Cargando…
Cell stimulation versus cell death induced by sequential treatments with pulsed electric fields and cold atmospheric pressure plasma
Pulsed electric fields (PEFs) and cold atmospheric pressure plasma (CAP) are currently both investigated for medical applications. The exposure of cells to PEFs can induce the formation of pores in cell membranes and consequently facilitate the uptake of molecules. In contrast, CAP mainly acts throu...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6193580/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30312292 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204916 |
_version_ | 1783364081664655360 |
---|---|
author | Steuer, Anna Wolff, Christina M. von Woedtke, Thomas Weltmann, Klaus-Dieter Kolb, Juergen F. |
author_facet | Steuer, Anna Wolff, Christina M. von Woedtke, Thomas Weltmann, Klaus-Dieter Kolb, Juergen F. |
author_sort | Steuer, Anna |
collection | PubMed |
description | Pulsed electric fields (PEFs) and cold atmospheric pressure plasma (CAP) are currently both investigated for medical applications. The exposure of cells to PEFs can induce the formation of pores in cell membranes and consequently facilitate the uptake of molecules. In contrast, CAP mainly acts through reactive species that are generated in the liquid environment. The objective of this study was to determine, if PEFs combined with plasma-treated cell culture medium can mutually reinforce effects on viability of mammalian cells. Experiments were conducted with rat liver epithelial WB-F344 cells and their tumorigenic counterpart WB-ras for a direct comparison of non-tumorigenic and tumorigenic cells from the same origin. Viability after treatments strongly depended on cell type and applied field strength. Notably, tumorigenic WB-ras cells responded more sensitive to the respective treatments than non-tumorigenic WB-F344 cells. More cells were killed when plasma-treated medium was applied first in combination with treatments with 100-μs PEFs. For the reversed treatment order, i.e. application of PEFs first, the combination with 100-ns PEFs resulted in a stimulating effect for non-tumorigenic but not for tumorigenic cells. The results suggest that other mechanisms, besides simple pore formation, contributed to the mutually reinforcing effects of the two methods. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6193580 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61935802018-11-05 Cell stimulation versus cell death induced by sequential treatments with pulsed electric fields and cold atmospheric pressure plasma Steuer, Anna Wolff, Christina M. von Woedtke, Thomas Weltmann, Klaus-Dieter Kolb, Juergen F. PLoS One Research Article Pulsed electric fields (PEFs) and cold atmospheric pressure plasma (CAP) are currently both investigated for medical applications. The exposure of cells to PEFs can induce the formation of pores in cell membranes and consequently facilitate the uptake of molecules. In contrast, CAP mainly acts through reactive species that are generated in the liquid environment. The objective of this study was to determine, if PEFs combined with plasma-treated cell culture medium can mutually reinforce effects on viability of mammalian cells. Experiments were conducted with rat liver epithelial WB-F344 cells and their tumorigenic counterpart WB-ras for a direct comparison of non-tumorigenic and tumorigenic cells from the same origin. Viability after treatments strongly depended on cell type and applied field strength. Notably, tumorigenic WB-ras cells responded more sensitive to the respective treatments than non-tumorigenic WB-F344 cells. More cells were killed when plasma-treated medium was applied first in combination with treatments with 100-μs PEFs. For the reversed treatment order, i.e. application of PEFs first, the combination with 100-ns PEFs resulted in a stimulating effect for non-tumorigenic but not for tumorigenic cells. The results suggest that other mechanisms, besides simple pore formation, contributed to the mutually reinforcing effects of the two methods. Public Library of Science 2018-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6193580/ /pubmed/30312292 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204916 Text en © 2018 Steuer et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Steuer, Anna Wolff, Christina M. von Woedtke, Thomas Weltmann, Klaus-Dieter Kolb, Juergen F. Cell stimulation versus cell death induced by sequential treatments with pulsed electric fields and cold atmospheric pressure plasma |
title | Cell stimulation versus cell death induced by sequential treatments with pulsed electric fields and cold atmospheric pressure plasma |
title_full | Cell stimulation versus cell death induced by sequential treatments with pulsed electric fields and cold atmospheric pressure plasma |
title_fullStr | Cell stimulation versus cell death induced by sequential treatments with pulsed electric fields and cold atmospheric pressure plasma |
title_full_unstemmed | Cell stimulation versus cell death induced by sequential treatments with pulsed electric fields and cold atmospheric pressure plasma |
title_short | Cell stimulation versus cell death induced by sequential treatments with pulsed electric fields and cold atmospheric pressure plasma |
title_sort | cell stimulation versus cell death induced by sequential treatments with pulsed electric fields and cold atmospheric pressure plasma |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6193580/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30312292 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204916 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT steueranna cellstimulationversuscelldeathinducedbysequentialtreatmentswithpulsedelectricfieldsandcoldatmosphericpressureplasma AT wolffchristinam cellstimulationversuscelldeathinducedbysequentialtreatmentswithpulsedelectricfieldsandcoldatmosphericpressureplasma AT vonwoedtkethomas cellstimulationversuscelldeathinducedbysequentialtreatmentswithpulsedelectricfieldsandcoldatmosphericpressureplasma AT weltmannklausdieter cellstimulationversuscelldeathinducedbysequentialtreatmentswithpulsedelectricfieldsandcoldatmosphericpressureplasma AT kolbjuergenf cellstimulationversuscelldeathinducedbysequentialtreatmentswithpulsedelectricfieldsandcoldatmosphericpressureplasma |