Cargando…

Accelerated Hypofractionated Radiotherapy Versus Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Stage I Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer—A Single Institution Experience With Long-Term Follow-Up

PURPOSE: Although stereotactic body radiation therapy is one of the standard treatments for stage I nonsmall cell lung cancer, in the case of central tumors it carries the risk of severe adverse events for serial organs. Accelerated hypofractionated radiotherapy is considered a reasonable alternativ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karasawa, Katsuyuki, Hayakawa, Sara, Machitori, Yumiko, Shibata, Yukiko, Ogawa, Hiroaki, Ito, Kei, Shimizuguchi, Takuya, Kawamoto, Terufumi, Nihei, Keiji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6195005/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30317929
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1533033818806318
_version_ 1783364332485083136
author Karasawa, Katsuyuki
Hayakawa, Sara
Machitori, Yumiko
Shibata, Yukiko
Ogawa, Hiroaki
Ito, Kei
Shimizuguchi, Takuya
Kawamoto, Terufumi
Nihei, Keiji
author_facet Karasawa, Katsuyuki
Hayakawa, Sara
Machitori, Yumiko
Shibata, Yukiko
Ogawa, Hiroaki
Ito, Kei
Shimizuguchi, Takuya
Kawamoto, Terufumi
Nihei, Keiji
author_sort Karasawa, Katsuyuki
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Although stereotactic body radiation therapy is one of the standard treatments for stage I nonsmall cell lung cancer, in the case of central tumors it carries the risk of severe adverse events for serial organs. Accelerated hypofractionated radiotherapy is considered a reasonable alternative to treat central tumors. We have been treating central tumors with accelerated hypofractionated radiotherapy using a 75 Gy/25 fr/5 weeks regimen, and we compared the results with those of stereotactic body radiation therapy using 48 Gy/4 fr/1 week. METHODS: Patients with central tumors and/or unfit for 1-hour fixation were candidates for accelerated hypofractionated radiotherapy. Based on the proximity to the biologically effective dose at 10 Gy, above accelerated hypofractionated radiotherapy regimen was adopted. RESULTS: From October 2003 to December 2010, 159 patients, who received either accelerated hypofractionated radiotherapy (103 cases) or stereotactic body radiation therapy (56 cases), were included in the analysis. In the accelerated hypofractionated radiotherapy group, 40 (39%) cases were central tumors, whereas all cases were peripheral tumors in the stereotactic body radiation therapy group. Overall 5-year local control and survival rates were 81.9% (95% confidence interval 73.6%-90.1%) and 46.5% (95% confidence interval 36.7%-56.2%), respectively for the accelerated hypofractionated radiotherapy group, and 75.4% (95% confidence interval 63.0%-87.8%) and 44.6% (95% confidence interval 31.6%-57.7%), respectively for the stereotactic body radiation therapy group (n.s.). Among central tumors, ultracentral tumors (21 cases) and the remaining central tumors (19 cases) were similar in both local control and survival. On multivariate analysis, hazard ratios for accelerated hypofractionated radiotherapy versus stereotactic body radiation therapy were <1 for both local control and survival. Pulmonary toxicity was similar in both groups. No serial organ toxicity was observed for central tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Accelerated hypofractionated radiotherapy with a 75 Gy/25 fr/5 weeks regimen is promising in that it can obtain similar local control and survival results to stereotactic body radiation therapy, and it can control both central and peripheral tumors without any serial organ toxicities. Based on these results, prospective multicenter trials are worth conducting, especially for ultracentral tumors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6195005
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61950052018-10-22 Accelerated Hypofractionated Radiotherapy Versus Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Stage I Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer—A Single Institution Experience With Long-Term Follow-Up Karasawa, Katsuyuki Hayakawa, Sara Machitori, Yumiko Shibata, Yukiko Ogawa, Hiroaki Ito, Kei Shimizuguchi, Takuya Kawamoto, Terufumi Nihei, Keiji Technol Cancer Res Treat Original Article PURPOSE: Although stereotactic body radiation therapy is one of the standard treatments for stage I nonsmall cell lung cancer, in the case of central tumors it carries the risk of severe adverse events for serial organs. Accelerated hypofractionated radiotherapy is considered a reasonable alternative to treat central tumors. We have been treating central tumors with accelerated hypofractionated radiotherapy using a 75 Gy/25 fr/5 weeks regimen, and we compared the results with those of stereotactic body radiation therapy using 48 Gy/4 fr/1 week. METHODS: Patients with central tumors and/or unfit for 1-hour fixation were candidates for accelerated hypofractionated radiotherapy. Based on the proximity to the biologically effective dose at 10 Gy, above accelerated hypofractionated radiotherapy regimen was adopted. RESULTS: From October 2003 to December 2010, 159 patients, who received either accelerated hypofractionated radiotherapy (103 cases) or stereotactic