Cargando…

Proficiency-based progression training: an ‘end to end’ model for decreasing error applied to achievement of effective epidural analgesia during labour: a randomised control study

BACKGROUND: Training procedural skills using proficiency-based progression (PBP) methodology has consistently resulted in error reduction. We hypothesised that implementation of metric-based PBP training and a valid assessment tool would decrease the failure rate of epidural analgesia during labour...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kallidaikurichi Srinivasan, Karthikeyan, Gallagher, Anthony, O’Brien, Niall, Sudir, Vinod, Barrett, Nick, O’Connor, Raymund, Holt, Francesca, Lee, Peter, O’Donnell, Brian, Shorten, George
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6194403/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30327396
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020099
_version_ 1783364223408013312
author Kallidaikurichi Srinivasan, Karthikeyan
Gallagher, Anthony
O’Brien, Niall
Sudir, Vinod
Barrett, Nick
O’Connor, Raymund
Holt, Francesca
Lee, Peter
O’Donnell, Brian
Shorten, George
author_facet Kallidaikurichi Srinivasan, Karthikeyan
Gallagher, Anthony
O’Brien, Niall
Sudir, Vinod
Barrett, Nick
O’Connor, Raymund
Holt, Francesca
Lee, Peter
O’Donnell, Brian
Shorten, George
author_sort Kallidaikurichi Srinivasan, Karthikeyan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Training procedural skills using proficiency-based progression (PBP) methodology has consistently resulted in error reduction. We hypothesised that implementation of metric-based PBP training and a valid assessment tool would decrease the failure rate of epidural analgesia during labour when compared to standard simulation-based training. METHODS: Detailed, procedure-specific metrics for labour epidural catheter placement were developed based on carefully elicited expert input. Proficiency was defined using criteria derived from clinical performance of experienced practitioners. A PBP curriculum was developed to train medical personnel on these specific metrics and to eliminate errors in a simulation environment. Seventeen novice anaesthetic trainees were randomly allocated to undergo PBP training (Group P) or simulation only training (Group S). Following training, data from the first 10 labour epidurals performed by each participant were recorded. The primary outcome measure was epidural failure rate. RESULTS: A total of 74 metrics were developed and validated. The inter-rater reliability (IRR) of the derived assessment tool was 0.88. Of 17 trainees recruited, eight were randomly allocated to group S and six to group P (three trainees did not complete the study). Data from 140 clinical procedures were collected. The incidence of epidural failure was reduced by 54% with PBP training (28.7% in Group S vs 13.3% in Group P, absolute risk reduction 15.4% with 95% CI 2% to 28.8%, p=0.04). CONCLUSION: Procedure-specific metrics developed for labour epidural catheter placement discriminated the performance of experts and novices with an IRR of 0.88. Proficiency-based progression training resulted in a lower incidence of epidural failure compared to simulation only training. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02179879. NCT02185079; Post-results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6194403
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61944032018-10-24 Proficiency-based progression training: an ‘end to end’ model for decreasing error applied to achievement of effective epidural analgesia during labour: a randomised control study Kallidaikurichi Srinivasan, Karthikeyan Gallagher, Anthony O’Brien, Niall Sudir, Vinod Barrett, Nick O’Connor, Raymund Holt, Francesca Lee, Peter O’Donnell, Brian Shorten, George BMJ Open Anaesthesia BACKGROUND: Training procedural skills using proficiency-based progression (PBP) methodology has consistently resulted in error reduction. We hypothesised that implementation of metric-based PBP training and a valid assessment tool would decrease the failure rate of epidural analgesia during labour when compared to standard simulation-based training. METHODS: Detailed, procedure-specific metrics for labour epidural catheter placement were developed based on carefully elicited expert input. Proficiency was defined using criteria derived from clinical performance of experienced practitioners. A PBP curriculum was developed to train medical personnel on these specific metrics and to eliminate errors in a simulation environment. Seventeen novice anaesthetic trainees were randomly allocated to undergo PBP training (Group P) or simulation only