Cargando…

Appraisal of systemic inflammation and diagnostic markers in a porcine model of VAP: secondary analysis from a study on novel preventive strategies

BACKGROUND: We previously evaluated the efficacy of a ventilatory strategy to achieve expiratory flow bias and positive end-expiratory pressure (EFB + PEEP) or the Trendelenburg position (TP) for the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). These preventive measures were aimed at improvi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li Bassi, Gianluigi, Prats, Raquel Guillamat, Artigas, Antonio, Xiol, Eli Aguilera, Marti, Joan-Daniel, Ranzani, Otavio T., Rigol, Montserrat, Fernandez, Laia, Meli, Andrea, Battaglini, Denise, Luque, Nestor, Ferrer, Miguel, Martin-Loeches, Ignacio, Póvoa, Pedro, Chiumello, Davide, Pelosi, Paolo, Torres, Antoni
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6195872/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30343359
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40635-018-0206-1
_version_ 1783364465336516608
author Li Bassi, Gianluigi
Prats, Raquel Guillamat
Artigas, Antonio
Xiol, Eli Aguilera
Marti, Joan-Daniel
Ranzani, Otavio T.
Rigol, Montserrat
Fernandez, Laia
Meli, Andrea
Battaglini, Denise
Luque, Nestor
Ferrer, Miguel
Martin-Loeches, Ignacio
Póvoa, Pedro
Chiumello, Davide
Pelosi, Paolo
Torres, Antoni
author_facet Li Bassi, Gianluigi
Prats, Raquel Guillamat
Artigas, Antonio
Xiol, Eli Aguilera
Marti, Joan-Daniel
Ranzani, Otavio T.
Rigol, Montserrat
Fernandez, Laia
Meli, Andrea
Battaglini, Denise
Luque, Nestor
Ferrer, Miguel
Martin-Loeches, Ignacio
Póvoa, Pedro
Chiumello, Davide
Pelosi, Paolo
Torres, Antoni
author_sort Li Bassi, Gianluigi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We previously evaluated the efficacy of a ventilatory strategy to achieve expiratory flow bias and positive end-expiratory pressure (EFB + PEEP) or the Trendelenburg position (TP) for the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). These preventive measures were aimed at improving mucus clearance and reducing pulmonary aspiration of bacteria-laden oropharyngeal secretions. This secondary analysis is aimed at evaluating the effects of aforementioned interventions on systemic inflammation and to substantiate the value of clinical parameters and cytokines in the diagnosis of VAP. METHODS: Twenty female pigs were randomized to be positioned in the semirecumbent/prone position, and ventilated with duty cycle 0.33 and without PEEP (control); positioned as in the control group, PEEP 5 cmH(2)O, and duty cycle to achieve expiratory flow bias (EFB+PEEP); ventilated as in the control group, but in the Trendelenburg position (Trendelenburg). Following randomization, P. aeruginosa was instilled into the oropharynx. Systemic cytokines and tracheal secretions P. aeruginosa concentration were quantified every 24h. Lung biopsies were collected for microbiological confirmation of VAP. RESULTS: In the control, EFB + PEEP, and Trendelenburg groups, lung tissue Pseudomonas aeruginosa concentration was 2.4 ± 1.5, 1.9 ± 2.1, and 0.3 ± 0.6 log cfu/mL, respectively (p = 0.020). Whereas, it was 2.4 ± 1.9 and 0.6 ± 0.9 log cfu/mL in animals with or without VAP (p < 0.001). Lower levels of interleukin (IL)-1β (p = 0.021), IL-1RA (p < 0.001), IL-4 (p = 0.005), IL-8 (p = 0.008), and IL-18 (p = 0.050) were found in Trendelenburg animals. VAP increased IL-10 (p = 0.035), tumor necrosis factor-α (p = 0.041), and endotracheal aspirate (ETA) P. aeruginosa concentration (p = 0.024). A model comprising ETA bacterial burden, IL-10, and TNF-α yielded moderate discrimination for the diagnosis of VAP (area of the receiver operating curve 0.82, 95% CI 0.61–1.00). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate anti-inflammatory effects associated with the Trendelenburg position. In this reliable model of VAP, ETA culture showed good diagnostic accuracy, whereas systemic IL-10 and TNF-α marginally improved accuracy. Further clinical studies will be necessary to confirm clinical value of the Trendelenburg position as a measure to hinder inflammation during mechanical ventilation and significance of systemic IL-10 and TNF-α in the diagnosis of VAP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6195872
