Cargando…
The Why We Retweet scale
BACKGROUND: Twitter offers a platform for rapid diffusion of information and its users' attitudes and behaviors. Insights about information propagation via retweets (the message forwarding function) offer observable explanations of ways in which modern human interactions get organized in the fo...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6193720/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30335827 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206076 |
_version_ | 1783364116697579520 |
---|---|
author | Majmundar, Anuja Allem, Jon-Patrick Boley Cruz, Tess Unger, Jennifer Beth |
author_facet | Majmundar, Anuja Allem, Jon-Patrick Boley Cruz, Tess Unger, Jennifer Beth |
author_sort | Majmundar, Anuja |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Twitter offers a platform for rapid diffusion of information and its users' attitudes and behaviors. Insights about information propagation via retweets (the message forwarding function) offer observable explanations of ways in which modern human interactions get organized in the form of online networks, and contextualized in the form of public health, policy decisions, disaster management, and civic participation. This study conceptualized and validated the Why We Retweet Scale to contextualize retweeting behavior. OBJECTIVE: Twitter users were identified using clustering algorithms that consider a users’ position in their network and invited for an online survey. Participants (N = 1433) responded to 19 questions about why they retweet. Exploratory factor Analysis (EFA) was conducted on a scale development sample (70% of original sample), which informed the Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) on a scale testing sample (30% of the original sample). Varimax rotation was used to obtain a rotated factor solution, which resulted in interpretable factors. Demographic differences among scale factors were analyzed using one-way ANOVA or independent samples t-tests. RESULTS: The final model (χ(2)(21) = 28, RMSEA = .03 [90% CI, 0.00–0.06], CFA = .99, TLI = 0.99) represented a parsimonious solution with 4 factors, measured by 2–3 items each, creating a final scale consisting of 9 items. Factor labels and definitions were: (1) Show approval, “Show support to the tweeter”; (2) Argue, “To argue against a tweet that I disagree with”; (3) Gain attention, “Add followers or gain attention”; and (4) Entertain, “Create humor/amusement”. Demographic differences were also reported. CONCLUSIONS: The Why We Retweet Scale offers a useful conceptualization and assessment of motivations for retweeting. In the future, communication strategists might consider the factors associated with information propagation when designing campaign messages to maximize message reach and engagement on Twitter. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6193720 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61937202018-11-05 The Why We Retweet scale Majmundar, Anuja Allem, Jon-Patrick Boley Cruz, Tess Unger, Jennifer Beth PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Twitter offers a platform for rapid diffusion of information and its users' attitudes and behaviors. Insights about information propagation via retweets (the message forwarding function) offer observable explanations of ways in which modern human interactions get organized in the form of online networks, and contextualized in the form of public health, policy decisions, disaster management, and civic participation. This study conceptualized and validated the Why We Retweet Scale to contextualize retweeting behavior. OBJECTIVE: Twitter users were identified using clustering algorithms that consider a users’ position in their network and invited for an online survey. Participants (N = 1433) responded to 19 questions about why they retweet. Exploratory factor Analysis (EFA) was conducted on a scale development sample (70% of original sample), which informed the Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) on a scale testing sample (30% of the original sample). Varimax rotation was used to obtain a rotated factor solution, which resulted in interpretable factors. Demographic differences among scale factors were analyzed using one-way ANOVA or independent samples t-tests. RESULTS: The final model (χ(2)(21) = 28, RMSEA = .03 [90% CI, 0.00–0.06], CFA = .99, TLI = 0.99) represented a parsimonious solution with 4 factors, measured by 2–3 items each, creating a final scale consisting of 9 items. Factor labels and definitions were: (1) Show approval, “Show support to the tweeter”; (2) Argue, “To argue against a tweet that I disagree with”; (3) Gain attention, “Add followers or gain attention”; and (4) Entertain, “Create humor/amusement”. Demographic differences were also reported. CONCLUSIONS: The Why We Retweet Scale offers a useful conceptualization and assessment of motivations for retweeting. In the future, communication strategists might consider the factors associated with information propagation when designing campaign messages to maximize message reach and engagement on Twitter. Public Library of Science 2018-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6193720/ /pubmed/30335827 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206076 Text en © 2018 Majmundar et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Majmundar, Anuja Allem, Jon-Patrick Boley Cruz, Tess Unger, Jennifer Beth The Why We Retweet scale |
title | The Why We Retweet scale |
title_full | The Why We Retweet scale |
title_fullStr | The Why We Retweet scale |
title_full_unstemmed | The Why We Retweet scale |
title_short | The Why We Retweet scale |
title_sort | why we retweet scale |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6193720/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30335827 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206076 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT majmundaranuja thewhyweretweetscale AT allemjonpatrick thewhyweretweetscale AT boleycruztess thewhyweretweetscale AT ungerjenniferbeth thewhyweretweetscale AT majmundaranuja whyweretweetscale AT allemjonpatrick whyweretweetscale AT boleycruztess whyweretweetscale AT ungerjenniferbeth whyweretweetscale |