Cargando…

The biomass–density relationship in seagrasses and its use as an ecological indicator

BACKGROUND: Biomass–density relations have been at the centre of a search for an index which describes the health of seagrass meadows. However, this search has been complicated by the intricacy of seagrass demographics and their complex biomass–density relations, a consequence mainly of their modula...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vieira, Vasco M. N. C. S., Lopes, Inês E., Creed, Joel C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6195692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30340566
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12898-018-0200-1
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Biomass–density relations have been at the centre of a search for an index which describes the health of seagrass meadows. However, this search has been complicated by the intricacy of seagrass demographics and their complex biomass–density relations, a consequence mainly of their modular growth and clonality. Concomitantly, biomass–density upper boundaries have been determined for terrestrial plants and algae, reflecting their asymptotic maximum efficiencies of space occupation. Each stand’s distance to its respective biomass–density upper boundary reflects its effective efficiency in packing biomass, which has proved a reliable ecological indicator in order to discriminate between taxonomic groups, functional groups and clonal vs. non-clonal growth. RESULTS: We gathered data from 32 studies on 10 seagrass species distributed worldwide and demonstrated that seagrasses are limited by their own boundary line, placed below the boundaries previously determined for algae and terrestrial plants. Then, we applied a new metric—d(grass): each stand’s perpendicular distance to the seagrass boundary—and used this parameter to review fundamental aspects such as clonal growth patterns, depth distribution, seasonality, interspecific competition, and the effects of light, temperature and nutrients. CONCLUSIONS: Seagrasses occupy space less efficiently than algae and terrestrial plants. Using only their biomass and density data we established a new and efficient tool to describe space occupation by seagrasses. This was used with success to evaluate their meadows as an ecological indicator for the health of coastal ecosystems. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12898-018-0200-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.