Cargando…

“It’s a precious gift, not to waste”: is routine cross matching necessary in orthopedics surgery? Retrospective study of 699 patients in 9 different procedures

BACKGROUND: Orthopedic surgeries are usually associated with excessive blood loss which leads surgeons to overestimate need for blood transfusions and over ordering of blood. The cross matched blood, when not used, leads to the wastage of blood bank resources in terms of time, money and manpower. Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hasan, Obada, Khan, Eraj Khurshid, Ali, Moiz, Sheikh, Sadaf, Fatima, Anam, Rashid, Haroon U.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6195984/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30342517
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3613-9
_version_ 1783364490100736000
author Hasan, Obada
Khan, Eraj Khurshid
Ali, Moiz
Sheikh, Sadaf
Fatima, Anam
Rashid, Haroon U.
author_facet Hasan, Obada
Khan, Eraj Khurshid
Ali, Moiz
Sheikh, Sadaf
Fatima, Anam
Rashid, Haroon U.
author_sort Hasan, Obada
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Orthopedic surgeries are usually associated with excessive blood loss which leads surgeons to overestimate need for blood transfusions and over ordering of blood. The cross matched blood, when not used, leads to the wastage of blood bank resources in terms of time, money and manpower. The objective of this study was to investigate the compliance to previously proposed MSBOS and to provide updated recommendations for all orthopedic procedures. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted between 1st June 2015 and 31st May 2016. Patients admitted to the orthopedic surgery service for whom blood products were requested were included. Cross Match/Transfusion (CT) Ratio, Transfusion Index and Transfusion Probability were calculated. Values of < 2.5, > 0.5 and > 30% respectively, were taken as standards. Maximum Surgical Blood Ordering Schedule (MSBOS) was proposed based upon these calculations using Mead’s criteria. RESULTS: Six hundred and ninety-nine patients were sampled after implementing exclusion criteria. The overall CT ratio was 4.87, transfusion index was 0.55 and transfusion probability was 25%. A compliance rate of 24.6% was observed with the reference CT ratio of 2.5. Highest CT ratio was calculated for arthroscopic procedures while tumor resection had the lowest ratio. Age, procedure performed, ASA status and use of tourniquet were found to be significantly associated with CT ratio being greater or less than 2.5. CONCLUSION: Results showed significant wastage of blood products and non-compliance with blood ordering guidelines. Hence there is need for large scale prospective studies to establish MSBOS and ensure its compliance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6195984
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61959842018-10-30 “It’s a precious gift, not to waste”: is routine cross matching necessary in orthopedics surgery? Retrospective study of 699 patients in 9 different procedures Hasan, Obada Khan, Eraj Khurshid Ali, Moiz Sheikh, Sadaf Fatima, Anam Rashid, Haroon U. BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Orthopedic surgeries are usually associated with excessive blood loss which leads surgeons to overestimate need for blood transfusions and over ordering of blood. The cross matched blood, when not used, leads to the wastage of blood bank resources in terms of time, money and manpower. The objective of this study was to investigate the compliance to previously proposed MSBOS and to provide updated recommendations for all orthopedic procedures. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted between 1st June 2015 and 31st May 2016. Patients admitted to the orthopedic surgery service for whom blood products were requested were included. Cross Match/Transfusion (CT) Ratio, Transfusion Index and Transfusion Probability were calculated. Values of < 2.5, > 0.5 and > 30% respectively, were taken as standards. Maximum Surgical Blood Ordering Schedule (MSBOS) was proposed based upon these calculations using Mead’s criteria. RESULTS: Six hundred and ninety-nine patients were sampled after implementing exclusion criteria. The overall CT ratio was 4.87, transfusion index was 0.55 and transfusion probability was 25%. A compliance rate of 24.6% was observed with the reference CT ratio of 2.5. Highest CT ratio was calculated for arthroscopic procedures while tumor resection had the lowest ratio. Age, procedure performed, ASA status and use of tourniquet were found to be significantly associated with CT ratio being greater or less than 2.5. CONCLUSION: Results showed significant wastage of blood products and non-compliance with blood ordering guidelines. Hence there is need for large scale prospective studies to establish MSBOS and ensure its compliance. BioMed Central 2018-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6195984/ /pubmed/30342517 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3613-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hasan, Obada
Khan, Eraj Khurshid
Ali, Moiz
Sheikh, Sadaf
Fatima, Anam
Rashid, Haroon U.
“It’s a precious gift, not to waste”: is routine cross matching necessary in orthopedics surgery? Retrospective study of 699 patients in 9 different procedures
title “It’s a precious gift, not to waste”: is routine cross matching necessary in orthopedics surgery? Retrospective study of 699 patients in 9 different procedures
title_full “It’s a precious gift, not to waste”: is routine cross matching necessary in orthopedics surgery? Retrospective study of 699 patients in 9 different procedures
title_fullStr “It’s a precious gift, not to waste”: is routine cross matching necessary in orthopedics surgery? Retrospective study of 699 patients in 9 different procedures
title_full_unstemmed “It’s a precious gift, not to waste”: is routine cross matching necessary in orthopedics surgery? Retrospective study of 699 patients in 9 different procedures
title_short “It’s a precious gift, not to waste”: is routine cross matching necessary in orthopedics surgery? Retrospective study of 699 patients in 9 different procedures
title_sort “it’s a precious gift, not to waste”: is routine cross matching necessary in orthopedics surgery? retrospective study of 699 patients in 9 different procedures
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6195984/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30342517
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3613-9
work_keys_str_mv AT hasanobada itsapreciousgiftnottowasteisroutinecrossmatchingnecessaryinorthopedicssurgeryretrospectivestudyof699patientsin9differentprocedures
AT khanerajkhurshid itsapreciousgiftnottowasteisroutinecrossmatchingnecessaryinorthopedicssurgeryretrospectivestudyof699patientsin9differentprocedures
AT alimoiz itsapreciousgiftnottowasteisroutinecrossmatchingnecessaryinorthopedicssurgeryretrospectivestudyof699patientsin9differentprocedures
AT sheikhsadaf itsapreciousgiftnottowasteisroutinecrossmatchingnecessaryinorthopedicssurgeryretrospectivestudyof699patientsin9differentprocedures
AT fatimaanam itsapreciousgiftnottowasteisroutinecrossmatchingnecessaryinorthopedicssurgeryretrospectivestudyof699patientsin9differentprocedures
AT rashidharoonu itsapreciousgiftnottowasteisroutinecrossmatchingnecessaryinorthopedicssurgeryretrospectivestudyof699patientsin9differentprocedures