Cargando…
Safety and efficacy of nivolumab in combination with sunitinib or pazopanib in advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma: the CheckMate 016 study
BACKGROUND: Combination treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors and antiangiogenic drugs has shown encouraging preliminary antitumor activity across various tumor types including advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (aRCC). The open-label, parallel-cohort, dose-escalation, phase I CheckMa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6196426/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30348216 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40425-018-0420-0 |
_version_ | 1783364555565432832 |
---|---|
author | Amin, Asim Plimack, Elizabeth R Ernstoff, Marc S Lewis, Lionel D Bauer, Todd M McDermott, David F Carducci, Michael Kollmannsberger, Christian Rini, Brian I Heng, Daniel Y C Knox, Jennifer Voss, Martin H Spratlin, Jennifer Berghorn, Elmer Yang, Lingfeng Hammers, Hans J |
author_facet | Amin, Asim Plimack, Elizabeth R Ernstoff, Marc S Lewis, Lionel D Bauer, Todd M McDermott, David F Carducci, Michael Kollmannsberger, Christian Rini, Brian I Heng, Daniel Y C Knox, Jennifer Voss, Martin H Spratlin, Jennifer Berghorn, Elmer Yang, Lingfeng Hammers, Hans J |
author_sort | Amin, Asim |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Combination treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors and antiangiogenic drugs has shown encouraging preliminary antitumor activity across various tumor types including advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (aRCC). The open-label, parallel-cohort, dose-escalation, phase I CheckMate 016 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of nivolumab in combination with antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors or ipilimumab. Long-term outcomes from this study for the combination of nivolumab plus sunitinib or pazopanib in aRCC are presented. METHODS: Patients with aRCC received nivolumab plus either sunitinib (50 mg/day, 4 weeks on/2 weeks off; N + S) or pazopanib (800 mg/day; N + P) until progression/unacceptable toxicity. The nivolumab starting dose was 2 mg/kg every 3 weeks, with planned escalation to 5 mg/kg every 3 weeks. Primary endpoints were safety and tolerability; antitumor activity was a secondary endpoint. RESULTS: Arm N + S enrolled 33 patients, 19 of whom were treatment-naïve; this arm advanced to the expansion phase. Median follow-up was 50.0 months. Patients experienced high frequencies of adverse events (AEs) including treatment-related AEs (100%), grade 3/4 treatment-related AEs (82%), and treatment-related AEs leading to discontinuation (39%). Investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) was 55% (18/33) and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.7 months. Median overall survival (OS) was not reached. Arm N + P enrolled 20 patients, all had ≥1 prior systemic therapy; this arm was closed due to dose-limiting toxicities and did not proceed to expansion. Median follow-up was 27.1 months. Patients treated with N + P experienced high frequencies of AEs including treatment-related AEs (100%), grade 3/4 treatment-related AEs (70%), and treatment-related AEs leading to discontinuation (25%). Investigator-assessed ORR was 45% (9/20) and median PFS was 7.2 months. Median OS was 27.9 months. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of standard doses of sunitinib or pazopanib to nivolumab resulted in a high incidence of high-grade toxicities limiting future development of either combination regimen. While there was no adverse impact on response and the OS outcome was notable, the findings suggest that the success of combination regimens based on immune checkpoint inhibitors and antiangiogenic drugs may be dependent on careful selection of the antiangiogenic component and dose. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01472081. Registered 16 November 2011. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40425-018-0420-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6196426 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61964262018-10-30 Safety and efficacy of nivolumab in combination with sunitinib or pazopanib in advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma: the CheckMate 016 study Amin, Asim Plimack, Elizabeth R Ernstoff, Marc S Lewis, Lionel D Bauer, Todd M McDermott, David F Carducci, Michael Kollmannsberger, Christian Rini, Brian I Heng, Daniel Y C Knox, Jennifer Voss, Martin H Spratlin, Jennifer Berghorn, Elmer Yang, Lingfeng Hammers, Hans J J Immunother Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Combination treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors and antiangiogenic drugs has shown encouraging preliminary antitumor activity across various tumor types including advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (aRCC). The open-label, parallel-cohort, dose-escalation, phase I CheckMate 016 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of nivolumab in combination with antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors or ipilimumab. Long-term outcomes from this study for the combination of nivolumab plus sunitinib or pazopanib in aRCC are presented. METHODS: Patients with aRCC received nivolumab plus either sunitinib (50 mg/day, 4 weeks on/2 weeks off; N + S) or pazopanib (800 mg/day; N + P) until progression/unacceptable toxicity. The nivolumab starting dose was 2 mg/kg every 3 weeks, with planned escalation to 5 mg/kg every 3 weeks. Primary endpoints were safety and tolerability; antitumor activity was a secondary endpoint. RESULTS: Arm N + S enrolled 33 patients, 19 of whom were treatment-naïve; this arm advanced to the expansion phase. Median follow-up was 