Cargando…

Benchmark Dose Modeling of In Vitro Genotoxicity Data: a Reanalysis

The methods of applied genetic toxicology are changing from qualitative hazard identification to quantitative risk assessment. Recently, quantitative analysis with point of departure (PoD) metrics and benchmark dose (BMD) modeling have been applied to in vitro genotoxicity data. Two software package...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guo, Xiaoqing, Mei, Nan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Toxicology 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6195882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30370005
http://dx.doi.org/10.5487/TR.2018.34.4.303
_version_ 1783364467689521152
author Guo, Xiaoqing
Mei, Nan
author_facet Guo, Xiaoqing
Mei, Nan
author_sort Guo, Xiaoqing
collection PubMed
description The methods of applied genetic toxicology are changing from qualitative hazard identification to quantitative risk assessment. Recently, quantitative analysis with point of departure (PoD) metrics and benchmark dose (BMD) modeling have been applied to in vitro genotoxicity data. Two software packages are commonly used for BMD analysis. In previous studies, we performed quantitative dose-response analysis by using the PROAST software to quantitatively evaluate the mutagenicity of four piperidine nitroxides with various substituent groups on the 4-position of the piperidine ring and six cigarette whole smoke solutions (WSSs) prepared by bubbling machine-generated whole smoke. In the present study, we reanalyzed the obtained genotoxicity data by using the EPA’s BMD software (BMDS) to evaluate the inter-platform quantitative agreement of the estimates of genotoxic potency. We calculated the BMDs for 10%, 50%, and 100% (i.e., a two-fold increase), and 200% increases over the concurrent vehicle controls to achieve better discrimination of the dose-responses, along with their BMDLs (the lower 95% confidence interval of the BMD) and BMDUs (the upper 95% confidence interval of the BMD). The BMD values and rankings estimated in this study by using the EPA’s BMDS were reasonably similar to those calculated in our previous studies by using PROAST. These results indicated that both software packages were suitable for dose-response analysis using the mouse lymphoma assay and that the BMD modeling results from these software packages produced comparable rank orders of the mutagenic potency.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6195882
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Korean Society of Toxicology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61958822018-10-26 Benchmark Dose Modeling of In Vitro Genotoxicity Data: a Reanalysis Guo, Xiaoqing Mei, Nan Toxicol Res Invited Review The methods of applied genetic toxicology are changing from qualitative hazard identification to quantitative risk assessment. Recently, quantitative analysis with point of departure (PoD) metrics and benchmark dose (BMD) modeling have been applied to in vitro genotoxicity data. Two software packages are commonly used for BMD analysis. In previous studies, we performed quantitative dose-response analysis by using the PROAST software to quantitatively evaluate the mutagenicity of four piperidine nitroxides with various substituent groups on the 4-position of the piperidine ring and six cigarette whole smoke solutions (WSSs) prepared by bubbling machine-generated whole smoke. In the present study, we reanalyzed the obtained genotoxicity data by using the EPA’s BMD software (BMDS) to evaluate the inter-platform quantitative agreement of the estimates of genotoxic potency. We calculated the BMDs for 10%, 50%, and 100% (i.e., a two-fold increase), and 200% increases over the concurrent vehicle controls to achieve better discrimination of the dose-responses, along with their BMDLs (the lower 95% confidence interval of the BMD) and BMDUs (the upper 95% confidence interval of the BMD). The BMD values and rankings estimated in this study by using the EPA’s BMDS were reasonably similar to those calculated in our previous studies by using PROAST. These results indicated that both software packages were suitable for dose-response analysis using the mouse lymphoma assay and that the BMD modeling results from these software packages produced comparable rank orders of the mutagenic potency. Korean Society of Toxicology 2018-10 2018-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6195882/ /pubmed/30370005 http://dx.doi.org/10.5487/TR.2018.34.4.303 Text en Copyright © 2018 The Korean Society Of Toxicology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Invited Review
Guo, Xiaoqing
Mei, Nan
Benchmark Dose Modeling of In Vitro Genotoxicity Data: a Reanalysis
title Benchmark Dose Modeling of In Vitro Genotoxicity Data: a Reanalysis
title_full Benchmark Dose Modeling of In Vitro Genotoxicity Data: a Reanalysis
title_fullStr Benchmark Dose Modeling of In Vitro Genotoxicity Data: a Reanalysis
title_full_unstemmed Benchmark Dose Modeling of In Vitro Genotoxicity Data: a Reanalysis
title_short Benchmark Dose Modeling of In Vitro Genotoxicity Data: a Reanalysis
title_sort benchmark dose modeling of in vitro genotoxicity data: a reanalysis
topic Invited Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6195882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30370005
http://dx.doi.org/10.5487/TR.2018.34.4.303
work_keys_str_mv AT guoxiaoqing benchmarkdosemodelingofinvitrogenotoxicitydataareanalysis
AT meinan benchmarkdosemodelingofinvitrogenotoxicitydataareanalysis