Cargando…

Cell stimulation versus cell death induced by sequential treatments with pulsed electric fields and cold atmospheric pressure plasma

Pulsed electric fields (PEFs) and cold atmospheric pressure plasma (CAP) are currently both investigated for medical applications. The exposure of cells to PEFs can induce the formation of pores in cell membranes and consequently facilitate the uptake of molecules. In contrast, CAP mainly acts throu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Steuer, Anna, Wolff, Christina M., von Woedtke, Thomas, Weltmann, Klaus-Dieter, Kolb, Juergen F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6193580/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30312292
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204916
_version_ 1783364081664655360
author Steuer, Anna
Wolff, Christina M.
von Woedtke, Thomas
Weltmann, Klaus-Dieter
Kolb, Juergen F.
author_facet Steuer, Anna
Wolff, Christina M.
von Woedtke, Thomas
Weltmann, Klaus-Dieter
Kolb, Juergen F.
author_sort Steuer, Anna
collection PubMed
description Pulsed electric fields (PEFs) and cold atmospheric pressure plasma (CAP) are currently both investigated for medical applications. The exposure of cells to PEFs can induce the formation of pores in cell membranes and consequently facilitate the uptake of molecules. In contrast, CAP mainly acts through reactive species that are generated in the liquid environment. The objective of this study was to determine, if PEFs combined with plasma-treated cell culture medium can mutually reinforce effects on viability of mammalian cells. Experiments were conducted with rat liver epithelial WB-F344 cells and their tumorigenic counterpart WB-ras for a direct comparison of non-tumorigenic and tumorigenic cells from the same origin. Viability after treatments strongly depended on cell type and applied field strength. Notably, tumorigenic WB-ras cells responded more sensitive to the respective treatments than non-tumorigenic WB-F344 cells. More cells were killed when plasma-treated medium was applied first in combination with treatments with 100-μs PEFs. For the reversed treatment order, i.e. application of PEFs first, the combination with 100-ns PEFs resulted in a stimulating effect for non-tumorigenic but not for tumorigenic cells. The results suggest that other mechanisms, besides simple pore formation, contributed to the mutually reinforcing effects of the two methods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6193580
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61935802018-11-05 Cell stimulation versus cell death induced by sequential treatments with pulsed electric fields and cold atmospheric pressure plasma Steuer, Anna Wolff, Christina M. von Woedtke, Thomas Weltmann, Klaus-Dieter Kolb, Juergen F. PLoS One Research Article Pulsed electric fields (PEFs) and cold atmospheric pressure plasma (CAP) are currently both investigated for medical applications. The exposure of cells to PEFs can induce the formation of pores in cell membranes and consequently facilitate the uptake of molecules. In contrast, CAP mainly acts through reactive species that are generated in the liquid environment. The objective of this study was to determine, if PEFs combined with plasma-treated cell culture medium can mutually reinforce effects on viability of mammalian cells. Experiments were conducted with rat liver epithelial WB-F344 cells and their tumorigenic counterpart WB-ras for a direct comparison of non-tumorigenic and tumorigenic cells from the same origin. Viability after treatments strongly depended on cell type and applied field strength. Notably, tumorigenic WB-ras cells responded more sensitive to the respective treatments than non-tumorigenic WB-F344 cells. More cells were killed when plasma-treated medium was applied first in combination with treatments with 100-μs PEFs. For the reversed treatment order, i.e. application of PEFs first, the combination with 100-ns PEFs resulted in a stimulating effect for non-tumorigenic but not for tumorigenic cells. The results suggest that other mechanisms, besides simple pore formation, contributed to the mutually reinforcing effects of the two methods. Public Library of Science 2018-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6193580/ /pubmed/30312292 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204916 Text en © 2018 Steuer et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Steuer, Anna
Wolff, Christina M.
von Woedtke, Thomas
Weltmann, Klaus-Dieter
Kolb, Juergen F.
Cell stimulation versus cell death induced by sequential treatments with pulsed electric fields and cold atmospheric pressure plasma
title Cell stimulation versus cell death induced by sequential treatments with pulsed electric fields and cold atmospheric pressure plasma
title_full Cell stimulation versus cell death induced by sequential treatments with pulsed electric fields and cold atmospheric pressure plasma
title_fullStr Cell stimulation versus cell death induced by sequential treatments with pulsed electric fields and cold atmospheric pressure plasma
title_full_unstemmed Cell stimulation versus cell death induced by sequential treatments with pulsed electric fields and cold atmospheric pressure plasma
title_short Cell stimulation versus cell death induced by sequential treatments with pulsed electric fields and cold atmospheric pressure plasma
title_sort cell stimulation versus cell death induced by sequential treatments with pulsed electric fields and cold atmospheric pressure plasma
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6193580/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30312292
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204916
work_keys_str_mv AT steueranna cellstimulationversuscelldeathinducedbysequentialtreatmentswithpulsedelectricfieldsandcoldatmosphericpressureplasma
AT wolffchristinam cellstimulationversuscelldeathinducedbysequentialtreatmentswithpulsedelectricfieldsandcoldatmosphericpressureplasma
AT vonwoedtkethomas cellstimulationversuscelldeathinducedbysequentialtreatmentswithpulsedelectricfieldsandcoldatmosphericpressureplasma
AT weltmannklausdieter cellstimulationversuscelldeathinducedbysequentialtreatmentswithpulsedelectricfieldsandcoldatmosphericpressureplasma
AT kolbjuergenf cellstimulationversuscelldeathinducedbysequentialtreatmentswithpulsedelectricfieldsandcoldatmosphericpressureplasma