Cargando…

Impact of transvenous cardiac implantable electronic devices in chronic hemodialysis patients: a single-center, observational comparative study

BACKGROUND: We investigated the impact of a transvenous cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) placement on outcomes and arteriovenous vascular access (VA) patency among chronic hemodialysis patients. METHODS: This is a single-center, observational comparative study between chronic hemodialysi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jeong, Seonjeong, Nam, Gi Byoung, Chang, Jai Won, Kim, Min-Ju, Han, Youngjin, Kwon, Tae-Won, Cho, Yong-Pil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6195973/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30342493
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-018-1095-y
_version_ 1783364487438401536
author Jeong, Seonjeong
Nam, Gi Byoung
Chang, Jai Won
Kim, Min-Ju
Han, Youngjin
Kwon, Tae-Won
Cho, Yong-Pil
author_facet Jeong, Seonjeong
Nam, Gi Byoung
Chang, Jai Won
Kim, Min-Ju
Han, Youngjin
Kwon, Tae-Won
Cho, Yong-Pil
author_sort Jeong, Seonjeong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We investigated the impact of a transvenous cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) placement on outcomes and arteriovenous vascular access (VA) patency among chronic hemodialysis patients. METHODS: This is a single-center, observational comparative study between chronic hemodialysis patients with ipsilateral and contralateral CIED and VA. Forty-two consecutive patients who underwent both CIED placement and upper-extremity VA for hemodialysis, regardless of the sequence and time interval between these 2 procedures, were identified between January 2001 and December 2017. Patients with ipsilateral (n = 22, 52%, the ipsilateral group) and contralateral (n = 20, 48%, the contralateral group) CIED and VA were compared retrospectively; the primary outcome was any-cause mortality and cardiac mortality or the composite of any systemic complications, defined as central venous stenosis or occlusion, any device infections or tricuspid regurgitation; the secondary outcome was CIED or VA malfunction. RESULTS: During the median follow-up period of 101 months, primary outcome incidence was significantly higher in the ipsilateral group than the contralateral group (73% vs 40%, P = 0.03), although the incidences of any-cause mortality (P = 0.28) and cardiac mortality (P > 0.99) were similar between the groups. Secondary outcome incidence did not differ significantly between the 2 groups (55% vs 30%, P = 0.36). Kaplan–Meier survival analysis revealed similar primary and secondary VA patency rates in both groups. On subgroup analysis, patients with upper arm VA had similar primary and secondary patency to those with forearm VA. CONCLUSIONS: Despite some notable limitations of the study, the retrospective study design and small sample size, we found that the any-cause mortality incidence and VA patency did not differ between the 2 groups, but primary outcome incidence was significantly higher among patients with ipsilateral CIED and VA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6195973
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61959732018-10-30 Impact of transvenous cardiac implantable electronic devices in chronic hemodialysis patients: a single-center, observational comparative study Jeong, Seonjeong Nam, Gi Byoung Chang, Jai Won Kim, Min-Ju Han, Youngjin Kwon, Tae-Won Cho, Yong-Pil BMC Nephrol Research Article BACKGROUND: We investigated the impact of a transvenous cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) placement on outcomes and arteriovenous vascular access (VA) patency among chronic hemodialysis patients. METHODS: This is a single-center, observational comparative study between chronic hemodialysis patients with ipsilateral and contralateral CIED and VA. Forty-two consecutive patients who underwent both CIED placement and upper-extremity VA for hemodialysis, regardless of the sequence and time interval between these 2 procedures, were identified between January 2001 and December 2017. Patients with ipsilateral (n = 22, 52%, the ipsilateral group) and contralateral (n = 20, 48%, the contralateral group) CIED and VA were compared retrospectively; the primary outcome was any-cause mortality and cardiac mortality or the composite of any systemic complications, defined as central venous stenosis or occlusion, any device infections or tricuspid regurgitation; the secondary outcome was CIED or VA malfunction. RESULTS: During the median follow-up period of 101 months, primary outcome incidence was significantly higher in the ipsilateral group than the contralateral group (73% vs 40%, P = 0.03), although the incidences of any-cause mortality (P = 0.28) and cardiac mortality (P > 0.99) were similar between the groups. Secondary outcome incidence did not differ significantly between the 2 groups (55% vs 30%, P = 0.36). Kaplan–Meier survival analysis revealed similar primary and secondary VA patency rates in both groups. On subgroup analysis, patients with upper arm VA had similar primary and secondary patency to those with forearm VA. CONCLUSIONS: Despite some notable limitations of the study, the retrospective study design and small sample size, we found that the any-cause mortality incidence and VA patency did not differ between the 2 groups, but primary outcome incidence was significantly higher among patients with ipsilateral CIED and VA. BioMed Central 2018-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6195973/ /pubmed/30342493 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-018-1095-y Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Jeong, Seonjeong
Nam, Gi Byoung
Chang, Jai Won
Kim, Min-Ju
Han, Youngjin
Kwon, Tae-Won
Cho, Yong-Pil
Impact of transvenous cardiac implantable electronic devices in chronic hemodialysis patients: a single-center, observational comparative study
title Impact of transvenous cardiac implantable electronic devices in chronic hemodialysis patients: a single-center, observational comparative study
title_full Impact of transvenous cardiac implantable electronic devices in chronic hemodialysis patients: a single-center, observational comparative study
title_fullStr Impact of transvenous cardiac implantable electronic devices in chronic hemodialysis patients: a single-center, observational comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Impact of transvenous cardiac implantable electronic devices in chronic hemodialysis patients: a single-center, observational comparative study
title_short Impact of transvenous cardiac implantable electronic devices in chronic hemodialysis patients: a single-center, observational comparative study
title_sort impact of transvenous cardiac implantable electronic devices in chronic hemodialysis patients: a single-center, observational comparative study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6195973/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30342493
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-018-1095-y
work_keys_str_mv AT jeongseonjeong impactoftransvenouscardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesinchronichemodialysispatientsasinglecenterobservationalcomparativestudy
AT namgibyoung impactoftransvenouscardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesinchronichemodialysispatientsasinglecenterobservationalcomparativestudy
AT changjaiwon impactoftransvenouscardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesinchronichemodialysispatientsasinglecenterobservationalcomparativestudy
AT kimminju impactoftransvenouscardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesinchronichemodialysispatientsasinglecenterobservationalcomparativestudy
AT hanyoungjin impactoftransvenouscardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesinchronichemodialysispatientsasinglecenterobservationalcomparativestudy
AT kwontaewon impactoftransvenouscardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesinchronichemodialysispatientsasinglecenterobservationalcomparativestudy
AT choyongpil impactoftransvenouscardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesinchronichemodialysispatientsasinglecenterobservationalcomparativestudy