Cargando…

Impact of Graft Steatosis on Postoperative Complications after Liver Transplantation

Background  Steatotic grafts are more susceptible to ischemia-reperfusion injury than are normal grafts. Therefore, using steatotic grafts for liver transplantation (LT) is associated with high primary dysfunction and decreased survival rates. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of graft...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahmed, Emad Ali, El-Badry, Ashraf Mohammad, Mocchegiani, Federico, Montalti, Roberto, Hassan, Asem Elsani Ali, Redwan, Alaa Ahmed, Vivarelli, Marco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Medical Publishers 2018
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6193803/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30474065
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1675236
_version_ 1783364125183705088
author Ahmed, Emad Ali
El-Badry, Ashraf Mohammad
Mocchegiani, Federico
Montalti, Roberto
Hassan, Asem Elsani Ali
Redwan, Alaa Ahmed
Vivarelli, Marco
author_facet Ahmed, Emad Ali
El-Badry, Ashraf Mohammad
Mocchegiani, Federico
Montalti, Roberto
Hassan, Asem Elsani Ali
Redwan, Alaa Ahmed
Vivarelli, Marco
author_sort Ahmed, Emad Ali
collection PubMed
description Background  Steatotic grafts are more susceptible to ischemia-reperfusion injury than are normal grafts. Therefore, using steatotic grafts for liver transplantation (LT) is associated with high primary dysfunction and decreased survival rates. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of graft steatosis on post LT outcomes. Methods  A retrospective cohort analysis of 271 LT recipients from 2005 to 2016 was performed and patients were classified based on two types of steatosis, macrosteatosis (MaS), and microsteatosis (MiS). Each category was subdivided into three groups according to the degree of steatosis: no (< 5%), mild (≥5 to < 30%), and moderate (≥30 to ≤60%). The primary hospital stays and 6-month postoperative complications were analyzed by the Clavien–Dindo classification system. Additionally, patient and graft survivals were studied. Results  Significant differences were observed in grade III MaS ( p -value = 0.019) and grade V MiS ( p -value = 0.020). A high trend of early graft dysfunction was found in the moderate MaS and MiS groups; however, they were not statistically significant ( p -value = 0.199 and 0.282, respectively). Interestingly, the acute cellular rejection (ACR) rate was found to be inversely proportional to the degree of steatosis in both categories but it did not reach a significant level ( p -value = 0.161 and 0.111, respectively). Conclusion  Excellent post LT long-term outcomes using grafts with mild and moderate steatosis were determined. Further studies are needed to evaluate the newly proposed relationship between ACR and steatosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6193803
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Thieme Medical Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61938032018-11-23 Impact of Graft Steatosis on Postoperative Complications after Liver Transplantation Ahmed, Emad Ali El-Badry, Ashraf Mohammad Mocchegiani, Federico Montalti, Roberto Hassan, Asem Elsani Ali Redwan, Alaa Ahmed Vivarelli, Marco Surg J (N Y) Background  Steatotic grafts are more susceptible to ischemia-reperfusion injury than are normal grafts. Therefore, using steatotic grafts for liver transplantation (LT) is associated with high primary dysfunction and decreased survival rates. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of graft steatosis on post LT outcomes. Methods  A retrospective cohort analysis of 271 LT recipients from 2005 to 2016 was performed and patients were classified based on two types of steatosis, macrosteatosis (MaS), and microsteatosis (MiS). Each category was subdivided into three groups according to the degree of steatosis: no (< 5%), mild (≥5 to < 30%), and moderate (≥30 to ≤60%). The primary hospital stays and 6-month postoperative complications were analyzed by the Clavien–Dindo classification system. Additionally, patient and graft survivals were studied. Results  Significant differences were observed in grade III MaS ( p -value = 0.019) and grade V MiS ( p -value = 0.020). A high trend of early graft dysfunction was found in the moderate MaS and MiS groups; however, they were not statistically significant ( p -value = 0.199 and 0.282, respectively). Interestingly, the acute cellular rejection (ACR) rate was found to be inversely proportional to the degree of steatosis in both categories but it did not reach a significant level ( p -value = 0.161 and 0.111, respectively). Conclusion  Excellent post LT long-term outcomes using grafts with mild and moderate steatosis were determined. Further studies are needed to evaluate the newly proposed relationship between ACR and steatosis. Thieme Medical Publishers 2018-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6193803/ /pubmed/30474065 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1675236 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Ahmed, Emad Ali
El-Badry, Ashraf Mohammad
Mocchegiani, Federico
Montalti, Roberto
Hassan, Asem Elsani Ali
Redwan, Alaa Ahmed
Vivarelli, Marco
Impact of Graft Steatosis on Postoperative Complications after Liver Transplantation
title Impact of Graft Steatosis on Postoperative Complications after Liver Transplantation
title_full Impact of Graft Steatosis on Postoperative Complications after Liver Transplantation
title_fullStr Impact of Graft Steatosis on Postoperative Complications after Liver Transplantation
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Graft Steatosis on Postoperative Complications after Liver Transplantation
title_short Impact of Graft Steatosis on Postoperative Complications after Liver Transplantation
title_sort impact of graft steatosis on postoperative complications after liver transplantation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6193803/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30474065
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1675236
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmedemadali impactofgraftsteatosisonpostoperativecomplicationsafterlivertransplantation
AT elbadryashrafmohammad impactofgraftsteatosisonpostoperativecomplicationsafterlivertransplantation
AT mocchegianifederico impactofgraftsteatosisonpostoperativecomplicationsafterlivertransplantation
AT montaltiroberto impactofgraftsteatosisonpostoperativecomplicationsafterlivertransplantation
AT hassanasemelsaniali impactofgraftsteatosisonpostoperativecomplicationsafterlivertransplantation
AT redwanalaaahmed impactofgraftsteatosisonpostoperativecomplicationsafterlivertransplantation
AT vivarellimarco impactofgraftsteatosisonpostoperativecomplicationsafterlivertransplantation