Cargando…

The effects of a subsequent jump on the knee abduction angle during the early landing phase

BACKGROUND: A double-leg landing with or without a subsequent jump is commonly used to evaluate the neuromuscular control of knee abduction. However, the differences in frontal plane knee biomechanics between landings with and without a subsequent jump are not well known. The purpose of the present...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ishida, Tomoya, Koshino, Yuta, Yamanaka, Masanori, Ueno, Ryo, Taniguchi, Shohei, Samukawa, Mina, Saito, Hiroshi, Matsumoto, Hisashi, Aoki, Yoshimitsu, Tohyama, Harukazu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6195693/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30342498
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2291-4
_version_ 1783364435753041920
author Ishida, Tomoya
Koshino, Yuta
Yamanaka, Masanori
Ueno, Ryo
Taniguchi, Shohei
Samukawa, Mina
Saito, Hiroshi
Matsumoto, Hisashi
Aoki, Yoshimitsu
Tohyama, Harukazu
author_facet Ishida, Tomoya
Koshino, Yuta
Yamanaka, Masanori
Ueno, Ryo
Taniguchi, Shohei
Samukawa, Mina
Saito, Hiroshi
Matsumoto, Hisashi
Aoki, Yoshimitsu
Tohyama, Harukazu
author_sort Ishida, Tomoya
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A double-leg landing with or without a subsequent jump is commonly used to evaluate the neuromuscular control of knee abduction. However, the differences in frontal plane knee biomechanics between landings with and without a subsequent jump are not well known. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effects of a subsequent jump on knee abduction, including during the early landing phase, in female and male subjects. METHODS: Twenty-one female subjects and 21 male subjects participated. All subjects performed drop landing task (a landing without a subsequent jump) and drop vertical jump task (a landing with a subsequent jump). The subjects landed from a 30-cm height. In drop vertical jump, the subjects also performed a maximum vertical jump immediately after landing. The knee abduction angle and moment were analyzed using a 3D motion analysis system. A two-way analysis of variance (task × time) was performed to examine the effects of a subsequent jump on the knee abduction angle during the early landing phase in female and male subjects. Another two-way analysis of variance (task × sex) was performed to compare peak knee abduction angles and moments. RESULTS: In female subjects, the knee abduction angle was significantly greater during drop vertical jump than during drop landing, as measured 45 to 80 ms after initial contact (P < 0.05). Significant task-dependent effects in the peak knee abduction angle (P = 0.001) and the abduction moment (P = 0.029) were detected. The peak knee abduction angle and the abduction moment were greater during drop vertical jump than during drop landing. CONCLUSIONS: Subsequent jumps cause greater knee abduction during the early landing phase only in female subjects. This finding may relate to the sex discrepancy in non-contact anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Additionally, the presence of a subsequent jump significantly increases the peak knee abduction angle and the peak knee abduction moment during landings. Therefore, compared with a landing task without a subsequent jump (drop landing), a landing task with a subsequent jump (drop vertical jump) may be advantageous for screening for knee abduction control, especially in female athletes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6195693
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61956932018-10-30 The effects of a subsequent jump on the knee abduction angle during the early landing phase Ishida, Tomoya Koshino, Yuta Yamanaka, Masanori Ueno, Ryo Taniguchi, Shohei Samukawa, Mina Saito, Hiroshi Matsumoto, Hisashi Aoki, Yoshimitsu Tohyama, Harukazu BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: A double-leg landing with or without a subsequent jump is commonly used to evaluate the neuromuscular control of knee abduction. However, the differences in frontal plane knee biomechanics between landings with and without a subsequent jump are not well known. