Cargando…
Sperm cryopreservation: Clinical and fertility outcomes in male oncological patients with germ cell tumors or hematological disorders
PURPOSE: There is insufficient understanding of the effects of malignant diseases themselves and chemotherapy on semen quality and final fertility outcomes. Here, the authors focused on the patients with malignant diseases who cryopreserved sperm pre‐ or post‐chemotherapy for future fertility, and r...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6194308/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30377406 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12246 |
_version_ | 1783364211657670656 |
---|---|
author | Negoro, Hiromitsu Matsui, Yoshiyuki Nakayama, Takahiro Hatayama, Hiroshi Ogawa, Osamu Ichioka, Kentaro |
author_facet | Negoro, Hiromitsu Matsui, Yoshiyuki Nakayama, Takahiro Hatayama, Hiroshi Ogawa, Osamu Ichioka, Kentaro |
author_sort | Negoro, Hiromitsu |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: There is insufficient understanding of the effects of malignant diseases themselves and chemotherapy on semen quality and final fertility outcomes. Here, the authors focused on the patients with malignant diseases who cryopreserved sperm pre‐ or post‐chemotherapy for future fertility, and revealed how clinical settings can affect semen quality and final outcomes. METHODS: The authors reviewed the records of 257 patients with malignant diseases who cryopreserved sperm. Among 257 cases, 113 men with germ cell tumors (GCTs) and 111 men with hematological disorders (HDs) were included in this study. Twenty‐five patients who achieved successful outcomes using cryopreserved sperm were also analyzed. RESULTS: In the men with GCTs and HDs, respectively, differences were observed in age (28 vs 27 years), sperm concentration (32.6 vs 46.1 million/mL, P < 0.05), motility (42.2% vs 41.0%), and the rate of cryopreservation before chemotherapy (90% vs 59%, P < 0.0001). For successful pregnancies and deliveries, age at cryopreservation (30.0 vs 35.3 years, P < 0.05) and disease type (12/16 vs 3/9, P < 0.05) were significant factors. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to patients with GCTs, those with HDs have a lower pregnancy and delivery rate, even though semen quality is higher. Disease type and age at cryopreservation are significant factors for successful outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6194308 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61943082018-10-30 Sperm cryopreservation: Clinical and fertility outcomes in male oncological patients with germ cell tumors or hematological disorders Negoro, Hiromitsu Matsui, Yoshiyuki Nakayama, Takahiro Hatayama, Hiroshi Ogawa, Osamu Ichioka, Kentaro Reprod Med Biol Original Articles PURPOSE: There is insufficient understanding of the effects of malignant diseases themselves and chemotherapy on semen quality and final fertility outcomes. Here, the authors focused on the patients with malignant diseases who cryopreserved sperm pre‐ or post‐chemotherapy for future fertility, and revealed how clinical settings can affect semen quality and final outcomes. METHODS: The authors reviewed the records of 257 patients with malignant diseases who cryopreserved sperm. Among 257 cases, 113 men with germ cell tumors (GCTs) and 111 men with hematological disorders (HDs) were included in this study. Twenty‐five patients who achieved successful outcomes using cryopreserved sperm were also analyzed. RESULTS: In the men with GCTs and HDs, respectively, differences were observed in age (28 vs 27 years), sperm concentration (32.6 vs 46.1 million/mL, P < 0.05), motility (42.2% vs 41.0%), and the rate of cryopreservation before chemotherapy (90% vs 59%, P < 0.0001). For successful pregnancies and deliveries, age at cryopreservation (30.0 vs 35.3 years, P < 0.05) and disease type (12/16 vs 3/9, P < 0.05) were significant factors. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to patients with GCTs, those with HDs have a lower pregnancy and delivery rate, even though semen quality is higher. Disease type and age at cryopreservation are significant factors for successful outcomes. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6194308/ /pubmed/30377406 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12246 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Reproductive Medicine and Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japan Society for Reproductive Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Negoro, Hiromitsu Matsui, Yoshiyuki Nakayama, Takahiro Hatayama, Hiroshi Ogawa, Osamu Ichioka, Kentaro Sperm cryopreservation: Clinical and fertility outcomes in male oncological patients with germ cell tumors or hematological disorders |
title | Sperm cryopreservation: Clinical and fertility outcomes in male oncological patients with germ cell tumors or hematological disorders |
title_full | Sperm cryopreservation: Clinical and fertility outcomes in male oncological patients with germ cell tumors or hematological disorders |
title_fullStr | Sperm cryopreservation: Clinical and fertility outcomes in male oncological patients with germ cell tumors or hematological disorders |
title_full_unstemmed | Sperm cryopreservation: Clinical and fertility outcomes in male oncological patients with germ cell tumors or hematological disorders |
title_short | Sperm cryopreservation: Clinical and fertility outcomes in male oncological patients with germ cell tumors or hematological disorders |
title_sort | sperm cryopreservation: clinical and fertility outcomes in male oncological patients with germ cell tumors or hematological disorders |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6194308/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30377406 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12246 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT negorohiromitsu spermcryopreservationclinicalandfertilityoutcomesinmaleoncologicalpatientswithgermcelltumorsorhematologicaldisorders AT matsuiyoshiyuki spermcryopreservationclinicalandfertilityoutcomesinmaleoncologicalpatientswithgermcelltumorsorhematologicaldisorders AT nakayamatakahiro spermcryopreservationclinicalandfertilityoutcomesinmaleoncologicalpatientswithgermcelltumorsorhematologicaldisorders AT hatayamahiroshi spermcryopreservationclinicalandfertilityoutcomesinmaleoncologicalpatientswithgermcelltumorsorhematologicaldisorders AT ogawaosamu spermcryopreservationclinicalandfertilityoutcomesinmaleoncologicalpatientswithgermcelltumorsorhematologicaldisorders AT ichiokakentaro spermcryopreservationclinicalandfertilityoutcomesinmaleoncologicalpatientswithgermcelltumorsorhematologicaldisorders |