Cargando…

Binocular Summation Revisited: Beyond √2

Our ability to detect faint images is better with two eyes than with one, but how great is this improvement? A meta-analysis of 65 studies published across more than 5 decades shows definitively that psychophysical binocular summation (the ratio of binocular to monocular contrast sensitivity) is sig...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baker, Daniel H., Lygo, Freya A., Meese, Tim S., Georgeson, Mark A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Psychological Association 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6195301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30102058
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/bul0000163
_version_ 1783364373751791616
author Baker, Daniel H.
Lygo, Freya A.
Meese, Tim S.
Georgeson, Mark A.
author_facet Baker, Daniel H.
Lygo, Freya A.
Meese, Tim S.
Georgeson, Mark A.
author_sort Baker, Daniel H.
collection PubMed
description Our ability to detect faint images is better with two eyes than with one, but how great is this improvement? A meta-analysis of 65 studies published across more than 5 decades shows definitively that psychophysical binocular summation (the ratio of binocular to monocular contrast sensitivity) is significantly greater than the canonical value of √2. Several methodological factors were also found to affect summation estimates. Binocular summation was significantly affected by both the spatial and temporal frequency of the stimulus, and stimulus speed (the ratio of temporal to spatial frequency) systematically predicts summation levels, with slow speeds (high spatial and low temporal frequencies) producing the strongest summation. We furthermore show that empirical summation estimates are affected by the ratio of monocular sensitivities, which varies across individuals, and is abnormal in visual disorders such as amblyopia. A simple modeling framework is presented to interpret the results of summation experiments. In combination with the empirical results, this model suggests that there is no single value for binocular summation, but instead that summation ratios depend on methodological factors that influence the strength of a nonlinearity occurring early in the visual pathway, before binocular combination of signals. Best practice methodological guidelines are proposed for obtaining accurate estimates of neural summation in future studies, including those involving patient groups with impaired binocular vision.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6195301
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher American Psychological Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61953012018-10-22 Binocular Summation Revisited: Beyond √2 Baker, Daniel H. Lygo, Freya A. Meese, Tim S. Georgeson, Mark A. Psychol Bull Article Our ability to detect faint images is better with two eyes than with one, but how great is this improvement? A meta-analysis of 65 studies published across more than 5 decades shows definitively that psychophysical binocular summation (the ratio of binocular to monocular contrast sensitivity) is significantly greater than the canonical value of √2. Several methodological factors were also found to affect summation estimates. Binocular summation was significantly affected by both the spatial and temporal frequency of the stimulus, and stimulus speed (the ratio of temporal to spatial frequency) systematically predicts summation levels, with slow speeds (high spatial and low temporal frequencies) producing the strongest summation. We furthermore show that empirical summation estimates are affected by the ratio of monocular sensitivities, which varies across individuals, and is abnormal in visual disorders such as amblyopia. A simple modeling framework is presented to interpret the results of summation experiments. In combination with the empirical results, this model suggests that there is no single value for binocular summation, but instead that summation ratios depend on methodological factors that influence the strength of a nonlinearity occurring early in the visual pathway, before binocular combination of signals. Best practice methodological guidelines are proposed for obtaining accurate estimates of neural summation in future studies, including those involving patient groups with impaired binocular vision. American Psychological Association 2018-08-13 2018-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6195301/ /pubmed/30102058 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/bul0000163 Text en © 2018 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This article has been published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Copyright for this article is retained by the author(s). Author(s) grant(s) the American Psychological Association the exclusive right to publish the article and identify itself as the original publisher.
spellingShingle Article
Baker, Daniel H.
Lygo, Freya A.
Meese, Tim S.
Georgeson, Mark A.
Binocular Summation Revisited: Beyond √2
title Binocular Summation Revisited: Beyond √2
title_full Binocular Summation Revisited: Beyond √2
title_fullStr Binocular Summation Revisited: Beyond √2
title_full_unstemmed Binocular Summation Revisited: Beyond √2
title_short Binocular Summation Revisited: Beyond √2
title_sort binocular summation revisited: beyond √2
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6195301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30102058
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/bul0000163
work_keys_str_mv AT bakerdanielh binocularsummationrevisitedbeyond2
AT lygofreyaa binocularsummationrevisitedbeyond2
AT meesetims binocularsummationrevisitedbeyond2
AT georgesonmarka binocularsummationrevisitedbeyond2