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effects of a subsequent jump on knee abduction, including during the early landing phase, in female and male subjects. METHODS: Twenty-one female subjects and 21 male subjects participated. All subjects performed drop landing task (a landing without a subsequent jump) and drop vertical jump task (a landing with a subsequent jump). The subjects landed from a 30-cm height. In drop vertical jump, the subjects also performed a maximum vertical jump immediately after landing. The knee abduction angle and moment were analyzed using a 3D motion analysis system. A two-way analysis of variance (task × time) was performed to examine the effects of a subsequent jump on the knee abduction angle during the early landing phase in female and male subjects. Another two-way analysis of variance (task × sex) was performed to compare peak knee abduction angles and moments. RESULTS: In female subjects, the knee abduction angle was significantly greater during drop vertical jump than during drop landing, as measured 45 to 80 ms after initial contact (P < 0.05). Significant task-dependent effects in the peak knee abduction angle (P = 0.001) and the abduction moment (P = 0.029) were detected. The peak knee abduction angle and the abduction moment were greater during drop vertical jump than during drop landing. CONCLUSIONS: Subsequent jumps cause greater knee abduction during the early landing phase only in female subjects. This finding may relate to the sex discrepancy in non-contact anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Additionally, the presence of a subsequent jump significantly increases the peak knee abduction angle and the peak knee abduction moment during landings. Therefore, compared with a landing task without a subsequent jump (drop landing), a landing task with a subsequent jump (drop vertical jump) may be advantageous for screening for knee abduction control, especially in female athletes. BioMed Central 2018-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6195693/ /pubmed/30342498 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2291-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ishida, Tomoya
Koshino, Yuta
Yamanaka, Masanori
Ueno, Ryo
Taniguchi, Shohei
Samukawa, Mina
Saito, Hiroshi
Matsumoto, Hisashi
Aoki, Yoshimitsu
Tohyama, Harukazu
The effects of a subsequent jump on the knee abduction angle during the early landing phase
title The effects of a subsequent jump on the knee abduction angle during the early landing phase
title_full The effects of a subsequent jump on the knee abduction angle during the early landing phase
title_fullStr The effects of a subsequent jump on the knee abduction angle during the early landing phase
title_full_unstemmed The effects of a subsequent jump on the knee abduction angle during the early landing phase
title_short The effects of a subsequent jump on the knee abduction angle during the early landing phase
title_sort effects of a subsequent jump on the knee abduction angle during the early landing phase
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6195693/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30342498
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2291-4
work_keys_str_mv AT ishidatomoya theeffectsofasubsequentjumponthekneeabductionangleduringtheearlylandingphase
AT koshinoyuta theeffectsofasubsequentjumponthekneeabductionangleduringtheearlylandingphase
AT yamanakamasanori theeffectsofasubsequentjumponthekneeabductionangleduringtheearlylandingphase
AT uenoryo theeffectsofasubsequentjumponthekneeabductionangleduringtheearlylandingphase
AT taniguchishohei theeffectsofasubsequentjumponthekneeabductionangleduringtheearlylandingphase
AT samukawamina theeffectsofasubsequentjumponthekneeabductionangleduringtheearlylandingphase
AT saitohiroshi theeffectsofasubsequentjumponthekneeabductionangleduringtheearlylandingphase
AT matsumotohisashi theeffectsofasubsequentjumponthekneeabductionangleduringtheearlylandingphase
AT aokiyoshimitsu theeffectsofasubsequentjumponthekneeabductionangleduringtheearlylandingphase
AT tohyamaharukazu theeffectsofasubsequentjumponthekneeabductionangleduringtheearlylandingphase
AT ishidatomoya effectsofasubsequentjumponthekneeabductionangleduringtheearlylandingphase
AT koshinoyuta effectsofasubsequentjumponthekneeabductionangleduringtheearlylandingphase
AT yamanakamasanori effectsofasubsequentjumponthekneeabductionangleduringtheearlylandingphase
AT uenoryo effectsofasubsequentjumponthekneeabductionangleduringtheearlylandingphase
AT taniguchishohei effectsofasubsequentjumponthekneeabductionangleduringtheearlylandingphase
AT samukawamina effectsofasubsequentjumponthekneeabductionangleduringtheearlylandingphase
AT saitohiroshi effectsofasubsequentjumponthekneeabductionangleduringtheearlylandingphase
AT matsumotohisashi effectsofasubsequentjumponthekneeabductionangleduringtheearlylandingphase
AT aokiyoshimitsu effectsofasubsequentjumponthekneeabductionangleduringtheearlylandingphase
AT tohyamaharukazu effectsofasubsequentjumponthekneeabductionangleduringtheearlylandingphase