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61958722018-11-02 Appraisal of systemic inflammation and diagnostic markers in a porcine model of VAP: secondary analysis from a study on novel preventive strategies Li Bassi, Gianluigi Prats, Raquel Guillamat Artigas, Antonio Xiol, Eli Aguilera Marti, Joan-Daniel Ranzani, Otavio T. Rigol, Montserrat Fernandez, Laia Meli, Andrea Battaglini, Denise Luque, Nestor Ferrer, Miguel Martin-Loeches, Ignacio Póvoa, Pedro Chiumello, Davide Pelosi, Paolo Torres, Antoni Intensive Care Med Exp Research BACKGROUND: We previously evaluated the efficacy of a ventilatory strategy to achieve expiratory flow bias and positive end-expiratory pressure (EFB + PEEP) or the Trendelenburg position (TP) for the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). These preventive measures were aimed at improving mucus clearance and reducing pulmonary aspiration of bacteria-laden oropharyngeal secretions. This secondary analysis is aimed at evaluating the effects of aforementioned interventions on systemic inflammation and to substantiate the value of clinical parameters and cytokines in the diagnosis of VAP. METHODS: Twenty female pigs were randomized to be positioned in the semirecumbent/prone position, and ventilated with duty cycle 0.33 and without PEEP (control); positioned as in the control group, PEEP 5 cmH(2)O, and duty cycle to achieve expiratory flow bias (EFB+PEEP); ventilated as in the control group, but in the Trendelenburg position (Trendelenburg). Following randomization, P. aeruginosa was instilled into the oropharynx. Systemic cytokines and tracheal secretions P. aeruginosa concentration were quantified every 24h. Lung biopsies were collected for microbiological confirmation of VAP. RESULTS: In the control, EFB + PEEP, and Trendelenburg groups, lung tissue Pseudomonas aeruginosa concentration was 2.4 ± 1.5, 1.9 ± 2.1, and 0.3 ± 0.6 log cfu/mL, respectively (p = 0.020). Whereas, it was 2.4 ± 1.9 and 0.6 ± 0.9 log cfu/mL in animals with or without VAP (p < 0.001). Lower levels of interleukin (IL)-1β (p = 0.021), IL-1RA (p < 0.001), IL-4 (p = 0.005), IL-8 (p = 0.008), and IL-18 (p = 0.050) were found in Trendelenburg animals. VAP increased IL-10 (p = 0.035), tumor necrosis factor-α (p = 0.041), and endotracheal aspirate (ETA) P. aeruginosa concentration (p = 0.024). A model comprising ETA bacterial burden, IL-10, and TNF-α yielded moderate discrimination for the diagnosis of VAP (area of the receiver operating curve 0.82, 95% CI 0.61–1.00). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate anti-inflammatory effects associated with the Trendelenburg position. In this reliable model of VAP, ETA culture showed good diagnostic accuracy, whereas systemic IL-10 and TNF-α marginally improved accuracy. Further clinical studies will be necessary to confirm clinical value of the Trendelenburg position as a measure to hinder inflammation during mechanical ventilation and significance of systemic IL-10 and TNF-α in the diagnosis of VAP. Springer International Publishing 2018-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6195872/ /pubmed/30343359 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40635-018-0206-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Li Bassi, Gianluigi
Prats, Raquel Guillamat
Artigas, Antonio
Xiol, Eli Aguilera
Marti, Joan-Daniel
Ranzani, Otavio T.
