Cargando…

Repeatability, reproducibility and agreement of foveal avascular zone measurements using three different optical coherence tomography angiography devices

PURPOSE: To evaluate the repeatability, the reproducibility and the agreement of foveal avascular zone (FAZ) measurements using three different optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) devices. PROCEDURES: This prospective study included 24 eyes of 24 healthy volunteers. OCT-A imaging was pe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mihailovic, Natasa, Brand, Cristin, Lahme, Larissa, Schubert, Friederike, Bormann, Eike, Eter, Nicole, Alnawaiseh, Maged
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6193722/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30335839
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206045
_version_ 1783364117175730176
author Mihailovic, Natasa
Brand, Cristin
Lahme, Larissa
Schubert, Friederike
Bormann, Eike
Eter, Nicole
Alnawaiseh, Maged
author_facet Mihailovic, Natasa
Brand, Cristin
Lahme, Larissa
Schubert, Friederike
Bormann, Eike
Eter, Nicole
Alnawaiseh, Maged
author_sort Mihailovic, Natasa
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the repeatability, the reproducibility and the agreement of foveal avascular zone (FAZ) measurements using three different optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) devices. PROCEDURES: This prospective study included 24 eyes of 24 healthy volunteers. OCT-A imaging was performed using RTVue XR Avanti, Canon OCT-HS100 and Spectralis OCT-A. Repeated measurements were performed under the same conditions on two separate days, and the area of the FAZ was determined and analyzed using the above devices. RESULTS: All three devices showed a high ICC and there was no significant difference between the ICCs (pairwise comparison) of the three devices (Optovue–Canon (p = 0.66); Canon–Heidelberg (p = 0.21); Heidelberg–Optovue (p = 0.37). Agreement analysis of the three devices revealed a significant elevation of FAZ area values with the Heidelberg device and a slight underestimation of the FAZ area with the Canon device. Nevertheless, overall we found a high level of agreement between all of the three devices (ICC ≥ 0.958 (0.905–0.982)). CONCLUSIONS: Good reproducibility and repeatability were observed for all three devices. However, the agreement analysis revealed slight, but significant differences, which might limit alternating use of these devices for clinical research and follow-up examinations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6193722
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61937222018-11-05 Repeatability, reproducibility and agreement of foveal avascular zone measurements using three different optical coherence tomography angiography devices Mihailovic, Natasa Brand, Cristin Lahme, Larissa Schubert, Friederike Bormann, Eike Eter, Nicole Alnawaiseh, Maged PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: To evaluate the repeatability, the reproducibility and the agreement of foveal avascular zone (FAZ) measurements using three different optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) devices. PROCEDURES: This prospective study included 24 eyes of 24 healthy volunteers. OCT-A imaging was performed using RTVue XR Avanti, Canon OCT-HS100 and Spectralis OCT-A. Repeated measurements were performed under the same conditions on two separate days, and the area of the FAZ was determined and analyzed using the above devices. RESULTS: All three devices showed a high ICC and there was no significant difference between the ICCs (pairwise comparison) of the three devices (Optovue–Canon (p = 0.66); Canon–Heidelberg (p = 0.21); Heidelberg–Optovue (p = 0.37). Agreement analysis of the three devices revealed a significant elevation of FAZ area values with the Heidelberg device and a slight underestimation of the FAZ area with the Canon device. Nevertheless, overall we found a high level of agreement between all of the three devices (ICC ≥ 0.958 (0.905–0.982)). CONCLUSIONS: Good reproducibility and repeatability were observed for all three devices. However, the agreement analysis revealed slight, but significant differences, which might limit alternating use of these devices for clinical research and follow-up examinations. Public Library of Science 2018-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6193722/ /pubmed/30335839 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206045 Text en © 2018 Mihailovic et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mihailovic, Natasa
Brand, Cristin
Lahme, Larissa
Schubert, Friederike
Bormann, Eike
Eter, Nicole
Alnawaiseh, Maged
Repeatability, reproducibility and agreement of foveal avascular zone measurements using three different optical coherence tomography angiography devices
title Repeatability, reproducibility and agreement of foveal avascular zone measurements using three different optical coherence tomography angiography devices
title_full Repeatability, reproducibility and agreement of foveal avascular zone measurements using three different optical coherence tomography angiography devices
title_fullStr Repeatability, reproducibility and agreement of foveal avascular zone measurements using three different optical coherence tomography angiography devices
title_full_unstemmed Repeatability, reproducibility and agreement of foveal avascular zone measurements using three different optical coherence tomography angiography devices
title_short Repeatability, reproducibility and agreement of foveal avascular zone measurements using three different optical coherence tomography angiography devices
title_sort repeatability, reproducibility and agreement of foveal avascular zone measurements using three different optical coherence tomography angiography devices
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6193722/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30335839
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206045
work_keys_str_mv AT mihailovicnatasa repeatabilityreproducibilityandagreementoffovealavascularzonemeasurementsusingthreedifferentopticalcoherencetomographyangiographydevices
AT brandcristin repeatabilityreproducibilityandagreementoffovealavascularzonemeasurementsusingthreedifferentopticalcoherencetomographyangiographydevices
AT lahmelarissa repeatabilityreproducibilityandagreementoffovealavascularzonemeasurementsusingthreedifferentopticalcoherencetomographyangiographydevices
AT schubertfriederike repeatabilityreproducibilityandagreementoffovealavascularzonemeasurementsusingthreedifferentopticalcoherencetomographyangiographydevices
AT bormanneike repeatabilityreproducibilityandagreementoffovealavascularzonemeasurementsusingthreedifferentopticalcoherencetomographyangiographydevices
AT eternicole repeatabilityreproducibilityandagreementoffovealavascularzonemeasurementsusingthreedifferentopticalcoherencetomographyangiographydevices
AT alnawaisehmaged repeatabilityreproducibilityandagreementoffovealavascularzonemeasurementsusingthreedifferentopticalcoherencetomographyangiographydevices