Cargando…

Molecular viability testing of viable but non‐culturable bacteria induced by antibiotic exposure

Nucleic acid amplification‐based methods are limited by their inability to discriminate between viable and dead cells. To overcome this drawback, propidium monoazide (PMA) combined with qPCR has been used to differentiate viable from nonviable cells in environmental samples. However, assessing bacte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Seunguk, Bae, Sungwoo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6196391/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29243404
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.13039
_version_ 1783364547343548416
author Lee, Seunguk
Bae, Sungwoo
author_facet Lee, Seunguk
Bae, Sungwoo
author_sort Lee, Seunguk
collection PubMed
description Nucleic acid amplification‐based methods are limited by their inability to discriminate between viable and dead cells. To overcome this drawback, propidium monoazide (PMA) combined with qPCR has been used to differentiate viable from nonviable cells in environmental samples. However, assessing bacterial physiology using PMA‐qPCR remains a challenge due to its incapability of detecting metabolic activities, leading to overestimation of the viable bacteria population under an inactivation condition (e.g. antibiotic treatments). A recent advanced technique to amplify ribosomal RNA precursors (pre‐rRNA) has been shown to detect viable cells because pre‐rRNAs are intermediates in rRNA synthesis. This study investigated the effect of different types of antibiotics on the bacterial viability or viable but non‐culturable (VBNC) state using both PMA‐qPCR and pre‐rRNA analyses with Pseudomonas aeruginosa. This study demonstrated that P. aeruginosa was more sensitive to colistin than it was to carbenicillin, gentamicin and levofloxacin. We could discriminate VBNC P. aeruginosa cells using PMA‐qPCR when antibiotic pressure induced the VBNC state. Also, pre‐rRNA was able to distinguish viable cells from colistin‐inactivated bacteria cells, and it could detect the presence of VBNC and persister cells. Our results showed that these two molecular methods could successfully eliminate false‐positive signals derived from antibiotics‐inactivated cells.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6196391
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61963912018-10-30 Molecular viability testing of viable but non‐culturable bacteria induced by antibiotic exposure Lee, Seunguk Bae, Sungwoo Microb Biotechnol Research Articles Nucleic acid amplification‐based methods are limited by their inability to discriminate between viable and dead cells. To overcome this drawback, propidium monoazide (PMA) combined with qPCR has been used to differentiate viable from nonviable cells in environmental samples. However, assessing bacterial physiology using PMA‐qPCR remains a challenge due to its incapability of detecting metabolic activities, leading to overestimation of the viable bacteria population under an inactivation condition (e.g. antibiotic treatments). A recent advanced technique to amplify ribosomal RNA precursors (pre‐rRNA) has been shown to detect viable cells because pre‐rRNAs are intermediates in rRNA synthesis. This study investigated the effect of different types of antibiotics on the bacterial viability or viable but non‐culturable (VBNC) state using both PMA‐qPCR and pre‐rRNA analyses with Pseudomonas aeruginosa. This study demonstrated that P. aeruginosa was more sensitive to colistin than it was to carbenicillin, gentamicin and levofloxacin. We could discriminate VBNC P. aeruginosa cells using PMA‐qPCR when antibiotic pressure induced the VBNC state. Also, pre‐rRNA was able to distinguish viable cells from colistin‐inactivated bacteria cells, and it could detect the presence of VBNC and persister cells. Our results showed that these two molecular methods could successfully eliminate false‐positive signals derived from antibiotics‐inactivated cells. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6196391/ /pubmed/29243404 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.13039 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Microbial Biotechnology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd and Society for Applied Microbiology. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Lee, Seunguk
Bae, Sungwoo
Molecular viability testing of viable but non‐culturable bacteria induced by antibiotic exposure
title Molecular viability testing of viable but non‐culturable bacteria induced by antibiotic exposure
title_full Molecular viability testing of viable but non‐culturable bacteria induced by antibiotic exposure
title_fullStr Molecular viability testing of viable but non‐culturable bacteria induced by antibiotic exposure
title_full_unstemmed Molecular viability testing of viable but non‐culturable bacteria induced by antibiotic exposure
title_short Molecular viability testing of viable but non‐culturable bacteria induced by antibiotic exposure
title_sort molecular viability testing of viable but non‐culturable bacteria induced by antibiotic exposure
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6196391/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29243404
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.13039
work_keys_str_mv AT leeseunguk molecularviabilitytestingofviablebutnonculturablebacteriainducedbyantibioticexposure
AT baesungwoo molecularviabilitytestingofviablebutnonculturablebacteriainducedbyantibioticexposure