Cargando…

Video clinics versus standard face-to-face appointments for liver transplant patients in routine hospital outpatient care: study protocol for a pragmatic randomised evaluation of myVideoClinic

BACKGROUND: Video clinics, where patients can have a hospital appointment with their clinician from home, are emerging in practice, but their effectiveness is unclear. This study will evaluate whether a video clinic implemented at the University Hospitals Birmingham (UHB) NHS Foundation Trust improv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O’Connell Francischetto, Elaine, Damery, Sarah, Ferguson, James, Combes, Gill
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6195722/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30340637
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2953-4
_version_ 1783364442663157760
author O’Connell Francischetto, Elaine
Damery, Sarah
Ferguson, James
Combes, Gill
author_facet O’Connell Francischetto, Elaine
Damery, Sarah
Ferguson, James
Combes, Gill
author_sort O’Connell Francischetto, Elaine
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Video clinics, where patients can have a hospital appointment with their clinician from home, are emerging in practice, but their effectiveness is unclear. This study will evaluate whether a video clinic implemented at the University Hospitals Birmingham (UHB) NHS Foundation Trust improves patient satisfaction compared to standard face-to-face appointments for liver transplant patients. METHODS: This will be a parallel, two-arm, statistician-blinded, randomised evaluation. Clinically stable liver patients at 1 to 5 years post-transplant (n = 180) will be randomised in equal numbers to video clinic appointments (intervention) or standard face-to-face appointments (control). The intervention group will have outpatient appointments from home via a secure video link accessed through the UHB patient portal. All patients will complete baseline questionnaires before randomisation and electronic follow-up questionnaires after each follow-up appointment during the subsequent 12 months. The primary outcome is the difference in scores between groups for three domains of patient satisfaction, namely ‘convenience of location’, ‘getting through to the office by phone’ and ‘length of time waiting’ (modified Visit-Specific Satisfaction Instrument). Secondary outcomes include quality of life (EQ-5D-5 L), costs, clinical contacts and user experience. Statistical analysis will be descriptive and performed on an intention-to-treat basis. The primary outcome will be analysed using baseline and 3-, 6-, 9- and 12-month questionnaires (according to patient follow-up appointment frequency) and comparisons made between study arms. A within-trial cost consequences analysis will be undertaken on the economic data. Patients (n = 8), carers/family members (n = 6) and health professionals (n = 14) will be interviewed about the experience of video clinics and the interviews will be analysed using thematic analysis. DISCUSSION: This study will allow an in depth understanding of whether video clinics can improve patient satisfaction with their care. In addition, the intervention could save patients time and costs, removing the need to travel long distances for outpatient appointments. Video clinics may be applicable to a wide range of other clinical settings and health conditions. The study has been approved by the NHS Health Research Authority and a National Research Ethics Committee (Ref: 17/WM/0338) and research governance approval has been obtained from UHB (Ref: RRK6080). TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN: 14093266 (25/03/2018; retrospectively registered). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-2953-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6195722
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61957222018-10-30 Video clinics versus standard face-to-face appointments for liver transplant patients in routine hospital outpatient care: study protocol for a pragmatic randomised evaluation of myVideoClinic O’Connell Francischetto, Elaine Damery, Sarah Ferguson, James Combes, Gill Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Video clinics, where patients can have a hospital appointment with their clinician from home, are emerging in practice, but their effectiveness is unclear. This study will evaluate whether a video clinic implemented at the University Hospitals Birmingham (UHB) NHS Foundation Trust improves patient satisfaction compared to standard face-to-face appointments for liver transplant patients. METHODS: This will be a parallel, two-arm, statistician-blinded, randomised evaluation. Clinically stable liver patients at 1 to 5 years post-transplant (n = 180) will be randomised in equal numbers to video clinic appointments (intervention) or standard face-to-face appointments (control). The intervention group will have outpatient appointments from home via a secure video link accessed through the UHB patient portal. All patients will complete baseline questionnaires before randomisation and electronic follow-up questionnaires after each follow-up appointment during the subsequent 12 months. The primary outcome is the difference in scores between groups for three domains of patient satisfaction, namely ‘convenience of location’, ‘getting through to the office by phone’ and ‘length of time waiting’ (modified Visit-Specific Satisfaction Instrument). Secondary outcomes include quality of life (EQ-5D-5 L), costs, clinical contacts and user experience. Statistical analysis will be descriptive and performed on an intention-to-treat basis. The primary outcome will be analysed using baseline and 3-, 6-, 9- and 12-month questionnaires (according to patient follow-up appointment frequency) and comparisons made between study arms. A within-trial cost consequences analysis will be undertaken on the economic data. Patients (n = 8), carers/family members (n = 6) and health professionals (n = 14) will be interviewed about the experience of video clinics and the interviews will be analysed using thematic analysis. DISCUSSION: This study will allow an in depth understanding of whether video clinics can improve patient satisfaction with their care. In addition, the intervention could save patients time and costs, removing the need to travel long distances for outpatient appointments. Video clinics may be applicable to a wide range of other clinical settings and health conditions. The study has been approved by the NHS Health Research Authority and a National Research Ethics Committee (Ref: 17/WM/0338) and research governance approval has been obtained from UHB (Ref: RRK6080). TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN: 14093266 (25/03/2018; retrospectively registered). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-2953-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6195722/ /pubmed/30340637 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2953-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
O’Connell Francischetto, Elaine
Damery, Sarah
Ferguson, James
Combes, Gill
Video clinics versus standard face-to-face appointments for liver transplant patients in routine hospital outpatient care: study protocol for a pragmatic randomised evaluation of myVideoClinic
title Video clinics versus standard face-to-face appointments for liver transplant patients in routine hospital outpatient care: study protocol for a pragmatic randomised evaluation of myVideoClinic
title_full Video clinics versus standard face-to-face appointments for liver transplant patients in routine hospital outpatient care: study protocol for a pragmatic randomised evaluation of myVideoClinic
title_fullStr Video clinics versus standard face-to-face appointments for liver transplant patients in routine hospital outpatient care: study protocol for a pragmatic randomised evaluation of myVideoClinic
title_full_unstemmed Video clinics versus standard face-to-face appointments for liver transplant patients in routine hospital outpatient care: study protocol for a pragmatic randomised evaluation of myVideoClinic
title_short Video clinics versus standard face-to-face appointments for liver transplant patients in routine hospital outpatient care: study protocol for a pragmatic randomised evaluation of myVideoClinic
title_sort video clinics versus standard face-to-face appointments for liver transplant patients in routine hospital outpatient care: study protocol for a pragmatic randomised evaluation of myvideoclinic
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6195722/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30340637
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2953-4
work_keys_str_mv AT oconnellfrancischettoelaine videoclinicsversusstandardfacetofaceappointmentsforlivertransplantpatientsinroutinehospitaloutpatientcarestudyprotocolforapragmaticrandomisedevaluationofmyvideoclinic
AT damerysarah videoclinicsversusstandardfacetofaceappointmentsforlivertransplantpatientsinroutinehospitaloutpatientcarestudyprotocolforapragmaticrandomisedevaluationofmyvideoclinic
AT fergusonjames videoclinicsversusstandardfacetofaceappointmentsforlivertransplantpatientsinroutinehospitaloutpatientcarestudyprotocolforapragmaticrandomisedevaluationofmyvideoclinic
AT combesgill videoclinicsversusstandardfacetofaceappointmentsforlivertransplantpatientsinroutinehospitaloutpatientcarestudyprotocolforapragmaticrandomisedevaluationofmyvideoclinic
AT videoclinicsversusstandardfacetofaceappointmentsforlivertransplantpatientsinroutinehospitaloutpatientcarestudyprotocolforapragmaticrandomisedevaluationofmyvideoclinic