50.0 months. Patients experienced high frequencies of adverse events (AEs) including treatment-related AEs (100%), grade 3/4 treatment-related AEs (82%), and treatment-related AEs leading to discontinuation (39%). Investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) was 55% (18/33) and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.7 months. Median overall survival (OS) was not reached. Arm N + P enrolled 20 patients, all had ≥1 prior systemic therapy; this arm was closed due to dose-limiting toxicities and did not proceed to expansion. Median follow-up was 27.1 months. Patients treated with N + P experienced high frequencies of AEs including treatment-related AEs (100%), grade 3/4 treatment-related AEs (70%), and treatment-related AEs leading to discontinuation (25%). Investigator-assessed ORR was 45% (9/20) and median PFS was 7.2 months. Median OS was 27.9 months. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of standard doses of sunitinib or pazopanib to nivolumab resulted in a high incidence of high-grade toxicities limiting future development of either combination regimen. While there was no adverse impact on response and the OS outcome was notable, the findings suggest that the success of combination regimens based on immune checkpoint inhibitors and antiangiogenic drugs may be dependent on careful selection of the antiangiogenic component and dose. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01472081. Registered 16 November 2011. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40425-018-0420-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6196426/ /pubmed/30348216 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40425-018-0420-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Amin, Asim Plimack, Elizabeth R Ernstoff, Marc S Lewis, Lionel D Bauer, Todd M McDermott, David F Carducci, Michael Kollmannsberger, Christian Rini, Brian I Heng, Daniel Y C Knox, Jennifer Voss, Martin H Spratlin, Jennifer Berghorn, Elmer Yang, Lingfeng Hammers, Hans J Safety and efficacy of nivolumab in combination with sunitinib or pazopanib in advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma: the CheckMate 016 study |
title | Safety and efficacy of nivolumab in combination with sunitinib or pazopanib in advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma: the CheckMate 016 study |
title_full | Safety and efficacy of nivolumab in combination with sunitinib or pazopanib in advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma: the CheckMate 016 study |
title_fullStr | Safety and efficacy of nivolumab in combination with sunitinib or pazopanib in advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma: the CheckMate 016 study |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety and efficacy of nivolumab in combination with sunitinib or pazopanib in advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma: the CheckMate 016 study |
title_short | Safety and efficacy of nivolumab in combination with sunitinib or pazopanib in advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma: the CheckMate 016 study |
title_sort | safety and efficacy of nivolumab in combination with sunitinib or pazopanib in advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma: the checkmate 016 study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6196426/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30348216 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40425-018-0420-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aminasim safetyandefficacyofnivolumabincombinationwithsunitiniborpazopanibinadvancedormetastaticrenalcellcarcinomathecheckmate016study AT plimackelizabethr safetyandefficacyofnivolumabincombinationwithsunitiniborpazopanibinadvancedormetastaticrenalcellcarcinomathecheckmate016study AT ernstoffmarcs safetyandefficacyofnivolumabincombinationwithsunitiniborpazopanibinadvancedormetastaticrenalcellcarcinomathecheckmate016study AT lewislioneld safetyandefficacyofnivolumabincombinationwithsunitiniborpazopanibinadvancedormetastaticrenalcellcarcinomathecheckmate016study AT bauertoddm safetyandefficacyofnivolumabincombinationwithsunitiniborpazopanibinadvancedormetastaticrenalcellcarcinomathecheckmate016study AT mcdermottdavidf safetyandefficacyofnivolumabincombinationwithsunitiniborpazopanibinadvancedormetastaticrenalcellcarcinomathecheckmate016study AT carduccimichael safetyandefficacyofnivolumabincombinationwithsunitiniborpazopanibinadvancedormetastaticrenalcellcarcinomathecheckmate016study AT kollmannsbergerchristian safetyandefficacyofnivolumabincombinationwithsunitiniborpazopanibinadvancedormetastaticrenalcellcarcinomathecheckmate016study AT rinibriani safetyandefficacyofnivolumabincombinationwithsunitiniborpazopanibinadvancedormetastaticrenalcellcarcinomathecheckmate016study AT hengdanielyc safetyandefficacyofnivolumabincombinationwithsunitiniborpazopanibinadvancedormetastaticrenalcellcarcinomathecheckmate016study AT knoxjennifer safetyandefficacyofnivolumabincombinationwithsunitiniborpazopanibinadvancedormetastaticrenalcellcarcinomathecheckmate016study AT vossmartinh safetyandefficacyofnivolumabincombinationwithsunitiniborpazopanibinadvancedormetastaticrenalcellcarcinomathecheckmate016study AT spratlinjennifer safetyandefficacyofnivolumabincombinationwithsunitiniborpazopanibinadvancedormetastaticrenalcellcarcinomathecheckmate016study AT berghornelmer safetyandefficacyofnivolumabincombinationwithsunitiniborpazopanibinadvancedormetastaticrenalcellcarcinomathecheckmate016study AT yanglingfeng safetyandefficacyofnivolumabincombinationwithsunitiniborpazopanibinadvancedormetastaticrenalcellcarcinomathecheckmate016study AT hammershansj safetyandefficacyofnivolumabincombinationwithsunitiniborpazopanibinadvancedormetastaticrenalcellcarcinomathecheckmate016study |