Cargando…

Ceftriaxone concentration at the surgical site following systemic and isolated upper limb injection

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: This study was conducted to find out the equipotent dose of isolated upper limb injection of ceftriaxone in the upper limb (IUL) surgeries under tourniquet that would attain a peak bone marrow concentration (Cmax) similar to systemic (ST) 1 g injection. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Pat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kundra, Pankaj, Vaithilingam, Balaji, Vinayagam, Stalin, Adithan, Chandrasekaran, Nema, Sandeep
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6194834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30386012
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joacp.JOACP_28_18
_version_ 1783364307372736512
author Kundra, Pankaj
Vaithilingam, Balaji
Vinayagam, Stalin
Adithan, Chandrasekaran
Nema, Sandeep
author_facet Kundra, Pankaj
Vaithilingam, Balaji
Vinayagam, Stalin
Adithan, Chandrasekaran
Nema, Sandeep
author_sort Kundra, Pankaj
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: This study was conducted to find out the equipotent dose of isolated upper limb injection of ceftriaxone in the upper limb (IUL) surgeries under tourniquet that would attain a peak bone marrow concentration (Cmax) similar to systemic (ST) 1 g injection. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients were allocated into two groups – ST and IUL. ST group (n = 5) received 1 g of ceftriaxone 20 min before tourniquet inflation, and IUL group received calculated dose (n = 5 in each dosage, i.e., 200, 100, 75, and 50 mg) diluted in 50 mL of normal saline distally after tourniquet inflation. Venous and bone marrow samples were collected at various time intervals intra- and post-operatively. Ceftriaxone concentration was analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between Cmax following ST 1 g injection and IUL injection with 75 mg (155.8 ± 2.1 vs 158.5 ± 3.1 μg/mL, respectively; P = 0.1). There was significant difference in area under curve (AUC) and t½ between ST 1 g injection and IUL injection with 75 mg of ceftriaxone (AUC 1285 ± 67 vs 784.4 ± 28 μg/mL/h, respectively; P < 0.001), (t½ 5.2 ± 0.5 vs 4.7 ± 0.3 h, respectively; P < 0.001). None of the patients in the ST and IUL groups had post-operative infection up to a period of 1 week duration. CONCLUSION: IUL injection with 75 mg of ceftriaxone can be equipotent and as effective as ST 1 g injection in upper limb orthopedic surgeries under tourniquet.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6194834
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61948342018-10-31 Ceftriaxone concentration at the surgical site following systemic and isolated upper limb injection Kundra, Pankaj Vaithilingam, Balaji Vinayagam, Stalin Adithan, Chandrasekaran Nema, Sandeep J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol Original Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: This study was conducted to find out the equipotent dose of isolated upper limb injection of ceftriaxone in the upper limb (IUL) surgeries under tourniquet that would attain a peak bone marrow concentration (Cmax) similar to systemic (ST) 1 g injection. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients were allocated into two groups – ST and IUL. ST group (n = 5) received 1 g of ceftriaxone 20 min before tourniquet inflation, and IUL group received calculated dose (n = 5 in each dosage, i.e., 200, 100, 75, and 50 mg) diluted in 50 mL of normal saline distally after tourniquet inflation. Venous and bone marrow samples were collected at various time intervals intra- and post-operatively. Ceftriaxone concentration was analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between Cmax following ST 1 g injection and IUL injection with 75 mg (155.8 ± 2.1 vs 158.5 ± 3.1 μg/mL, respectively; P = 0.1). There was significant difference in area under curve (AUC) and t½ between ST 1 g injection and IUL injection with 75 mg of ceftriaxone (AUC 1285 ± 67 vs 784.4 ± 28 μg/mL/h, respectively; P < 0.001), (t½ 5.2 ± 0.5 vs 4.7 ± 0.3 h, respectively; P < 0.001). None of the patients in the ST and IUL groups had post-operative infection up to a period of 1 week duration. CONCLUSION: IUL injection with 75 mg of ceftriaxone can be equipotent and as effective as ST 1 g injection in upper limb orthopedic surgeries under tourniquet. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6194834/ /pubmed/30386012 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joacp.JOACP_28_18 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kundra, Pankaj
Vaithilingam, Balaji
Vinayagam, Stalin
Adithan, Chandrasekaran
Nema, Sandeep
Ceftriaxone concentration at the surgical site following systemic and isolated upper limb injection
title Ceftriaxone concentration at the surgical site following systemic and isolated upper limb injection
title_full Ceftriaxone concentration at the surgical site following systemic and isolated upper limb injection
title_fullStr Ceftriaxone concentration at the surgical site following systemic and isolated upper limb injection
title_full_unstemmed Ceftriaxone concentration at the surgical site following systemic and isolated upper limb injection
title_short Ceftriaxone concentration at the surgical site following systemic and isolated upper limb injection
title_sort ceftriaxone concentration at the surgical site following systemic and isolated upper limb injection
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6194834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30386012
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joacp.JOACP_28_18
work_keys_str_mv AT kundrapankaj ceftriaxoneconcentrationatthesurgicalsitefollowingsystemicandisolatedupperlimbinjection
AT vaithilingambalaji ceftriaxoneconcentrationatthesurgicalsitefollowingsystemicandisolatedupperlimbinjection
AT vinayagamstalin ceftriaxoneconcentrationatthesurgicalsitefollowingsystemicandisolatedupperlimbinjection
AT adithanchandrasekaran ceftriaxoneconcentrationatthesurgicalsitefollowingsystemicandisolatedupperlimbinjection
AT nemasandeep ceftriaxoneconcentrationatthesurgicalsitefollowingsystemicandisolatedupperlimbinjection