Cargando…

Do Older Adults Select Appropriate Motor Strategies in a Stepping-Down Paradigm?

Selecting motor strategies in daily life tasks requires a perception of the task requirements as well as of one's own physical abilities. Age-related cognitive and physical changes may affect these perceptions. This might entail that some older adults select inappropriate movement strategies wh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kluft, Nick, Bruijn, Sjoerd M., van Dieën, Jaap H., Pijnappels, Mirjam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6194179/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30369885
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.01419
_version_ 1783364185967558656
author Kluft, Nick
Bruijn, Sjoerd M.
van Dieën, Jaap H.
Pijnappels, Mirjam
author_facet Kluft, Nick
Bruijn, Sjoerd M.
van Dieën, Jaap H.
Pijnappels, Mirjam
author_sort Kluft, Nick
collection PubMed
description Selecting motor strategies in daily life tasks requires a perception of the task requirements as well as of one's own physical abilities. Age-related cognitive and physical changes may affect these perceptions. This might entail that some older adults select inappropriate movement strategies when confronted with daily-life motor tasks, which could lead to balance loss or falls. We investigated whether older adults select motor strategies in accordance with their actual physical ability. Twenty-one older adults were subjected to a stepping down paradigm, in which full-body kinematics of selected and reactive behavior were recorded. Stepping down from a curb can be done with either (1) a relatively low effort but more balance threatening heel landing, or (2) a more controlled but more demanding toe landing. The probability of selecting a toe landing grows with an increase in curb height. We determined the curb height at which participants switched from heel to toe landing during expected stepping down over different heights as an indicator of their perceived ability. During an unexpected step down trial, participants encountered a step down of 0.1 m earlier than expected, because part of the walkway was removed and covered by a black cloth. We evaluated participants' actual physical ability from the reactive behavior, with performance defined as the reduction in kinetic energy between the peak value after landing and the onset of the next step. To unravel whether the selected motor strategies corresponded with actual physical ability, the ability to recover from the unexpected step down was correlated to the height at which the participants switched movement strategy. The switching height was not correlated to the ability to recover from an unexpected step down (ρ = 0.034, p = 0.877). This finding suggests that older adults do not select their movement strategy in stepping down based on their actual abilities, or have an imprecise perception of their actual abilities. Future research should evaluate whether inappropriate motor strategy selection in a stepping down paradigm can explain accidental falls in older adults.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6194179
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61941792018-10-26 Do Older Adults Select Appropriate Motor Strategies in a Stepping-Down Paradigm? Kluft, Nick Bruijn, Sjoerd M. van Dieën, Jaap H. Pijnappels, Mirjam Front Physiol Physiology Selecting motor strategies in daily life tasks requires a perception of the task requirements as well as of one's own physical abilities. Age-related cognitive and physical changes may affect these perceptions. This might entail that some older adults select inappropriate movement strategies when confronted with daily-life motor tasks, which could lead to balance loss or falls. We investigated whether older adults select motor strategies in accordance with their actual physical ability. Twenty-one older adults were subjected to a stepping down paradigm, in which full-body kinematics of selected and reactive behavior were recorded. Stepping down from a curb can be done with either (1) a relatively low effort but more balance threatening heel landing, or (2) a more controlled but more demanding toe landing. The probability of selecting a toe landing grows with an increase in curb height. We determined the curb height at which participants switched from heel to toe landing during expected stepping down over different heights as an indicator of their perceived ability. During an unexpected step down trial, participants encountered a step down of 0.1 m earlier than expected, because part of the walkway was removed and covered by a black cloth. We evaluated participants' actual physical ability from the reactive behavior, with performance defined as the reduction in kinetic energy between the peak value after landing and the onset of the next step. To unravel whether the selected motor strategies corresponded with actual physical ability, the ability to recover from the unexpected step down was correlated to the height at which the participants switched movement strategy. The switching height was not correlated to the ability to recover from an unexpected step down (ρ = 0.034, p = 0.877). This finding suggests that older adults do not select their movement strategy in stepping down based on their actual abilities, or have an imprecise perception of their actual abilities. Future research should evaluate whether inappropriate motor strategy selection in a stepping down paradigm can explain accidental falls in older adults. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6194179/ /pubmed/30369885 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.01419 Text en Copyright © 2018 Kluft, Bruijn, van Dieën and Pijnappels. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Kluft, Nick
Bruijn, Sjoerd M.
van Dieën, Jaap H.
Pijnappels, Mirjam
Do Older Adults Select Appropriate Motor Strategies in a Stepping-Down Paradigm?
title Do Older Adults Select Appropriate Motor Strategies in a Stepping-Down Paradigm?
title_full Do Older Adults Select Appropriate Motor Strategies in a Stepping-Down Paradigm?
title_fullStr Do Older Adults Select Appropriate Motor Strategies in a Stepping-Down Paradigm?
title_full_unstemmed Do Older Adults Select Appropriate Motor Strategies in a Stepping-Down Paradigm?
title_short Do Older Adults Select Appropriate Motor Strategies in a Stepping-Down Paradigm?
title_sort do older adults select appropriate motor strategies in a stepping-down paradigm?
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6194179/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30369885
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.01419
work_keys_str_mv AT kluftnick doolderadultsselectappropriatemotorstrategiesinasteppingdownparadigm
AT bruijnsjoerdm doolderadultsselectappropriatemotorstrategiesinasteppingdownparadigm
AT vandieenjaaph doolderadultsselectappropriatemotorstrategiesinasteppingdownparadigm
AT pijnappelsmirjam doolderadultsselectappropriatemotorstrategiesinasteppingdownparadigm