Cargando…
The effects of a subsequent jump on the knee abduction angle during the early landing phase
BACKGROUND: A double-leg landing with or without a subsequent jump is commonly used to evaluate the neuromuscular control of knee abduction. However, the differences in frontal plane knee biomechanics between landings with and without a subsequent jump are not well known. The purpose of the present...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6195693/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30342498 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2291-4 |
_version_ | 1783364435753041920 |
---|---|
author | Ishida, Tomoya Koshino, Yuta Yamanaka, Masanori Ueno, Ryo Taniguchi, Shohei Samukawa, Mina Saito, Hiroshi Matsumoto, Hisashi Aoki, Yoshimitsu Tohyama, Harukazu |
author_facet | Ishida, Tomoya Koshino, Yuta Yamanaka, Masanori Ueno, Ryo Taniguchi, Shohei Samukawa, Mina Saito, Hiroshi Matsumoto, Hisashi Aoki, Yoshimitsu Tohyama, Harukazu |
author_sort | Ishida, Tomoya |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A double-leg landing with or without a subsequent jump is commonly used to evaluate the neuromuscular control of knee abduction. However, the differences in frontal plane knee biomechanics between landings with and without a subsequent jump are not well known. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effects of a subsequent jump on knee abduction, including during the early landing phase, in female and male subjects. METHODS: Twenty-one female subjects and 21 male subjects participated. All subjects performed drop landing task (a landing without a subsequent jump) and drop vertical jump task (a landing with a subsequent jump). The subjects landed from a 30-cm height. In drop vertical jump, the subjects also performed a maximum vertical jump immediately after landing. The knee abduction angle and moment were analyzed using a 3D motion analysis system. A two-way analysis of variance (task × time) was performed to examine the effects of a subsequent jump on the knee abduction angle during the early landing phase in female and male subjects. Another two-way analysis of variance (task × sex) was performed to compare peak knee abduction angles and moments. RESULTS: In female subjects, the knee abduction angle was significantly greater during drop vertical jump than during drop landing, as measured 45 to 80 ms after initial contact (P < 0.05). Significant task-dependent effects in the peak knee abduction angle (P = 0.001) and the abduction moment (P = 0.029) were detected. The peak knee abduction angle and the abduction moment were greater during drop vertical jump than during drop landing. CONCLUSIONS: Subsequent jumps cause greater knee abduction during the early landing phase only in female subjects. This finding may relate to the sex discrepancy in non-contact anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Additionally, the presence of a subsequent jump significantly increases the peak knee abduction angle and the peak knee abduction moment during landings. Therefore, compared with a landing task without a subsequent jump (drop landing), a landing task with a subsequent jump (drop vertical jump) may be advantageous for screening for knee abduction control, especially in female athletes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6195693 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61956932018-10-30 The effects of a subsequent jump on the knee abduction angle during the early landing phase Ishida, Tomoya Koshino, Yuta Yamanaka, Masanori Ueno, Ryo Taniguchi, Shohei Samukawa, Mina Saito, Hiroshi Matsumoto, Hisashi Aoki, Yoshimitsu Tohyama, Harukazu BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: A double-leg landing with or without a subsequent jump is commonly used to evaluate the neuromuscular control of knee abduction. However, the differences in frontal plane knee biomechanics between landings with and without a subsequent jump are not well known. