Cargando…
The World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist: An audit of quality of implementation at a tertiary care high volume cancer institution
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In 2007, the World Health Organization (WHO) implemented the Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC), which has enhanced the communication between the surgical team members, improved outcomes, decreased complications, and improved patient safety. However, for the checklist to be effecti...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6194824/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30386026 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joacp.JOACP_328_17 |
_version_ | 1783364304975691776 |
---|---|
author | Ambulkar, Reshma Ranganathan, Priya Salunke, Kirti Savarkar, Sukhada |
author_facet | Ambulkar, Reshma Ranganathan, Priya Salunke, Kirti Savarkar, Sukhada |
author_sort | Ambulkar, Reshma |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In 2007, the World Health Organization (WHO) implemented the Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC), which has enhanced the communication between the surgical team members, improved outcomes, decreased complications, and improved patient safety. However, for the checklist to be effective, proper implementation and compliance with the checklist are imperative. The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of implementation of the WHO SSC during elective surgery at a tertiary referral cancer hospital in India. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this prospective observational study, a trained research nurse passively observed the implementation of selected items from the modified version of the WHO SSC during elective surgeries and evaluated the compliance with the checklist, percentage of items for which the use of the SSC prompted an action, and level of interaction between the key team players during the conduct of the checklist. RESULTS: We studied 200 surgeries for each part of the SSC. Compliance was 200 (100%), 156 (78%), and 153 (76.5%) for the first, second, and third part of the SSC, respectively. All the three parts were mostly initiated by surgeons [197 (98.5%), 92 (59%), and 136 (88.9%), respectively]. Overall, 131/2200 (5.95%) items in the checklist were carried out only after being prompted during the conduct of the checklist. The interaction between all three representatives was found in only 265/509 (52%) cases. CONCLUSION: The quality of implementation of the SSC was found to be suboptimal, with a definite scope for improvement. Compliance with all items on the checklist and active participation by all team members are crucial for successful implementation of the checklist. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6194824 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61948242018-10-31 The World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist: An audit of quality of implementation at a tertiary care high volume cancer institution Ambulkar, Reshma Ranganathan, Priya Salunke, Kirti Savarkar, Sukhada J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol Original Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In 2007, the World Health Organization (WHO) implemented the Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC), which has enhanced the communication between the surgical team members, improved outcomes, decreased complications, and improved patient safety. However, for the checklist to be effective, proper implementation and compliance with the checklist are imperative. The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of implementation of the WHO SSC during elective surgery at a tertiary referral cancer hospital in India. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this prospective observational study, a trained research nurse passively observed the implementation of selected items from the modified version of the WHO SSC during elective surgeries and evaluated the compliance with the checklist, percentage of items for which the use of the SSC prompted an action, and level of interaction between the key team players during the conduct of the checklist. RESULTS: We studied 200 surgeries for each part of the SSC. Compliance was 200 (100%), 156 (78%), and 153 (76.5%) for the first, second, and third part of the SSC, respectively. All the three parts were mostly initiated by surgeons [197 (98.5%), 92 (59%), and 136 (88.9%), respectively]. Overall, 131/2200 (5.95%) items in the checklist were carried out only after being prompted during the conduct of the checklist. The interaction between all three representatives was found in only 265/509 (52%) cases. CONCLUSION: The quality of implementation of the SSC was found to be suboptimal, with a definite scope for improvement. Compliance with all items on the checklist and active participation by all team members are crucial for successful implementation of the checklist. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6194824/ /pubmed/30386026 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joacp.JOACP_328_17 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Ambulkar, Reshma Ranganathan, Priya Salunke, Kirti Savarkar, Sukhada The World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist: An audit of quality of implementation at a tertiary care high volume cancer institution |
title | The World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist: An audit of quality of implementation at a tertiary care high volume cancer institution |
title_full | The World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist: An audit of quality of implementation at a tertiary care high volume cancer institution |
title_fullStr | The World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist: An audit of quality of implementation at a tertiary care high volume cancer institution |
title_full_unstemmed | The World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist: An audit of quality of implementation at a tertiary care high volume cancer institution |
title_short | The World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist: An audit of quality of implementation at a tertiary care high volume cancer institution |
title_sort | world health organization surgical safety checklist: an audit of quality of implementation at a tertiary care high volume cancer institution |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6194824/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30386026 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joacp.JOACP_328_17 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ambulkarreshma theworldhealthorganizationsurgicalsafetychecklistanauditofqualityofimplementationatatertiarycarehighvolumecancerinstitution AT ranganathanpriya theworldhealthorganizationsurgicalsafetychecklistanauditofqualityofimplementationatatertiarycarehighvolumecancerinstitution AT salunkekirti theworldhealthorganizationsurgicalsafetychecklistanauditofqualityofimplementationatatertiarycarehighvolumecancerinstitution AT savarkarsukhada theworldhealthorganizationsurgicalsafetychecklistanauditofqualityofimplementationatatertiarycarehighvolumecancerinstitution AT ambulkarreshma worldhealthorganizationsurgicalsafetychecklistanauditofqualityofimplementationatatertiarycarehighvolumecancerinstitution AT ranganathanpriya worldhealthorganizationsurgicalsafetychecklistanauditofqualityofimplementationatatertiarycarehighvolumecancerinstitution AT salunkekirti worldhealthorganizationsurgicalsafetychecklistanauditofqualityofimplementationatatertiarycarehighvolumecancerinstitution AT savarkarsukhada worldhealthorganizationsurgicalsafetychecklistanauditofqualityofimplementationatatertiarycarehighvolumecancerinstitution |