training (Group S). Following training, data from the first 10 labour epidurals performed by each participant were recorded. The primary outcome measure was epidural failure rate. RESULTS: A total of 74 metrics were developed and validated. The inter-rater reliability (IRR) of the derived assessment tool was 0.88. Of 17 trainees recruited, eight were randomly allocated to group S and six to group P (three trainees did not complete the study). Data from 140 clinical procedures were collected. The incidence of epidural failure was reduced by 54% with PBP training (28.7% in Group S vs 13.3% in Group P, absolute risk reduction 15.4% with 95% CI 2% to 28.8%, p=0.04). CONCLUSION: Procedure-specific metrics developed for labour epidural catheter placement discriminated the performance of experts and novices with an IRR of 0.88. Proficiency-based progression training resulted in a lower incidence of epidural failure compared to simulation only training. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02179879. NCT02185079; Post-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6194403/ /pubmed/30327396 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020099 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Anaesthesia
Kallidaikurichi Srinivasan, Karthikeyan
Gallagher, Anthony
O’Brien, Niall
Sudir, Vinod
Barrett, Nick
O’Connor, Raymund
Holt, Francesca
Lee, Peter
O’Donnell, Brian
Shorten, George
Proficiency-based progression training: an ‘end to end’ model for decreasing error applied to achievement of effective epidural analgesia during labour: a randomised control study
title Proficiency-based progression training: an ‘end to end’ model for decreasing error applied to achievement of effective epidural analgesia during labour: a randomised control study
title_full Proficiency-based progression training: an ‘end to end’ model for decreasing error applied to achievement of effective epidural analgesia during labour: a randomised control study
title_fullStr Proficiency-based progression training: an ‘end to end’ model for decreasing error applied to achievement of effective epidural analgesia during labour: a randomised control study
title_full_unstemmed Proficiency-based progression training: an ‘end to end’ model for decreasing error applied to achievement of effective epidural analgesia during labour: a randomised control study
title_short Proficiency-based progression training: an ‘end to end’ model for decreasing error applied to achievement of effective epidural analgesia during labour: a randomised control study
title_sort proficiency-based progression training: an ‘end to end’ model for decreasing error applied to achievement of effective epidural analgesia during labour: a randomised control study
topic Anaesthesia
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6194403/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30327396
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020099
work_keys_str_mv AT kallidaikurichisrinivasankarthikeyan proficiencybasedprogressiontraininganendtoendmodelfordecreasingerrorappliedtoachievementofeffectiveepiduralanalgesiaduringlabourarandomisedcontrolstudy
AT gallagheranthony proficiencybasedprogressiontraininganendtoendmodelfordecreasingerrorappliedtoachievementofeffectiveepiduralanalgesiaduringlabourarandomisedcontrolstudy
AT obrienniall proficiencybasedprogressiontraininganendtoendmodelfordecreasingerrorappliedtoachievementofeffectiveepiduralanalgesiaduringlabourarandomisedcontrolstudy
AT sudirvinod proficiencybasedprogressiontraininganendtoendmodelfordecreasingerrorappliedtoachievementofeffectiveepiduralanalgesiaduringlabourarandomisedcontrolstudy
AT barrettnick proficiencybasedprogressiontraininganendtoendmodelfordecreasingerrorappliedtoachievementofeffectiveepiduralanalgesiaduringlabourarandomisedcontrolstudy
AT oconnorraymund proficiencybasedprogressiontraininganendtoendmodelfordecreasingerrorappliedtoachievementofeffectiveepiduralanalgesiaduringlabourarandomisedcontrolstudy
AT holtfrancesca proficiencybasedprogressiontraininganendtoendmodelfordecreasingerrorappliedtoachievementofeffectiveepiduralanalgesiaduringlabourarandomisedcontrolstudy
AT leepeter proficiencybasedprogressiontraininganendtoendmodelfordecreasingerrorappliedtoachievementofeffectiveepiduralanalgesiaduringlabourarandomisedcontrolstudy
AT odonnellbrian proficiencybasedprogressiontraininganendtoendmodelfordecreasingerrorappliedtoachievementofeffectiveepiduralanalgesiaduringlabourarandomisedcontrolstudy
AT shortengeorge proficiencybasedprogressiontraininganendtoendmodelfordecreasingerrorappliedtoachievementofeffectiveepiduralanalgesiaduringlabourarandomisedcontrolstudy