Cargando…
Benchmark Dose Modeling of In Vitro Genotoxicity Data: a Reanalysis
The methods of applied genetic toxicology are changing from qualitative hazard identification to quantitative risk assessment. Recently, quantitative analysis with point of departure (PoD) metrics and benchmark dose (BMD) modeling have been applied to in vitro genotoxicity data. Two software package...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Society of Toxicology
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6195882/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30370005 http://dx.doi.org/10.5487/TR.2018.34.4.303 |
_version_ | 1783364467689521152 |
---|---|
author | Guo, Xiaoqing Mei, Nan |
author_facet | Guo, Xiaoqing Mei, Nan |
author_sort | Guo, Xiaoqing |
collection | PubMed |
description | The methods of applied genetic toxicology are changing from qualitative hazard identification to quantitative risk assessment. Recently, quantitative analysis with point of departure (PoD) metrics and benchmark dose (BMD) modeling have been applied to in vitro genotoxicity data. Two software packages are commonly used for BMD analysis. In previous studies, we performed quantitative dose-response analysis by using the PROAST software to quantitatively evaluate the mutagenicity of four piperidine nitroxides with various substituent groups on the 4-position of the piperidine ring and six cigarette whole smoke solutions (WSSs) prepared by bubbling machine-generated whole smoke. In the present study, we reanalyzed the obtained genotoxicity data by using the EPA’s BMD software (BMDS) to evaluate the inter-platform quantitative agreement of the estimates of genotoxic potency. We calculated the BMDs for 10%, 50%, and 100% (i.e., a two-fold increase), and 200% increases over the concurrent vehicle controls to achieve better discrimination of the dose-responses, along with their BMDLs (the lower 95% confidence interval of the BMD) and BMDUs (the upper 95% confidence interval of the BMD). The BMD values and rankings estimated in this study by using the EPA’s BMDS were reasonably similar to those calculated in our previous studies by using PROAST. These results indicated that both software packages were suitable for dose-response analysis using the mouse lymphoma assay and that the BMD modeling results from these software packages produced comparable rank orders of the mutagenic potency. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6195882 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Korean Society of Toxicology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61958822018-10-26 Benchmark Dose Modeling of In Vitro Genotoxicity Data: a Reanalysis Guo, Xiaoqing Mei, Nan Toxicol Res Invited Review The methods of applied genetic toxicology are changing from qualitative hazard identification to quantitative risk assessment. Recently, quantitative analysis with point of departure (PoD) metrics and benchmark dose (BMD) modeling have been applied to in vitro genotoxicity data. Two software packages are commonly used for BMD analysis. In previous studies, we performed quantitative dose-response analysis by using the PROAST software to quantitatively evaluate the mutagenicity of four piperidine nitroxides with various substituent groups on the 4-position of the piperidine ring and six cigarette whole smoke solutions (WSSs) prepared by bubbling machine-generated whole smoke. In the present study, we reanalyzed the obtained genotoxicity data by using the EPA’s BMD software (BMDS) to evaluate the inter-platform quantitative agreement of the estimates of genotoxic potency. We calculated the BMDs for 10%, 50%, and 100% (i.e., a two-fold increase), and 200% increases over the concurrent vehicle controls to achieve better discrimination of the dose-responses, along with their BMDLs (the lower 95% confidence interval of the BMD) and BMDUs (the upper 95% confidence interval of the BMD). The BMD values and rankings estimated in this study by using the EPA’s BMDS were reasonably similar to those calculated in our previous studies by using PROAST. These results indicated that both software packages were suitable for dose-response analysis using the mouse lymphoma assay and that the BMD modeling results from these software packages produced comparable rank orders of the mutagenic potency. Korean Society of Toxicology 2018-10 2018-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6195882/ /pubmed/30370005 http://dx.doi.org/10.5487/TR.2018.34.4.303 Text en Copyright © 2018 The Korean Society Of Toxicology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Invited Review Guo, Xiaoqing Mei, Nan Benchmark Dose Modeling of In Vitro Genotoxicity Data: a Reanalysis |
title | Benchmark Dose Modeling of In Vitro Genotoxicity Data: a Reanalysis |
title_full | Benchmark Dose Modeling of In Vitro Genotoxicity Data: a Reanalysis |
title_fullStr | Benchmark Dose Modeling of In Vitro Genotoxicity Data: a Reanalysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Benchmark Dose Modeling of In Vitro Genotoxicity Data: a Reanalysis |
title_short | Benchmark Dose Modeling of In Vitro Genotoxicity Data: a Reanalysis |
title_sort | benchmark dose modeling of in vitro genotoxicity data: a reanalysis |
topic | Invited Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6195882/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30370005 http://dx.doi.org/10.5487/TR.2018.34.4.303 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guoxiaoqing benchmarkdosemodelingofinvitrogenotoxicitydataareanalysis AT meinan benchmarkdosemodelingofinvitrogenotoxicitydataareanalysis |