Cargando…

A methodological approach for deep learning to distinguish between meningiomas and gliomas on canine MR-images

BACKGROUND: Distinguishing between meningeal-based and intra-axial lesions by means of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging findings may occasionally be challenging. Meningiomas and gliomas account for most of the total primary brain neoplasms in dogs, and differentiating between these two forms is manda...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Banzato, Tommaso, Bernardini, Marco, Cherubini, Giunio B., Zotti, Alessandro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6196418/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30348148
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-018-1638-2
_version_ 1783364553707356160
author Banzato, Tommaso
Bernardini, Marco
Cherubini, Giunio B.
Zotti, Alessandro
author_facet Banzato, Tommaso
Bernardini, Marco
Cherubini, Giunio B.
Zotti, Alessandro
author_sort Banzato, Tommaso
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Distinguishing between meningeal-based and intra-axial lesions by means of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging findings may occasionally be challenging. Meningiomas and gliomas account for most of the total primary brain neoplasms in dogs, and differentiating between these two forms is mandatory in choosing the correct therapy. The aims of the present study are: 1) to determine the accuracy of a deep convolutional neural network (CNN, GoogleNet) in discriminating between meningiomas and gliomas in pre- and post-contrast T1 images and T2 images; 2) to develop an image classifier, based on the combination of CNN and MRI sequence displaying the highest accuracy, to predict whether a lesion is a meningioma or a glioma. RESULTS: Eighty cases with a final diagnosis of meningioma (n = 56) and glioma (n = 24) from two different institutions were included in the study. A pre-trained CNN was retrained on our data through a process called transfer learning. To evaluate CNN accuracy in the different imaging sequences, the dataset was divided into a training, a validation and a test set. The accuracy of the CNN was calculated on the test set. The combination between post-contrast T1 images and CNN was chosen in developing the image classifier (trCNN). Ten images from challenging cases were excluded from the database in order to test trCNN accuracy; the trCNN was trained on the remainder of the dataset of post-contrast T1 images, and correctly classified all the selected images. To compensate for the imbalance between meningiomas and gliomas in the dataset, the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) was also calculated. The trCNN showed an accuracy of 94% (MCC = 0.88) on post-contrast T1 images, 91% (MCC = 0.81) on pre-contrast T1-images and 90% (MCC = 0.8) on T2 images. CONCLUSIONS: The developed trCNN could be a reliable tool in distinguishing between different meningiomas and gliomas from MR images.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6196418
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61964182018-10-30 A methodological approach for deep learning to distinguish between meningiomas and gliomas on canine MR-images Banzato, Tommaso Bernardini, Marco Cherubini, Giunio B. Zotti, Alessandro BMC Vet Res Methodology Article BACKGROUND: Distinguishing between meningeal-based and intra-axial lesions by means of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging findings may occasionally be challenging. Meningiomas and gliomas account for most of the total primary brain neoplasms in dogs, and differentiating between these two forms is mandatory in choosing the correct therapy. The aims of the present study are: 1) to determine the accuracy of a deep convolutional neural network (CNN, GoogleNet) in discriminating between meningiomas and gliomas in pre- and post-contrast T1 images and T2 images; 2) to develop an image classifier, based on the combination of CNN and MRI sequence displaying the highest accuracy, to predict whether a lesion is a meningioma or a glioma. RESULTS: Eighty cases with a final diagnosis of meningioma (n = 56) and glioma (n = 24) from two different institutions were included in the study. A pre-trained CNN was retrained on our data through a process called transfer learning. To evaluate CNN accuracy in the different imaging sequences, the dataset was divided into a training, a validation and a test set. The accuracy of the CNN was calculated on the test set. The combination between post-contrast T1 images and CNN was chosen in developing the image classifier (trCNN). Ten images from challenging cases were excluded from the database in order to test trCNN accuracy; the trCNN was trained on the remainder of the dataset of post-contrast T1 images, and correctly classified all the selected images. To compensate for the imbalance between meningiomas and gliomas in the dataset, the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) was also calculated. The trCNN showed an accuracy of 94% (MCC = 0.88) on post-contrast T1 images, 91% (MCC = 0.81) on pre-contrast T1-images and 90% (MCC = 0.8) on T2 images. CONCLUSIONS: The developed trCNN could be a reliable tool in distinguishing between different meningiomas and gliomas from MR images. BioMed Central 2018-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6196418/ /pubmed/30348148 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-018-1638-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Methodology Article
Banzato, Tommaso
Bernardini, Marco
Cherubini, Giunio B.
Zotti, Alessandro
A methodological approach for deep learning to distinguish between meningiomas and gliomas on canine MR-images
title A methodological approach for deep learning to distinguish between meningiomas and gliomas on canine MR-images
title_full A methodological approach for deep learning to distinguish between meningiomas and gliomas on canine MR-images
title_fullStr A methodological approach for deep learning to distinguish between meningiomas and gliomas on canine MR-images
title_full_unstemmed A methodological approach for deep learning to distinguish between meningiomas and gliomas on canine MR-images
title_short A methodological approach for deep learning to distinguish between meningiomas and gliomas on canine MR-images
title_sort methodological approach for deep learning to distinguish between meningiomas and gliomas on canine mr-images
topic Methodology Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6196418/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30348148
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-018-1638-2
work_keys_str_mv AT banzatotommaso amethodologicalapproachfordeeplearningtodistinguishbetweenmeningiomasandgliomasoncaninemrimages
AT bernardinimarco amethodologicalapproachfordeeplearningtodistinguishbetweenmeningiomasandgliomasoncaninemrimages
AT cherubinigiuniob amethodologicalapproachfordeeplearningtodistinguishbetweenmeningiomasandgliomasoncaninemrimages
AT zottialessandro amethodologicalapproachfordeeplearningtodistinguishbetweenmeningiomasandgliomasoncaninemrimages
AT banzatotommaso methodologicalapproachfordeeplearningtodistinguishbetweenmeningiomasandgliomasoncaninemrimages
AT bernardinimarco methodologicalapproachfordeeplearningtodistinguishbetweenmeningiomasandgliomasoncaninemrimages
AT cherubinigiuniob methodologicalapproachfordeeplearningtodistinguishbetweenmeningiomasandgliomasoncaninemrimages
AT zottialessandro methodologicalapproachfordeeplearningtodistinguishbetweenmeningiomasandgliomasoncaninemrimages