Cargando…
Antegrade versus retrograde facial nerve dissection in benign parotid surgery: Is there a difference in postoperative outcomes? A meta-analysis
OBJECTIVE: The primary aim of this meta-analysis was to test the null hypothesis of no difference in facial nerve dysfunction in studies that compared classical antegrade facial nerve dissection (AFND) versus retrograde facial nerve dissection (RFND) during benign parotid surgery. METHODS: A compreh...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6195282/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30339679 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206028 |
_version_ | 1783364369121280000 |
---|---|
author | Mashrah, Mubarak Ahmed Al-dhohrah, Taghrid Ahmed Al-zubeiry, Fahmi Ahmed Yan, Lingjian Al-Hamed, Faez Saleh Zhao, Xiaopeng Pan, Chaobin |
author_facet | Mashrah, Mubarak Ahmed Al-dhohrah, Taghrid Ahmed Al-zubeiry, Fahmi Ahmed Yan, Lingjian Al-Hamed, Faez Saleh Zhao, Xiaopeng Pan, Chaobin |
author_sort | Mashrah, Mubarak Ahmed |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The primary aim of this meta-analysis was to test the null hypothesis of no difference in facial nerve dysfunction in studies that compared classical antegrade facial nerve dissection (AFND) versus retrograde facial nerve dissection (RFND) during benign parotid surgery. METHODS: A comprehensive search of PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, Google Scholar, Science Direct and relevant journals was undertaken up to June 27, 2018. Randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs), controlled clinical trials (CCTs), and retrospective studies aimed at comparing the effect of AFND vs. RFND during parotidectomy were included. The outcome measures included facial nerve dysfunction, Frey’s syndrome, recurrence, silaocele, salivary fistula, operating time length of hospital stay, and estimated blood loss. Pooled risk ratio (RR) and weighted mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using either a fixed-effects or random-effects model. RESULTS: Ten studies; four RCTs and five retrospective studies were included. There were 570 patients (319 in RFND group and 251 in AFND group). 481 patients in 9 studies reported the incidence rate of facial nerve dysfunction. No statistical significant difference was observed between both groups concerning the occurrence of transient or permanent facial nerve paralysis (p = 0.44 and 0.11 respectively). One out 10 studies reported the incidence rate of sialocele, however no statistical difference was observed between the two techniques. There was reduction in the operative time (19.30 min), amount of blood loss (25.08 ml) and amount of healthy salivary tissues removed (12.20 mm) in RFND compared with AFND. CONCLUSIONS: According to the results of the current review there is no evidence demonstrating a significant advantage of one approach over another, therefore, well-designed standardized RCTs are required. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6195282 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61952822018-11-19 Antegrade versus retrograde facial nerve dissection in benign parotid surgery: Is there a difference in postoperative outcomes? A meta-analysis Mashrah, Mubarak Ahmed Al-dhohrah, Taghrid Ahmed Al-zubeiry, Fahmi Ahmed Yan, Lingjian Al-Hamed, Faez Saleh Zhao, Xiaopeng Pan, Chaobin PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: The primary aim of this meta-analysis was to test the null hypothesis of no difference in facial nerve dysfunction in studies that compared classical antegrade facial nerve dissection (AFND) versus retrograde facial nerve dissection (RFND) during benign parotid surgery. METHODS: A comprehensive search of PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, Google Scholar, Science Direct and relevant journals was undertaken up to June 27, 2018. Randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs), controlled clinical trials (CCTs), and retrospective studies aimed at comparing the effect of AFND vs. RFND during parotidectomy were included. The outcome measures included facial nerve dysfunction, Frey’s syndrome, recurrence, silaocele, salivary fistula, operating time length of hospital stay, and estimated blood loss. Pooled risk ratio (RR) and weighted mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using either a fixed-effects or random-effects model. RESULTS: Ten studies; four RCTs and five retrospective studies were included. There were 570 patients (319 in RFND group and 251 in AFND group). 481 patients in 9 studies reported the incidence rate of facial nerve dysfunction. No statistical significant difference was observed between both groups concerning the occurrence of transient or permanent facial nerve paralysis (p = 0.44 and 0.11 respectively). One out 10 studies reported the incidence rate of sialocele, however no statistical difference was observed between the two techniques. There was reduction in the operative time (19.30 min), amount of blood loss (25.08 ml) and amount of healthy salivary tissues removed (12.20 mm) in RFND compared with AFND. CONCLUSIONS: According to the results of the current review there is no evidence demonstrating a significant advantage of one approach over another, therefore, well-designed standardized RCTs are required. Public Library of Science 2018-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6195282/ /pubmed/30339679 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206028 Text en © 2018 Mashrah et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Mashrah, Mubarak Ahmed Al-dhohrah, Taghrid Ahmed Al-zubeiry, Fahmi Ahmed Yan, Lingjian Al-Hamed, Faez Saleh Zhao, Xiaopeng Pan, Chaobin Antegrade versus retrograde facial nerve dissection in benign parotid surgery: Is there a difference in postoperative outcomes? A meta-analysis |
title | Antegrade versus retrograde facial nerve dissection in benign parotid surgery: Is there a difference in postoperative outcomes? A meta-analysis |
title_full | Antegrade versus retrograde facial nerve dissection in benign parotid surgery: Is there a difference in postoperative outcomes? A meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Antegrade versus retrograde facial nerve dissection in benign parotid surgery: Is there a difference in postoperative outcomes? A meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Antegrade versus retrograde facial nerve dissection in benign parotid surgery: Is there a difference in postoperative outcomes? A meta-analysis |
title_short | Antegrade versus retrograde facial nerve dissection in benign parotid surgery: Is there a difference in postoperative outcomes? A meta-analysis |
title_sort | antegrade versus retrograde facial nerve dissection in benign parotid surgery: is there a difference in postoperative outcomes? a meta-analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6195282/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30339679 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206028 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mashrahmubarakahmed antegradeversusretrogradefacialnervedissectioninbenignparotidsurgeryisthereadifferenceinpostoperativeoutcomesametaanalysis AT aldhohrahtaghridahmed antegradeversusretrogradefacialnervedissectioninbenignparotidsurgeryisthereadifferenceinpostoperativeoutcomesametaanalysis AT alzubeiryfahmiahmed antegradeversusretrogradefacialnervedissectioninbenignparotidsurgeryisthereadifferenceinpostoperativeoutcomesametaanalysis AT yanlingjian antegradeversusretrogradefacialnervedissectioninbenignparotidsurgeryisthereadifferenceinpostoperativeoutcomesametaanalysis AT alhamedfaezsaleh antegradeversusretrogradefacialnervedissectioninbenignparotidsurgeryisthereadifferenceinpostoperativeoutcomesametaanalysis AT zhaoxiaopeng antegradeversusretrogradefacialnervedissectioninbenignparotidsurgeryisthereadifferenceinpostoperativeoutcomesametaanalysis AT panchaobin antegradeversusretrogradefacialnervedissectioninbenignparotidsurgeryisthereadifferenceinpostoperativeoutcomesametaanalysis |