Cargando…

Patient positioning during minimally invasive surgery: what is current best practice?

INTRODUCTION: Positioning injuries are a known surgical complication and can result in significant patient morbidity. Studies have shown a small but significant number of neurovascular injuries associated with minimally invasive surgery, due to both patient and case-specific factors. We sought to re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zillioux, Jacqueline M, Krupski, Tracey L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6193419/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30697565
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RSRR.S115239
_version_ 1783364067833937920
author Zillioux, Jacqueline M
Krupski, Tracey L
author_facet Zillioux, Jacqueline M
Krupski, Tracey L
author_sort Zillioux, Jacqueline M
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Positioning injuries are a known surgical complication and can result in significant patient morbidity. Studies have shown a small but significant number of neurovascular injuries associated with minimally invasive surgery, due to both patient and case-specific factors. We sought to review the available literature in regards to pathophysiological and practical recommendations. METHODS: A literature search was conducted and categorized by level of evidence, with emphasis on prospective studies. The result comprised 14 studies, which were summarized and analyzed with respect to our study objectives. RESULTS: While incidence of positioning injury has been identified in up to one-third of prospective populations, its true prevalence after surgery is likely 2%–5%. The mechanism is thought to be intraneural disruption from stretching or pressure, which results in decreased perfusion. On a larger scale, this vascular compromise can lead to ischemia and rhabdomyolysis. Prevention hinges on addressing patient modifiable factors such as body mass index, judicious positioning with appropriate devices, and intraoperative team awareness consisting of recurrent extremity checks and time management. CONCLUSION: The risk for positioning injuries is underappreciated. Surgeons who perform minimally invasive surgery should discuss the potential for these complications with their patients, and operative teams should take steps to minimize risk factors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6193419
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61934192019-01-29 Patient positioning during minimally invasive surgery: what is current best practice? Zillioux, Jacqueline M Krupski, Tracey L Robot Surg Review INTRODUCTION: Positioning injuries are a known surgical complication and can result in significant patient morbidity. Studies have shown a small but significant number of neurovascular injuries associated with minimally invasive surgery, due to both patient and case-specific factors. We sought to review the available literature in regards to pathophysiological and practical recommendations. METHODS: A literature search was conducted and categorized by level of evidence, with emphasis on prospective studies. The result comprised 14 studies, which were summarized and analyzed with respect to our study objectives. RESULTS: While incidence of positioning injury has been identified in up to one-third of prospective populations, its true prevalence after surgery is likely 2%–5%. The mechanism is thought to be intraneural disruption from stretching or pressure, which results in decreased perfusion. On a larger scale, this vascular compromise can lead to ischemia and rhabdomyolysis. Prevention hinges on addressing patient modifiable factors such as body mass index, judicious positioning with appropriate devices, and intraoperative team awareness consisting of recurrent extremity checks and time management. CONCLUSION: The risk for positioning injuries is underappreciated. Surgeons who perform minimally invasive surgery should discuss the potential for these complications with their patients, and operative teams should take steps to minimize risk factors. Dove Medical Press 2017-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6193419/ /pubmed/30697565 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RSRR.S115239 Text en © 2017 Zillioux and Krupski. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Review
Zillioux, Jacqueline M
Krupski, Tracey L
Patient positioning during minimally invasive surgery: what is current best practice?
title Patient positioning during minimally invasive surgery: what is current best practice?
title_full Patient positioning during minimally invasive surgery: what is current best practice?
title_fullStr Patient positioning during minimally invasive surgery: what is current best practice?
title_full_unstemmed Patient positioning during minimally invasive surgery: what is current best practice?
title_short Patient positioning during minimally invasive surgery: what is current best practice?
title_sort patient positioning during minimally invasive surgery: what is current best practice?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6193419/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30697565
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RSRR.S115239
work_keys_str_mv AT zilliouxjacquelinem patientpositioningduringminimallyinvasivesurgerywhatiscurrentbestpractice
AT krupskitraceyl patientpositioningduringminimallyinvasivesurgerywhatiscurrentbestpractice