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effects of a subsequent jump on knee abduction, including during the early landing phase, in female and male subjects. METHODS: Twenty-one female subjects and 21 male subjects participated. All subjects performed drop landing task (a landing without a subsequent jump) and drop vertical jump task (a landing with a subsequent jump). The subjects landed from a 30-cm height. In drop vertical jump, the subjects also performed a maximum vertical jump immediately after landing. The knee abduction angle and moment were analyzed using a 3D motion analysis system. A two-way analysis of variance (task × time) was performed to examine the effects of a subsequent jump on the knee abduction angle during the early landing phase in female and male subjects. Another two-way analysis of variance (task × sex) was performed to compare peak knee abduction angles and moments. RESULTS: In female subjects, the knee abduction angle was significantly greater during drop vertical jump than during drop landing, as measured 45 to 80 ms after initial contact (P < 0.05). Significant task-dependent effects in the peak knee abduction angle (P = 0.001) and the abduction moment (P = 0.029) were detected. The peak knee abduction angle and the abduction moment were greater during drop vertical jump than during drop landing. CONCLUSIONS: Subsequent jumps cause greater knee abduction during the early landing phase only in female subjects. This finding may relate to the sex discrepancy in non-contact anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Additionally, the presence of a subsequent jump significantly increases the peak knee abduction angle and the peak knee abduction moment during landings. Therefore, compared with a landing task without a subsequent jump (drop landing), a landing task with a subsequent jump (drop vertical jump) may be advantageous for screening for knee abduction control, especially in female athletes. BioMed Central 2018-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6195693/ /pubmed/30342498 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2291-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ishida, Tomoya Koshino, Yuta Yamanaka, Masanori Ueno, Ryo Taniguchi, Shohei Samukawa, Mina Saito, Hiroshi Matsumoto, Hisashi Aoki, Yoshimitsu Tohyama, Harukazu The effects of a subsequent jump on the knee abduction angle during the early landing phase |
title | The effects of a subsequent jump on the knee abduction angle during the early landing phase |
title_full | The effects of a subsequent jump on the knee abduction angle during the early landing phase |
title_fullStr | The effects of a subsequent jump on the knee abduction angle during the early landing phase |
title_full_unstemmed | The effects of a subsequent jump on the knee abduction angle during the early landing phase |
title_short | The effects of a subsequent jump on the knee abduction angle during the early landing phase |
title_sort | effects of a subsequent jump on the knee abduction angle during the early landing phase |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6195693/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30342498 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2291-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ishidatomoya theeffectsofasubsequentjumponthekneeabductionangleduringtheearlylandingphase AT koshinoyuta theeffectsofasubsequentjumponthekneeabductionangleduringtheearlylandingphase AT yamanakamasanori theeffectsofasubsequentjumponthekneeabductionangleduringtheearlylandingphase AT uenoryo theeffectsofasubsequentjumponthekneeabductionangleduringtheearlylandingphase AT taniguchishohei theeffectsofasubsequentjumponthekneeabductionangleduringtheearlylandingphase AT samukawamina theeffectsofasubsequentjumponthekneeabductionangleduringtheearlylandingphase AT saitohiroshi theeffectsofasubsequentjumponthekneeabductionangleduringtheearlylandingphase AT matsumotohisashi theeffectsofasubsequentjumponthekneeabductionangleduringtheearlylandingphase AT aokiyoshimitsu theeffectsofasubsequentjumponthekneeabductionangleduringtheearlylandingphase AT tohyamaharukazu theeffectsofasubsequentjumponthekneeabductionangleduringtheearlylandingphase AT ishidatomoya effectsofasubsequentjumponthekneeabductionangleduringtheearlylandingphase AT koshinoyuta effectsofasubsequentjumponthekneeabductionangleduringtheearlylandingphase AT yamanakamasanori effectsofasubsequentjumponthekneeabductionangleduringtheearlylandingphase AT uenoryo effectsofasubsequentjumponthekneeabductionangleduringtheearlylandingphase AT taniguchishohei effectsofasubsequentjumponthekneeabductionangleduringtheearlylandingphase AT samukawamina effectsofasubsequentjumponthekneeabductionangleduringtheearlylandingphase AT saitohiroshi effectsofasubsequentjumponthekneeabductionangleduringtheearlylandingphase AT matsumotohisashi effectsofasubsequentjumponthekneeabductionangleduringtheearlylandingphase AT aokiyoshimitsu effectsofasubsequentjumponthekneeabductionangleduringtheearlylandingphase AT tohyamaharukazu effectsofasubsequentjumponthekneeabductionangleduringtheearlylandingphase |