Cargando…

A protocol for the process evaluation of a multi-centre randomised trial to compare the effectiveness of geriatrician-led admission avoidance hospital at home versus inpatient admission

BACKGROUND: Attempts to design services to support the delivery of healthcare closer to home have taken various forms as countries respond to an increase in hospital admission rates for older people, who are at risk of hospital-acquired morbidity, prolonged lengths of stay and readmission. Evidence...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mäkelä, Petra, Godfrey, Mary, Cradduck-Bamford, Andrea, Ellis, Graham, Shepperd, Sasha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6194629/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30340618
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2929-4
_version_ 1783364264029847552
author Mäkelä, Petra
Godfrey, Mary
Cradduck-Bamford, Andrea
Ellis, Graham
Shepperd, Sasha
author_facet Mäkelä, Petra
Godfrey, Mary
Cradduck-Bamford, Andrea
Ellis, Graham
Shepperd, Sasha
author_sort Mäkelä, Petra
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Attempts to design services to support the delivery of healthcare closer to home have taken various forms as countries respond to an increase in hospital admission rates for older people, who are at risk of hospital-acquired morbidity, prolonged lengths of stay and readmission. Evidence to support the development of these services is limited. We are conducting a process evaluation, alongside a UK multi-site randomised trial, to understand the contexts and practices of implementing geriatrician-led admission avoidance hospital at home services and to explore ways that the intervention might be effective, under what conditions, for whom, and how it differs from inpatient care. METHODS: We are interviewing patients and their caregivers, from sites that are purposively sampled from participating National Health Service (NHS) trusts across the UK. We are also visiting sites to observe local processes and discuss the establishment and running of services with a range of multidisciplinary staff, managers, commissioners, primary care and social services representatives. We aim to interview approximately 36 patients and their caregivers with experience of hospital at home or inpatient services; 12 at each of three sites. We will use a content analysis approach to explore data across participants, services and sites. DISCUSSION: This process evaluation will enable evaluation of implementation processes prior to knowing trial outcomes. We encompass domains of reach, delivery, change, context and response to the intervention by patients, their carers, health professionals and the health system. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN60477865. Registered on 10 March 2014. Trial sponsor: University of Oxford. Version 3.1, registered on 14 June 2016.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6194629
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61946292018-10-25 A protocol for the process evaluation of a multi-centre randomised trial to compare the effectiveness of geriatrician-led admission avoidance hospital at home versus inpatient admission Mäkelä, Petra Godfrey, Mary Cradduck-Bamford, Andrea Ellis, Graham Shepperd, Sasha Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Attempts to design services to support the delivery of healthcare closer to home have taken various forms as countries respond to an increase in hospital admission rates for older people, who are at risk of hospital-acquired morbidity, prolonged lengths of stay and readmission. Evidence to support the development of these services is limited. We are conducting a process evaluation, alongside a UK multi-site randomised trial, to understand the contexts and practices of implementing geriatrician-led admission avoidance hospital at home services and to explore ways that the intervention might be effective, under what conditions, for whom, and how it differs from inpatient care. METHODS: We are interviewing patients and their caregivers, from sites that are purposively sampled from participating National Health Service (NHS) trusts across the UK. We are also visiting sites to observe local processes and discuss the establishment and running of services with a range of multidisciplinary staff, managers, commissioners, primary care and social services representatives. We aim to interview approximately 36 patients and their caregivers with experience of hospital at home or inpatient services; 12 at each of three sites. We will use a content analysis approach to explore data across participants, services and sites. DISCUSSION: This process evaluation will enable evaluation of implementation processes prior to knowing trial outcomes. We encompass domains of reach, delivery, change, context and response to the intervention by patients, their carers, health professionals and the health system. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN60477865. Registered on 10 March 2014. Trial sponsor: University of Oxford. Version 3.1, registered on 14 June 2016. BioMed Central 2018-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6194629/ /pubmed/30340618 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2929-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Mäkelä, Petra
Godfrey, Mary
Cradduck-Bamford, Andrea
Ellis, Graham
Shepperd, Sasha
A protocol for the process evaluation of a multi-centre randomised trial to compare the effectiveness of geriatrician-led admission avoidance hospital at home versus inpatient admission
title A protocol for the process evaluation of a multi-centre randomised trial to compare the effectiveness of geriatrician-led admission avoidance hospital at home versus inpatient admission
title_full A protocol for the process evaluation of a multi-centre randomised trial to compare the effectiveness of geriatrician-led admission avoidance hospital at home versus inpatient admission
title_fullStr A protocol for the process evaluation of a multi-centre randomised trial to compare the effectiveness of geriatrician-led admission avoidance hospital at home versus inpatient admission
title_full_unstemmed A protocol for the process evaluation of a multi-centre randomised trial to compare the effectiveness of geriatrician-led admission avoidance hospital at home versus inpatient admission
title_short A protocol for the process evaluation of a multi-centre randomised trial to compare the effectiveness of geriatrician-led admission avoidance hospital at home versus inpatient admission
title_sort protocol for the process evaluation of a multi-centre randomised trial to compare the effectiveness of geriatrician-led admission avoidance hospital at home versus inpatient admission
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6194629/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30340618
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2929-4
work_keys_str_mv AT makelapetra aprotocolfortheprocessevaluationofamulticentrerandomisedtrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofgeriatricianledadmissionavoidancehospitalathomeversusinpatientadmission
AT godfreymary aprotocolfortheprocessevaluationofamulticentrerandomisedtrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofgeriatricianledadmissionavoidancehospitalathomeversusinpatientadmission
AT cradduckbamfordandrea aprotocolfortheprocessevaluationofamulticentrerandomisedtrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofgeriatricianledadmissionavoidancehospitalathomeversusinpatientadmission
AT ellisgraham aprotocolfortheprocessevaluationofamulticentrerandomisedtrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofgeriatricianledadmissionavoidancehospitalathomeversusinpatientadmission
AT shepperdsasha aprotocolfortheprocessevaluationofamulticentrerandomisedtrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofgeriatricianledadmissionavoidancehospitalathomeversusinpatientadmission
AT makelapetra protocolfortheprocessevaluationofamulticentrerandomisedtrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofgeriatricianledadmissionavoidancehospitalathomeversusinpatientadmission
AT godfreymary protocolfortheprocessevaluationofamulticentrerandomisedtrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofgeriatricianledadmissionavoidancehospitalathomeversusinpatientadmission
AT cradduckbamfordandrea protocolfortheprocessevaluationofamulticentrerandomisedtrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofgeriatricianledadmissionavoidancehospitalathomeversusinpatientadmission
AT ellisgraham protocolfortheprocessevaluationofamulticentrerandomisedtrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofgeriatricianledadmissionavoidancehospitalathomeversusinpatientadmission
AT shepperdsasha protocolfortheprocessevaluationofamulticentrerandomisedtrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofgeriatricianledadmissionavoidancehospitalathomeversusinpatientadmission