Cargando…
Impact of transvenous cardiac implantable electronic devices in chronic hemodialysis patients: a single-center, observational comparative study
BACKGROUND: We investigated the impact of a transvenous cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) placement on outcomes and arteriovenous vascular access (VA) patency among chronic hemodialysis patients. METHODS: This is a single-center, observational comparative study between chronic hemodialysi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6195973/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30342493 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-018-1095-y |
_version_ | 1783364487438401536 |
---|---|
author | Jeong, Seonjeong Nam, Gi Byoung Chang, Jai Won Kim, Min-Ju Han, Youngjin Kwon, Tae-Won Cho, Yong-Pil |
author_facet | Jeong, Seonjeong Nam, Gi Byoung Chang, Jai Won Kim, Min-Ju Han, Youngjin Kwon, Tae-Won Cho, Yong-Pil |
author_sort | Jeong, Seonjeong |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: We investigated the impact of a transvenous cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) placement on outcomes and arteriovenous vascular access (VA) patency among chronic hemodialysis patients. METHODS: This is a single-center, observational comparative study between chronic hemodialysis patients with ipsilateral and contralateral CIED and VA. Forty-two consecutive patients who underwent both CIED placement and upper-extremity VA for hemodialysis, regardless of the sequence and time interval between these 2 procedures, were identified between January 2001 and December 2017. Patients with ipsilateral (n = 22, 52%, the ipsilateral group) and contralateral (n = 20, 48%, the contralateral group) CIED and VA were compared retrospectively; the primary outcome was any-cause mortality and cardiac mortality or the composite of any systemic complications, defined as central venous stenosis or occlusion, any device infections or tricuspid regurgitation; the secondary outcome was CIED or VA malfunction. RESULTS: During the median follow-up period of 101 months, primary outcome incidence was significantly higher in the ipsilateral group than the contralateral group (73% vs 40%, P = 0.03), although the incidences of any-cause mortality (P = 0.28) and cardiac mortality (P > 0.99) were similar between the groups. Secondary outcome incidence did not differ significantly between the 2 groups (55% vs 30%, P = 0.36). Kaplan–Meier survival analysis revealed similar primary and secondary VA patency rates in both groups. On subgroup analysis, patients with upper arm VA had similar primary and secondary patency to those with forearm VA. CONCLUSIONS: Despite some notable limitations of the study, the retrospective study design and small sample size, we found that the any-cause mortality incidence and VA patency did not differ between the 2 groups, but primary outcome incidence was significantly higher among patients with ipsilateral CIED and VA. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6195973 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61959732018-10-30 Impact of transvenous cardiac implantable electronic devices in chronic hemodialysis patients: a single-center, observational comparative study Jeong, Seonjeong Nam, Gi Byoung Chang, Jai Won Kim, Min-Ju Han, Youngjin Kwon, Tae-Won Cho, Yong-Pil BMC Nephrol Research Article BACKGROUND: We investigated the impact of a transvenous cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) placement on outcomes and arteriovenous vascular access (VA) patency among chronic hemodialysis patients. METHODS: This is a single-center, observational comparative study between chronic hemodialysis patients with ipsilateral and contralateral CIED and VA. Forty-two consecutive patients who underwent both CIED placement and upper-extremity VA for hemodialysis, regardless of the sequence and time interval between these 2 procedures, were identified between January 2001 and December 2017. Patients with ipsilateral (n = 22, 52%, the ipsilateral group) and contralateral (n = 20, 48%, the contralateral group) CIED and VA were compared retrospectively; the primary outcome was any-cause mortality and cardiac mortality or the composite of any systemic complications, defined as central venous stenosis or occlusion, any device infections or tricuspid regurgitation; the secondary outcome was CIED or VA malfunction. RESULTS: During the median follow-up period of 101 months, primary outcome incidence was significantly higher in the ipsilateral group than the contralateral group (73% vs 40%, P = 0.03), although the incidences of any-cause mortality (P = 0.28) and cardiac mortality (P > 0.99) were similar between the groups. Secondary outcome incidence did not differ significantly between the 2 groups (55% vs 30%, P = 0.36). Kaplan–Meier survival analysis revealed similar primary and secondary VA patency rates in both groups. On subgroup analysis, patients with upper arm VA had similar primary and secondary patency to those with forearm VA. CONCLUSIONS: Despite some notable limitations of the study, the retrospective study design and small sample size, we found that the any-cause mortality incidence and VA patency did not differ between the 2 groups, but primary outcome incidence was significantly higher among patients with ipsilateral CIED and VA. BioMed Central 2018-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6195973/ /pubmed/30342493 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-018-1095-y Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Jeong, Seonjeong Nam, Gi Byoung Chang, Jai Won Kim, Min-Ju Han, Youngjin Kwon, Tae-Won Cho, Yong-Pil Impact of transvenous cardiac implantable electronic devices in chronic hemodialysis patients: a single-center, observational comparative study |
title | Impact of transvenous cardiac implantable electronic devices in chronic hemodialysis patients: a single-center, observational comparative study |
title_full | Impact of transvenous cardiac implantable electronic devices in chronic hemodialysis patients: a single-center, observational comparative study |
title_fullStr | Impact of transvenous cardiac implantable electronic devices in chronic hemodialysis patients: a single-center, observational comparative study |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of transvenous cardiac implantable electronic devices in chronic hemodialysis patients: a single-center, observational comparative study |
title_short | Impact of transvenous cardiac implantable electronic devices in chronic hemodialysis patients: a single-center, observational comparative study |
title_sort | impact of transvenous cardiac implantable electronic devices in chronic hemodialysis patients: a single-center, observational comparative study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6195973/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30342493 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-018-1095-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jeongseonjeong impactoftransvenouscardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesinchronichemodialysispatientsasinglecenterobservationalcomparativestudy AT namgibyoung impactoftransvenouscardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesinchronichemodialysispatientsasinglecenterobservationalcomparativestudy AT changjaiwon impactoftransvenouscardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesinchronichemodialysispatientsasinglecenterobservationalcomparativestudy AT kimminju impactoftransvenouscardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesinchronichemodialysispatientsasinglecenterobservationalcomparativestudy AT hanyoungjin impactoftransvenouscardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesinchronichemodialysispatientsasinglecenterobservationalcomparativestudy AT kwontaewon impactoftransvenouscardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesinchronichemodialysispatientsasinglecenterobservationalcomparativestudy AT choyongpil impactoftransvenouscardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesinchronichemodialysispatientsasinglecenterobservationalcomparativestudy |