Cargando…
Repeatability, reproducibility and agreement of foveal avascular zone measurements using three different optical coherence tomography angiography devices
PURPOSE: To evaluate the repeatability, the reproducibility and the agreement of foveal avascular zone (FAZ) measurements using three different optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) devices. PROCEDURES: This prospective study included 24 eyes of 24 healthy volunteers. OCT-A imaging was pe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6193722/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30335839 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206045 |
_version_ | 1783364117175730176 |
---|---|
author | Mihailovic, Natasa Brand, Cristin Lahme, Larissa Schubert, Friederike Bormann, Eike Eter, Nicole Alnawaiseh, Maged |
author_facet | Mihailovic, Natasa Brand, Cristin Lahme, Larissa Schubert, Friederike Bormann, Eike Eter, Nicole Alnawaiseh, Maged |
author_sort | Mihailovic, Natasa |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To evaluate the repeatability, the reproducibility and the agreement of foveal avascular zone (FAZ) measurements using three different optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) devices. PROCEDURES: This prospective study included 24 eyes of 24 healthy volunteers. OCT-A imaging was performed using RTVue XR Avanti, Canon OCT-HS100 and Spectralis OCT-A. Repeated measurements were performed under the same conditions on two separate days, and the area of the FAZ was determined and analyzed using the above devices. RESULTS: All three devices showed a high ICC and there was no significant difference between the ICCs (pairwise comparison) of the three devices (Optovue–Canon (p = 0.66); Canon–Heidelberg (p = 0.21); Heidelberg–Optovue (p = 0.37). Agreement analysis of the three devices revealed a significant elevation of FAZ area values with the Heidelberg device and a slight underestimation of the FAZ area with the Canon device. Nevertheless, overall we found a high level of agreement between all of the three devices (ICC ≥ 0.958 (0.905–0.982)). CONCLUSIONS: Good reproducibility and repeatability were observed for all three devices. However, the agreement analysis revealed slight, but significant differences, which might limit alternating use of these devices for clinical research and follow-up examinations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6193722 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61937222018-11-05 Repeatability, reproducibility and agreement of foveal avascular zone measurements using three different optical coherence tomography angiography devices Mihailovic, Natasa Brand, Cristin Lahme, Larissa Schubert, Friederike Bormann, Eike Eter, Nicole Alnawaiseh, Maged PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: To evaluate the repeatability, the reproducibility and the agreement of foveal avascular zone (FAZ) measurements using three different optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) devices. PROCEDURES: This prospective study included 24 eyes of 24 healthy volunteers. OCT-A imaging was performed using RTVue XR Avanti, Canon OCT-HS100 and Spectralis OCT-A. Repeated measurements were performed under the same conditions on two separate days, and the area of the FAZ was determined and analyzed using the above devices. RESULTS: All three devices showed a high ICC and there was no significant difference between the ICCs (pairwise comparison) of the three devices (Optovue–Canon (p = 0.66); Canon–Heidelberg (p = 0.21); Heidelberg–Optovue (p = 0.37). Agreement analysis of the three devices revealed a significant elevation of FAZ area values with the Heidelberg device and a slight underestimation of the FAZ area with the Canon device. Nevertheless, overall we found a high level of agreement between all of the three devices (ICC ≥ 0.958 (0.905–0.982)). CONCLUSIONS: Good reproducibility and repeatability were observed for all three devices. However, the agreement analysis revealed slight, but significant differences, which might limit alternating use of these devices for clinical research and follow-up examinations. Public Library of Science 2018-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6193722/ /pubmed/30335839 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206045 Text en © 2018 Mihailovic et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Mihailovic, Natasa Brand, Cristin Lahme, Larissa Schubert, Friederike Bormann, Eike Eter, Nicole Alnawaiseh, Maged Repeatability, reproducibility and agreement of foveal avascular zone measurements using three different optical coherence tomography angiography devices |
title | Repeatability, reproducibility and agreement of foveal avascular zone measurements using three different optical coherence tomography angiography devices |
title_full | Repeatability, reproducibility and agreement of foveal avascular zone measurements using three different optical coherence tomography angiography devices |
title_fullStr | Repeatability, reproducibility and agreement of foveal avascular zone measurements using three different optical coherence tomography angiography devices |
title_full_unstemmed | Repeatability, reproducibility and agreement of foveal avascular zone measurements using three different optical coherence tomography angiography devices |
title_short | Repeatability, reproducibility and agreement of foveal avascular zone measurements using three different optical coherence tomography angiography devices |
title_sort | repeatability, reproducibility and agreement of foveal avascular zone measurements using three different optical coherence tomography angiography devices |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6193722/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30335839 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206045 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mihailovicnatasa repeatabilityreproducibilityandagreementoffovealavascularzonemeasurementsusingthreedifferentopticalcoherencetomographyangiographydevices AT brandcristin repeatabilityreproducibilityandagreementoffovealavascularzonemeasurementsusingthreedifferentopticalcoherencetomographyangiographydevices AT lahmelarissa repeatabilityreproducibilityandagreementoffovealavascularzonemeasurementsusingthreedifferentopticalcoherencetomographyangiographydevices AT schubertfriederike repeatabilityreproducibilityandagreementoffovealavascularzonemeasurementsusingthreedifferentopticalcoherencetomographyangiographydevices AT bormanneike repeatabilityreproducibilityandagreementoffovealavascularzonemeasurementsusingthreedifferentopticalcoherencetomographyangiographydevices AT eternicole repeatabilityreproducibilityandagreementoffovealavascularzonemeasurementsusingthreedifferentopticalcoherencetomographyangiographydevices AT alnawaisehmaged repeatabilityreproducibilityandagreementoffovealavascularzonemeasurementsusingthreedifferentopticalcoherencetomographyangiographydevices |