Cargando…
Ceftriaxone concentration at the surgical site following systemic and isolated upper limb injection
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: This study was conducted to find out the equipotent dose of isolated upper limb injection of ceftriaxone in the upper limb (IUL) surgeries under tourniquet that would attain a peak bone marrow concentration (Cmax) similar to systemic (ST) 1 g injection. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Pat...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6194834/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30386012 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joacp.JOACP_28_18 |
_version_ | 1783364307372736512 |
---|---|
author | Kundra, Pankaj Vaithilingam, Balaji Vinayagam, Stalin Adithan, Chandrasekaran Nema, Sandeep |
author_facet | Kundra, Pankaj Vaithilingam, Balaji Vinayagam, Stalin Adithan, Chandrasekaran Nema, Sandeep |
author_sort | Kundra, Pankaj |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIMS: This study was conducted to find out the equipotent dose of isolated upper limb injection of ceftriaxone in the upper limb (IUL) surgeries under tourniquet that would attain a peak bone marrow concentration (Cmax) similar to systemic (ST) 1 g injection. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients were allocated into two groups – ST and IUL. ST group (n = 5) received 1 g of ceftriaxone 20 min before tourniquet inflation, and IUL group received calculated dose (n = 5 in each dosage, i.e., 200, 100, 75, and 50 mg) diluted in 50 mL of normal saline distally after tourniquet inflation. Venous and bone marrow samples were collected at various time intervals intra- and post-operatively. Ceftriaxone concentration was analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between Cmax following ST 1 g injection and IUL injection with 75 mg (155.8 ± 2.1 vs 158.5 ± 3.1 μg/mL, respectively; P = 0.1). There was significant difference in area under curve (AUC) and t½ between ST 1 g injection and IUL injection with 75 mg of ceftriaxone (AUC 1285 ± 67 vs 784.4 ± 28 μg/mL/h, respectively; P < 0.001), (t½ 5.2 ± 0.5 vs 4.7 ± 0.3 h, respectively; P < 0.001). None of the patients in the ST and IUL groups had post-operative infection up to a period of 1 week duration. CONCLUSION: IUL injection with 75 mg of ceftriaxone can be equipotent and as effective as ST 1 g injection in upper limb orthopedic surgeries under tourniquet. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6194834 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61948342018-10-31 Ceftriaxone concentration at the surgical site following systemic and isolated upper limb injection Kundra, Pankaj Vaithilingam, Balaji Vinayagam, Stalin Adithan, Chandrasekaran Nema, Sandeep J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol Original Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: This study was conducted to find out the equipotent dose of isolated upper limb injection of ceftriaxone in the upper limb (IUL) surgeries under tourniquet that would attain a peak bone marrow concentration (Cmax) similar to systemic (ST) 1 g injection. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients were allocated into two groups – ST and IUL. ST group (n = 5) received 1 g of ceftriaxone 20 min before tourniquet inflation, and IUL group received calculated dose (n = 5 in each dosage, i.e., 200, 100, 75, and 50 mg) diluted in 50 mL of normal saline distally after tourniquet inflation. Venous and bone marrow samples were collected at various time intervals intra- and post-operatively. Ceftriaxone concentration was analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between Cmax following ST 1 g injection and IUL injection with 75 mg (155.8 ± 2.1 vs 158.5 ± 3.1 μg/mL, respectively; P = 0.1). There was significant difference in area under curve (AUC) and t½ between ST 1 g injection and IUL injection with 75 mg of ceftriaxone (AUC 1285 ± 67 vs 784.4 ± 28 μg/mL/h, respectively; P < 0.001), (t½ 5.2 ± 0.5 vs 4.7 ± 0.3 h, respectively; P < 0.001). None of the patients in the ST and IUL groups had post-operative infection up to a period of 1 week duration. CONCLUSION: IUL injection with 75 mg of ceftriaxone can be equipotent and as effective as ST 1 g injection in upper limb orthopedic surgeries under tourniquet. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6194834/ /pubmed/30386012 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joacp.JOACP_28_18 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kundra, Pankaj Vaithilingam, Balaji Vinayagam, Stalin Adithan, Chandrasekaran Nema, Sandeep Ceftriaxone concentration at the surgical site following systemic and isolated upper limb injection |
title | Ceftriaxone concentration at the surgical site following systemic and isolated upper limb injection |
title_full | Ceftriaxone concentration at the surgical site following systemic and isolated upper limb injection |
title_fullStr | Ceftriaxone concentration at the surgical site following systemic and isolated upper limb injection |
title_full_unstemmed | Ceftriaxone concentration at the surgical site following systemic and isolated upper limb injection |
title_short | Ceftriaxone concentration at the surgical site following systemic and isolated upper limb injection |
title_sort | ceftriaxone concentration at the surgical site following systemic and isolated upper limb injection |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6194834/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30386012 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joacp.JOACP_28_18 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kundrapankaj ceftriaxoneconcentrationatthesurgicalsitefollowingsystemicandisolatedupperlimbinjection AT vaithilingambalaji ceftriaxoneconcentrationatthesurgicalsitefollowingsystemicandisolatedupperlimbinjection AT vinayagamstalin ceftriaxoneconcentrationatthesurgicalsitefollowingsystemicandisolatedupperlimbinjection AT adithanchandrasekaran ceftriaxoneconcentrationatthesurgicalsitefollowingsystemicandisolatedupperlimbinjection AT nemasandeep ceftriaxoneconcentrationatthesurgicalsitefollowingsystemicandisolatedupperlimbinjection |