body radiation therapy (56 cases), were included in the analysis. In the accelerated hypofractionated radiotherapy group, 40 (39%) cases were central tumors, whereas all cases were peripheral tumors in the stereotactic body radiation therapy group. Overall 5-year local control and survival rates were 81.9% (95% confidence interval 73.6%-90.1%) and 46.5% (95% confidence interval 36.7%-56.2%), respectively for the accelerated hypofractionated radiotherapy group, and 75.4% (95% confidence interval 63.0%-87.8%) and 44.6% (95% confidence interval 31.6%-57.7%), respectively for the stereotactic body radiation therapy group (n.s.). Among central tumors, ultracentral tumors (21 cases) and the remaining central tumors (19 cases) were similar in both local control and survival. On multivariate analysis, hazard ratios for accelerated hypofractionated radiotherapy versus stereotactic body radiation therapy were <1 for both local control and survival. Pulmonary toxicity was similar in both groups. No serial organ toxicity was observed for central tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Accelerated hypofractionated radiotherapy with a 75 Gy/25 fr/5 weeks regimen is promising in that it can obtain similar local control and survival results to stereotactic body radiation therapy, and it can control both central and peripheral tumors without any serial organ toxicities. Based on these results, prospective multicenter trials are worth conducting, especially for ultracentral tumors. SAGE Publications 2018-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6195005/ /pubmed/30317929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1533033818806318 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Karasawa, Katsuyuki
Hayakawa, Sara
Machitori, Yumiko
Shibata, Yukiko
Ogawa, Hiroaki
Ito, Kei
Shimizuguchi, Takuya
Kawamoto, Terufumi
Nihei, Keiji
Accelerated Hypofractionated Radiotherapy Versus Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Stage I Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer—A Single Institution Experience With Long-Term Follow-Up
title Accelerated Hypofractionated Radiotherapy Versus Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Stage I Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer—A Single Institution Experience With Long-Term Follow-Up
title_full Accelerated Hypofractionated Radiotherapy Versus Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Stage I Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer—A Single Institution Experience With Long-Term Follow-Up
title_fullStr Accelerated Hypofractionated Radiotherapy Versus Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Stage I Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer—A Single Institution Experience With Long-Term Follow-Up
title_full_unstemmed Accelerated Hypofractionated Radiotherapy Versus Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Stage I Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer—A Single Institution Experience With Long-Term Follow-Up
title_short Accelerated Hypofractionated Radiotherapy Versus Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Stage I Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer—A Single Institution Experience With Long-Term Follow-Up
title_sort accelerated hypofractionated radiotherapy versus stereotactic body radiotherapy for the treatment of stage i nonsmall cell lung cancer—a single institution experience with long-term follow-up
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6195005/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30317929
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1533033818806318
work_keys_str_mv AT karasawakatsuyuki acceleratedhypofractionatedradiotherapyversusstereotacticbodyradiotherapyforthetreatmentofstageinonsmallcelllungcancerasingleinstitutionexperiencewithlongtermfollowup
AT hayakawasara acceleratedhypofractionatedradiotherapyversusstereotacticbodyradiotherapyforthetreatmentofstageinonsmallcelllungcancerasingleinstitutionexperiencewithlongtermfollowup
AT machitoriyumiko acceleratedhypofractionatedradiotherapyversusstereotacticbodyradiotherapyforthetreatmentofstageinonsmallcelllungcancerasingleinstitutionexperiencewithlongtermfollowup
AT shibatayukiko acceleratedhypofractionatedradiotherapyversusstereotacticbodyradiotherapyforthetreatmentofstageinonsmallcelllungcancerasingleinstitutionexperiencewithlongtermfollowup
AT ogawahiroaki acceleratedhypofractionatedradiotherapyversusstereotacticbodyradiotherapyforthetreatmentofstageinonsmallcelllungcancerasingleinstitutionexperiencewithlongtermfollowup
AT itokei acceleratedhypofractionatedradiotherapyversusstereotacticbodyradiotherapyforthetreatmentofstageinonsmallcelllungcancerasingleinstitutionexperiencewithlongtermfollowup
AT shimizuguchitakuya acceleratedhypofractionatedradiotherapyversusstereotacticbodyradiotherapyforthetreatmentofstageinonsmallcelllungcancerasingleinstitutionexperiencewithlongtermfollowup
AT kawamototerufumi acceleratedhypofractionatedradiotherapyversusstereotacticbodyradiotherapyforthetreatmentofstageinonsmallcelllungcancerasingleinstitutionexperiencewithlongtermfollowup
AT niheikeiji acceleratedhypofractionatedradiotherapyversusstereotacticbodyradiotherapyforthetreatmentofstageinonsmallcelllungcancerasingleinstitutionexperiencewithlongtermfollowup