Cargando…

Management of pelvic organ prolapse in the elderly – is there a role for robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy?

Abdominal sacrocolpopexy is considered the gold standard treatment for symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Since its introduction, robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy has emerged as a popular minimally invasive alternative to open repair. Epidemiologic data suggest that the number of women seeking...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Narins, Hadley, Danforth, Teresa L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6193441/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30697557
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RSRR.S81584
_version_ 1783364072210694144
author Narins, Hadley
Danforth, Teresa L
author_facet Narins, Hadley
Danforth, Teresa L
author_sort Narins, Hadley
collection PubMed
description Abdominal sacrocolpopexy is considered the gold standard treatment for symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Since its introduction, robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy has emerged as a popular minimally invasive alternative to open repair. Epidemiologic data suggest that the number of women seeking surgical treatment for POP will increase to ~50% by 2050, and many of these women will be elderly. Advanced age should not preclude elective POP surgery. Substantial data suggest that medical comorbidities and other preoperative markers may be more important than age in predicting adverse surgical outcomes. POP surgery in the elderly has been extensively studied and found to be safe, but there is a paucity of information regarding robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy in this population. Data are only beginning to emerge regarding the safety and efficacy of robotic surgery in the elderly, with most studies focusing on oncologic procedures. Preliminary studies in this setting suggest that elderly patients may benefit from a minimally invasive approach, although given their limited physiologic reserves, appropriate patient selection is essential. The purpose of this review article is to evaluate the stepwise management of POP in the elderly female, with a focus on the safety and feasibility of a robotic approach.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6193441
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61934412019-01-29 Management of pelvic organ prolapse in the elderly – is there a role for robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy? Narins, Hadley Danforth, Teresa L Robot Surg Review Abdominal sacrocolpopexy is considered the gold standard treatment for symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Since its introduction, robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy has emerged as a popular minimally invasive alternative to open repair. Epidemiologic data suggest that the number of women seeking surgical treatment for POP will increase to ~50% by 2050, and many of these women will be elderly. Advanced age should not preclude elective POP surgery. Substantial data suggest that medical comorbidities and other preoperative markers may be more important than age in predicting adverse surgical outcomes. POP surgery in the elderly has been extensively studied and found to be safe, but there is a paucity of information regarding robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy in this population. Data are only beginning to emerge regarding the safety and efficacy of robotic surgery in the elderly, with most studies focusing on oncologic procedures. Preliminary studies in this setting suggest that elderly patients may benefit from a minimally invasive approach, although given their limited physiologic reserves, appropriate patient selection is essential. The purpose of this review article is to evaluate the stepwise management of POP in the elderly female, with a focus on the safety and feasibility of a robotic approach. Dove Medical Press 2016-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6193441/ /pubmed/30697557 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RSRR.S81584 Text en © 2016 Narins and Danforth. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Review
Narins, Hadley
Danforth, Teresa L
Management of pelvic organ prolapse in the elderly – is there a role for robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy?
title Management of pelvic organ prolapse in the elderly – is there a role for robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy?
title_full Management of pelvic organ prolapse in the elderly – is there a role for robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy?
title_fullStr Management of pelvic organ prolapse in the elderly – is there a role for robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy?
title_full_unstemmed Management of pelvic organ prolapse in the elderly – is there a role for robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy?
title_short Management of pelvic organ prolapse in the elderly – is there a role for robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy?
title_sort management of pelvic organ prolapse in the elderly – is there a role for robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6193441/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30697557
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RSRR.S81584
work_keys_str_mv AT narinshadley managementofpelvicorganprolapseintheelderlyistherearoleforroboticassistedsacrocolpopexy
AT danforthteresal managementofpelvicorganprolapseintheelderlyistherearoleforroboticassistedsacrocolpopexy