Rigol, Montserrat
Fernandez, Laia
Meli, Andrea
Battaglini, Denise
Luque, Nestor
Ferrer, Miguel
Martin-Loeches, Ignacio
Póvoa, Pedro
Chiumello, Davide
Pelosi, Paolo
Torres, Antoni
Appraisal of systemic inflammation and diagnostic markers in a porcine model of VAP: secondary analysis from a study on novel preventive strategies
title Appraisal of systemic inflammation and diagnostic markers in a porcine model of VAP: secondary analysis from a study on novel preventive strategies
title_full Appraisal of systemic inflammation and diagnostic markers in a porcine model of VAP: secondary analysis from a study on novel preventive strategies
title_fullStr Appraisal of systemic inflammation and diagnostic markers in a porcine model of VAP: secondary analysis from a study on novel preventive strategies
title_full_unstemmed Appraisal of systemic inflammation and diagnostic markers in a porcine model of VAP: secondary analysis from a study on novel preventive strategies
title_short Appraisal of systemic inflammation and diagnostic markers in a porcine model of VAP: secondary analysis from a study on novel preventive strategies
title_sort appraisal of systemic inflammation and diagnostic markers in a porcine model of vap: secondary analysis from a study on novel preventive strategies
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6195872/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30343359
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40635-018-0206-1
work_keys_str_mv AT libassigianluigi appraisalofsystemicinflammationanddiagnosticmarkersinaporcinemodelofvapsecondaryanalysisfromastudyonnovelpreventivestrategies
AT pratsraquelguillamat appraisalofsystemicinflammationanddiagnosticmarkersinaporcinemodelofvapsecondaryanalysisfromastudyonnovelpreventivestrategies
AT artigasantonio appraisalofsystemicinflammationanddiagnosticmarkersinaporcinemodelofvapsecondaryanalysisfromastudyonnovelpreventivestrategies
AT xioleliaguilera appraisalofsystemicinflammationanddiagnosticmarkersinaporcinemodelofvapsecondaryanalysisfromastudyonnovelpreventivestrategies
AT martijoandaniel appraisalofsystemicinflammationanddiagnosticmarkersinaporcinemodelofvapsecondaryanalysisfromastudyonnovelpreventivestrategies
AT ranzaniotaviot appraisalofsystemicinflammationanddiagnosticmarkersinaporcinemodelofvapsecondaryanalysisfromastudyonnovelpreventivestrategies
AT rigolmontserrat appraisalofsystemicinflammationanddiagnosticmarkersinaporcinemodelofvapsecondaryanalysisfromastudyonnovelpreventivestrategies
AT fernandezlaia appraisalofsystemicinflammationanddiagnosticmarkersinaporcinemodelofvapsecondaryanalysisfromastudyonnovelpreventivestrategies
AT meliandrea appraisalofsystemicinflammationanddiagnosticmarkersinaporcinemodelofvapsecondaryanalysisfromastudyonnovelpreventivestrategies
AT battaglinidenise appraisalofsystemicinflammationanddiagnosticmarkersinaporcinemodelofvapsecondaryanalysisfromastudyonnovelpreventivestrategies
AT luquenestor appraisalofsystemicinflammationanddiagnosticmarkersinaporcinemodelofvapsecondaryanalysisfromastudyonnovelpreventivestrategies
AT ferrermiguel appraisalofsystemicinflammationanddiagnosticmarkersinaporcinemodelofvapsecondaryanalysisfromastudyonnovelpreventivestrategies
AT martinloechesignacio appraisalofsystemicinflammationanddiagnosticmarkersinaporcinemodelofvapsecondaryanalysisfromastudyonnovelpreventivestrategies
AT povoapedro appraisalofsystemicinflammationanddiagnosticmarkersinaporcinemodelofvapsecondaryanalysisfromastudyonnovelpreventivestrategies
AT chiumellodavide appraisalofsystemicinflammationanddiagnosticmarkersinaporcinemodelofvapsecondaryanalysisfromastudyonnovelpreventivestrategies
AT pelosipaolo appraisalofsystemicinflammationanddiagnosticmarkersinaporcinemodelofvapsecondaryanalysisfromastudyonnovelpreventivestrategies
AT torresantoni appraisalofsystemicinflammationanddiagnosticmarkersinaporcinemodelofvapsecondaryanalysisfromastudyonnovelpreventivestrategies