Cargando…
Sex Differences in Temporal but Not Spatial Attentional Capture
The accuracy of detecting or identifying a target decreases when a salient distractor is presented. This decrease is explained by the temporal or spatial diversion of attention to the distractor and thus is referred to as attentional capture. Using temporal and spatial visual search tasks, we examin...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6194159/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30369894 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01893 |
_version_ | 1783364181162983424 |
---|---|
author | Inukai, Tomoe Kawahara, Jun I. |
author_facet | Inukai, Tomoe Kawahara, Jun I. |
author_sort | Inukai, Tomoe |
collection | PubMed |
description | The accuracy of detecting or identifying a target decreases when a salient distractor is presented. This decrease is explained by the temporal or spatial diversion of attention to the distractor and thus is referred to as attentional capture. Using temporal and spatial visual search tasks, we examined whether there are sex differences in attentional capture. In Experiment 1A, a temporal visual search task measured attentional capture in the temporal domain by asking participants (97 men and 92 women) to identify a target embedded in a rapid stream of nontarget letters while ignoring a preceding peripheral distractor. In Experiment 2, a spatial visual search task measured attentional capture in the spatial domain by asking participants (146 men and 83 women) to detect a target among spatially distributed nontarget items while ignoring a distractor presented simultaneously. Our results indicate that attentional capture occurred in both tasks. In Experiment 1A, the magnitude of capture was significantly larger for women than men. In Experiment 1B, we confirmed sex differences in temporal attentional capture by recruiting a new set of participants (141 men and 85 women). In Experiment 2, the magnitude of capture was comparable between the sexes. These results suggest that women are more sensitive to bottom-up signals than men when they engage in a temporal search task and could be explained in terms of sex differences in the ability of adjusting the size of attentional window, within which attention is allocated to the most salient item. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6194159 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61941592018-10-26 Sex Differences in Temporal but Not Spatial Attentional Capture Inukai, Tomoe Kawahara, Jun I. Front Psychol Psychology The accuracy of detecting or identifying a target decreases when a salient distractor is presented. This decrease is explained by the temporal or spatial diversion of attention to the distractor and thus is referred to as attentional capture. Using temporal and spatial visual search tasks, we examined whether there are sex differences in attentional capture. In Experiment 1A, a temporal visual search task measured attentional capture in the temporal domain by asking participants (97 men and 92 women) to identify a target embedded in a rapid stream of nontarget letters while ignoring a preceding peripheral distractor. In Experiment 2, a spatial visual search task measured attentional capture in the spatial domain by asking participants (146 men and 83 women) to detect a target among spatially distributed nontarget items while ignoring a distractor presented simultaneously. Our results indicate that attentional capture occurred in both tasks. In Experiment 1A, the magnitude of capture was significantly larger for women than men. In Experiment 1B, we confirmed sex differences in temporal attentional capture by recruiting a new set of participants (141 men and 85 women). In Experiment 2, the magnitude of capture was comparable between the sexes. These results suggest that women are more sensitive to bottom-up signals than men when they engage in a temporal search task and could be explained in terms of sex differences in the ability of adjusting the size of attentional window, within which attention is allocated to the most salient item. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6194159/ /pubmed/30369894 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01893 Text en Copyright © 2018 Inukai and Kawahara. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Inukai, Tomoe Kawahara, Jun I. Sex Differences in Temporal but Not Spatial Attentional Capture |
title | Sex Differences in Temporal but Not Spatial Attentional Capture |
title_full | Sex Differences in Temporal but Not Spatial Attentional Capture |
title_fullStr | Sex Differences in Temporal but Not Spatial Attentional Capture |
title_full_unstemmed | Sex Differences in Temporal but Not Spatial Attentional Capture |
title_short | Sex Differences in Temporal but Not Spatial Attentional Capture |
title_sort | sex differences in temporal but not spatial attentional capture |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6194159/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30369894 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01893 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT inukaitomoe sexdifferencesintemporalbutnotspatialattentionalcapture AT kawaharajuni sexdifferencesintemporalbutnotspatialattentionalcapture |