29719907
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-124374
work_keys_str_mv AT deichmannsteffen perioperativeandlongtermoncologicalresultsofminimallyinvasivepancreatoduodenectomyashybridtechniqueamatchedpairanalysisof120cases
AT bolmlouisaromina perioperativeandlongtermoncologicalresultsofminimallyinvasivepancreatoduodenectomyashybridtechniqueamatchedpairanalysisof120cases
AT honselmannkimchristin perioperativeandlongtermoncologicalresultsofminimallyinvasivepancreatoduodenectomyashybridtechniqueamatchedpairanalysisof120cases
AT wellnerulrichfriedrich perioperativeandlongtermoncologicalresultsofminimallyinvasivepancreatoduodenectomyashybridtechniqueamatchedpairanalysisof120cases
AT lapshynhryhoriy perioperativeandlongtermoncologicalresultsofminimallyinvasivepancreatoduodenectomyashybridtechniqueamatchedpairanalysisof120cases
AT kecktobias perioperativeandlongtermoncologicalresultsofminimallyinvasivepancreatoduodenectomyashybridtechniqueamatchedpairanalysisof120cases
AT bauschdirk perioperativeandlongtermoncologicalresultsofminimallyinvasivepancreatoduodenectomyashybridtechniqueamatchedpairanalysisof120cases