Cargando…

Sperm cryopreservation: Clinical and fertility outcomes in male oncological patients with germ cell tumors or hematological disorders

PURPOSE: There is insufficient understanding of the effects of malignant diseases themselves and chemotherapy on semen quality and final fertility outcomes. Here, the authors focused on the patients with malignant diseases who cryopreserved sperm pre‐ or post‐chemotherapy for future fertility, and r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Negoro, Hiromitsu, Matsui, Yoshiyuki, Nakayama, Takahiro, Hatayama, Hiroshi, Ogawa, Osamu, Ichioka, Kentaro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6194308/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30377406
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12246
_version_ 1783364211657670656
author Negoro, Hiromitsu
Matsui, Yoshiyuki
Nakayama, Takahiro
Hatayama, Hiroshi
Ogawa, Osamu
Ichioka, Kentaro
author_facet Negoro, Hiromitsu
Matsui, Yoshiyuki
Nakayama, Takahiro
Hatayama, Hiroshi
Ogawa, Osamu
Ichioka, Kentaro
author_sort Negoro, Hiromitsu
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: There is insufficient understanding of the effects of malignant diseases themselves and chemotherapy on semen quality and final fertility outcomes. Here, the authors focused on the patients with malignant diseases who cryopreserved sperm pre‐ or post‐chemotherapy for future fertility, and revealed how clinical settings can affect semen quality and final outcomes. METHODS: The authors reviewed the records of 257 patients with malignant diseases who cryopreserved sperm. Among 257 cases, 113 men with germ cell tumors (GCTs) and 111 men with hematological disorders (HDs) were included in this study. Twenty‐five patients who achieved successful outcomes using cryopreserved sperm were also analyzed. RESULTS: In the men with GCTs and HDs, respectively, differences were observed in age (28 vs 27 years), sperm concentration (32.6 vs 46.1 million/mL, P < 0.05), motility (42.2% vs 41.0%), and the rate of cryopreservation before chemotherapy (90% vs 59%, P < 0.0001). For successful pregnancies and deliveries, age at cryopreservation (30.0 vs 35.3 years, P < 0.05) and disease type (12/16 vs 3/9, P < 0.05) were significant factors. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to patients with GCTs, those with HDs have a lower pregnancy and delivery rate, even though semen quality is higher. Disease type and age at cryopreservation are significant factors for successful outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6194308
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61943082018-10-30 Sperm cryopreservation: Clinical and fertility outcomes in male oncological patients with germ cell tumors or hematological disorders Negoro, Hiromitsu Matsui, Yoshiyuki Nakayama, Takahiro Hatayama, Hiroshi Ogawa, Osamu Ichioka, Kentaro Reprod Med Biol Original Articles PURPOSE: There is insufficient understanding of the effects of malignant diseases themselves and chemotherapy on semen quality and final fertility outcomes. Here, the authors focused on the patients with malignant diseases who cryopreserved sperm pre‐ or post‐chemotherapy for future fertility, and revealed how clinical settings can affect semen quality and final outcomes. METHODS: The authors reviewed the records of 257 patients with malignant diseases who cryopreserved sperm. Among 257 cases, 113 men with germ cell tumors (GCTs) and 111 men with hematological disorders (HDs) were included in this study. Twenty‐five patients who achieved successful outcomes using cryopreserved sperm were also analyzed. RESULTS: In the men with GCTs and HDs, respectively, differences were observed in age (28 vs 27 years), sperm concentration (32.6 vs 46.1 million/mL, P < 0.05), motility (42.2% vs 41.0%), and the rate of cryopreservation before chemotherapy (90% vs 59%, P < 0.0001). For successful pregnancies and deliveries, age at cryopreservation (30.0 vs 35.3 years, P < 0.05) and disease type (12/16 vs 3/9, P < 0.05) were significant factors. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to patients with GCTs, those with HDs have a lower pregnancy and delivery rate, even though semen quality is higher. Disease type and age at cryopreservation are significant factors for successful outcomes. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6194308/ /pubmed/30377406 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12246 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Reproductive Medicine and Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japan Society for Reproductive Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Negoro, Hiromitsu
Matsui, Yoshiyuki
Nakayama, Takahiro
Hatayama, Hiroshi
Ogawa, Osamu
Ichioka, Kentaro
Sperm cryopreservation: Clinical and fertility outcomes in male oncological patients with germ cell tumors or hematological disorders
title Sperm cryopreservation: Clinical and fertility outcomes in male oncological patients with germ cell tumors or hematological disorders
title_full Sperm cryopreservation: Clinical and fertility outcomes in male oncological patients with germ cell tumors or hematological disorders
title_fullStr Sperm cryopreservation: Clinical and fertility outcomes in male oncological patients with germ cell tumors or hematological disorders
title_full_unstemmed Sperm cryopreservation: Clinical and fertility outcomes in male oncological patients with germ cell tumors or hematological disorders
title_short Sperm cryopreservation: Clinical and fertility outcomes in male oncological patients with germ cell tumors or hematological disorders
title_sort sperm cryopreservation: clinical and fertility outcomes in male oncological patients with germ cell tumors or hematological disorders
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6194308/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30377406
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12246
work_keys_str_mv AT negorohiromitsu spermcryopreservationclinicalandfertilityoutcomesinmaleoncologicalpatientswithgermcelltumorsorhematologicaldisorders
AT matsuiyoshiyuki spermcryopreservationclinicalandfertilityoutcomesinmaleoncologicalpatientswithgermcelltumorsorhematologicaldisorders
AT nakayamatakahiro spermcryopreservationclinicalandfertilityoutcomesinmaleoncologicalpatientswithgermcelltumorsorhematologicaldisorders
AT hatayamahiroshi spermcryopreservationclinicalandfertilityoutcomesinmaleoncologicalpatientswithgermcelltumorsorhematologicaldisorders
AT ogawaosamu spermcryopreservationclinicalandfertilityoutcomesinmaleoncologicalpatientswithgermcelltumorsorhematologicaldisorders
AT ichiokakentaro spermcryopreservationclinicalandfertilityoutcomesinmaleoncologicalpatientswithgermcelltumorsorhematologicaldisorders