Cargando…

Female ornamentation and the fecundity trade‐off in a sex‐role reversed pipefish

Sexual ornaments found only in females are a rare occurrence in nature. One explanation for this is that female ornaments are costly to produce and maintain and, therefore, females must trade‐off resources related to reproduction to promote ornament expression. Here, we investigate whether a trade‐o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mobley, Kenyon B., Morrongiello, John R., Warr, Matthew, Bray, Dianne J., Wong, Bob B. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6194251/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30377519
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4459
_version_ 1783364201402597376
author Mobley, Kenyon B.
Morrongiello, John R.
Warr, Matthew
Bray, Dianne J.
Wong, Bob B. M.
author_facet Mobley, Kenyon B.
Morrongiello, John R.
Warr, Matthew
Bray, Dianne J.
Wong, Bob B. M.
author_sort Mobley, Kenyon B.
collection PubMed
description Sexual ornaments found only in females are a rare occurrence in nature. One explanation for this is that female ornaments are costly to produce and maintain and, therefore, females must trade‐off resources related to reproduction to promote ornament expression. Here, we investigate whether a trade‐off exists between female ornamentation and fecundity in the sex‐role reversed, wide‐bodied pipefish, Stigmatopora nigra. We measured two components of the disk‐shaped, ventral‐striped female ornament, body width, and stripe thickness. After controlling for the influence of body size, we found no evidence of a cost of belly width or stripe thickness on female fecundity. Rather, females that have larger ornaments have higher fecundity and thus accurately advertise their reproductive value to males without incurring a cost to fecundity. We also investigated the relationship between female body size and egg size and found that larger females suffer a slight decrease in egg size and fecundity, although this decrease was independent of female ornamentation. More broadly, considered in light of similar findings in other taxa, lack of an apparent fecundity cost of ornamentation in female pipefish underscores the need to revisit theoretical assumptions concerning the evolution of female ornamentation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6194251
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61942512018-10-30 Female ornamentation and the fecundity trade‐off in a sex‐role reversed pipefish Mobley, Kenyon B. Morrongiello, John R. Warr, Matthew Bray, Dianne J. Wong, Bob B. M. Ecol Evol Original Research Sexual ornaments found only in females are a rare occurrence in nature. One explanation for this is that female ornaments are costly to produce and maintain and, therefore, females must trade‐off resources related to reproduction to promote ornament expression. Here, we investigate whether a trade‐off exists between female ornamentation and fecundity in the sex‐role reversed, wide‐bodied pipefish, Stigmatopora nigra. We measured two components of the disk‐shaped, ventral‐striped female ornament, body width, and stripe thickness. After controlling for the influence of body size, we found no evidence of a cost of belly width or stripe thickness on female fecundity. Rather, females that have larger ornaments have higher fecundity and thus accurately advertise their reproductive value to males without incurring a cost to fecundity. We also investigated the relationship between female body size and egg size and found that larger females suffer a slight decrease in egg size and fecundity, although this decrease was independent of female ornamentation. More broadly, considered in light of similar findings in other taxa, lack of an apparent fecundity cost of ornamentation in female pipefish underscores the need to revisit theoretical assumptions concerning the evolution of female ornamentation. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6194251/ /pubmed/30377519 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4459 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Mobley, Kenyon B.
Morrongiello, John R.
Warr, Matthew
Bray, Dianne J.
Wong, Bob B. M.
Female ornamentation and the fecundity trade‐off in a sex‐role reversed pipefish
title Female ornamentation and the fecundity trade‐off in a sex‐role reversed pipefish
title_full Female ornamentation and the fecundity trade‐off in a sex‐role reversed pipefish
title_fullStr Female ornamentation and the fecundity trade‐off in a sex‐role reversed pipefish
title_full_unstemmed Female ornamentation and the fecundity trade‐off in a sex‐role reversed pipefish
title_short Female ornamentation and the fecundity trade‐off in a sex‐role reversed pipefish
title_sort female ornamentation and the fecundity trade‐off in a sex‐role reversed pipefish
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6194251/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30377519
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4459
work_keys_str_mv AT mobleykenyonb femaleornamentationandthefecunditytradeoffinasexrolereversedpipefish
AT morrongiellojohnr femaleornamentationandthefecunditytradeoffinasexrolereversedpipefish
AT warrmatthew femaleornamentationandthefecunditytradeoffinasexrolereversedpipefish
AT braydiannej femaleornamentationandthefecunditytradeoffinasexrolereversedpipefish
AT wongbobbm femaleornamentationandthefecunditytradeoffinasexrolereversedpipefish